TouchViz: A case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets
TouchViz: A case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets
As more applications move from the desktop to touch devices like tablets, designers must wrestle with the costs of porting a design with as little revision of the UI as possible from one device to the other, or of optimizing the interaction per device. We consider the tradeoffs between two versions of a UI for working with data on a touch tablet. One interface is based on using the conventional desktop metaphor (WIMP) with a control panel, push buttons, and checkboxes - where the mouse click is effectively replaced by a finger tap. The other interface (which we call FLUID) eliminates the control panel and focuses touch actions on the data visualization itself. We describe our design process and evaluation of each interface. We discuss the significantly better task performance and preference for the FLUID interface, in particular how touch design may challenge certain assumptions about the performance benefits of WIMP interfaces that do not hold on touch devices, such as the superiority of gestural vs. control panel based interaction.
Data visualization, Gesture interfaces, Touch displays, User studies
2301-2310
Drucker, Steven M.
b4caba0c-4644-4149-a74a-8c6fee88291d
Fisher, Danyel
0ca3e135-384b-4e31-8f28-e7ab09463a9a
Sadana, Ramik
a1742a5c-98dd-4e14-b7d1-6af640bcf9f9
Herron, Jessica
126ac128-01f1-47ab-8ca8-4c3cfea1fd2d
Schraefel, M. C.
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f
27 April 2013
Drucker, Steven M.
b4caba0c-4644-4149-a74a-8c6fee88291d
Fisher, Danyel
0ca3e135-384b-4e31-8f28-e7ab09463a9a
Sadana, Ramik
a1742a5c-98dd-4e14-b7d1-6af640bcf9f9
Herron, Jessica
126ac128-01f1-47ab-8ca8-4c3cfea1fd2d
Schraefel, M. C.
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f
Drucker, Steven M., Fisher, Danyel, Sadana, Ramik, Herron, Jessica and Schraefel, M. C.
(2013)
TouchViz: A case study comparing two interfaces for data analytics on tablets.
In CHI 2013: Changing Perspectives, Conference Proceedings - The 31st Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
.
(doi:10.1145/2470654.2481318).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
As more applications move from the desktop to touch devices like tablets, designers must wrestle with the costs of porting a design with as little revision of the UI as possible from one device to the other, or of optimizing the interaction per device. We consider the tradeoffs between two versions of a UI for working with data on a touch tablet. One interface is based on using the conventional desktop metaphor (WIMP) with a control panel, push buttons, and checkboxes - where the mouse click is effectively replaced by a finger tap. The other interface (which we call FLUID) eliminates the control panel and focuses touch actions on the data visualization itself. We describe our design process and evaluation of each interface. We discuss the significantly better task performance and preference for the FLUID interface, in particular how touch design may challenge certain assumptions about the performance benefits of WIMP interfaces that do not hold on touch devices, such as the superiority of gestural vs. control panel based interaction.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 27 April 2013
Venue - Dates:
31st Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Perspectives, CHI 2013, , Paris, France, 2013-04-27 - 2013-05-02
Keywords:
Data visualization, Gesture interfaces, Touch displays, User studies
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500758
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500758
PURE UUID: 968d3667-e7aa-41d0-872f-6524674ee1a7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 May 2025 16:57
Last modified: 13 May 2025 01:38
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Steven M. Drucker
Author:
Danyel Fisher
Author:
Ramik Sadana
Author:
Jessica Herron
Author:
M. C. Schraefel
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics