Direct microfluidic antibiotic resistance testing in urine with smartphone capture: significant variation in sample matrix interference between individual human urine samples
Direct microfluidic antibiotic resistance testing in urine with smartphone capture: significant variation in sample matrix interference between individual human urine samples
Rapid and portable direct tests for antibiotic resistance in human clinical samples such as urine could reduce misuse of precious antimicrobials, by allowing treatment decisions to be informed by microfluidic diagnostic tests. We demonstrate that the variable composition of human urine can significantly affect the antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measured using microfluidic devices. The urine sample matrix interference was not observed in pooled normal urine, emphasising the critical importance of assessing matrix interference with a wide range of individual urine samples, rather than a few standardised or pooled controls. Both dilution into assay medium and inclusion of buffer could reduce the matrix interference, but dilution may affect analytical sensitivity by increasing the minimum bacterial cell density needed in a sample for growth to be detected, especially for miniaturised devices that test small sample volumes. We conclude it is vital to fully assess and optimise novel analytical microbiology tools using multiple individual urine samples, otherwise the high variation in matrix interference will compromise the clinical performance of these rapid diagnostics that are urgently needed to tackle the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.
38258-38263
Needs, Sarah Helen
24425556-99e3-4c46-995b-2381776a0a38
Dönmez, Sultan İlayda
640c098c-267c-4af0-8925-70ba1cab5321
Edwards, Alexander Daniel
bc3d9b93-a533-4144-937b-c673d0a28879
29 November 2021
Needs, Sarah Helen
24425556-99e3-4c46-995b-2381776a0a38
Dönmez, Sultan İlayda
640c098c-267c-4af0-8925-70ba1cab5321
Edwards, Alexander Daniel
bc3d9b93-a533-4144-937b-c673d0a28879
Needs, Sarah Helen, Dönmez, Sultan İlayda and Edwards, Alexander Daniel
(2021)
Direct microfluidic antibiotic resistance testing in urine with smartphone capture: significant variation in sample matrix interference between individual human urine samples.
RSC Advances, 11 (60), .
(doi:10.1039/d1ra06867a).
Abstract
Rapid and portable direct tests for antibiotic resistance in human clinical samples such as urine could reduce misuse of precious antimicrobials, by allowing treatment decisions to be informed by microfluidic diagnostic tests. We demonstrate that the variable composition of human urine can significantly affect the antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measured using microfluidic devices. The urine sample matrix interference was not observed in pooled normal urine, emphasising the critical importance of assessing matrix interference with a wide range of individual urine samples, rather than a few standardised or pooled controls. Both dilution into assay medium and inclusion of buffer could reduce the matrix interference, but dilution may affect analytical sensitivity by increasing the minimum bacterial cell density needed in a sample for growth to be detected, especially for miniaturised devices that test small sample volumes. We conclude it is vital to fully assess and optimise novel analytical microbiology tools using multiple individual urine samples, otherwise the high variation in matrix interference will compromise the clinical performance of these rapid diagnostics that are urgently needed to tackle the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.
Text
d1ra06867a
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 November 2021
Published date: 29 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 500846
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500846
ISSN: 2046-2069
PURE UUID: fc0ca83e-7c56-41f1-a673-ee49ebfbaa51
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 May 2025 16:31
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:39
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Sarah Helen Needs
Author:
Sultan İlayda Dönmez
Author:
Alexander Daniel Edwards
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics