The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Multi-centre evaluation of Gram stain in the diagnosis of septic arthritis

Multi-centre evaluation of Gram stain in the diagnosis of septic arthritis
Multi-centre evaluation of Gram stain in the diagnosis of septic arthritis

Introduction: Gram stain of synovial fluid is a rapid test for the diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis. Single-centre studies have suggested Gram stain will miss a considerable proportion of patients who are subsequently synovial-fluid-culture-positive or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive. The object of this study was to reassess Gram stain in a large, multi-centre cohort of patients from the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. 

Methods: the study was a retrospective analysis combining two large datasets. We defined septic arthritis microbiologically as at least one positive joint aspirate culture and/or PCR test. "Best case"and "worst case"definitions were applied depending on the likelihood organisms were true infecting pathogens. 

Results: Gram stain missed a high proportion of culture-/PCR-positive patients using both the best (74 % missed) and worst (81 % missed) case definitions. Using the best case definition, the sensitivity of Gram stain was 0.26, specificity 0.99, positive predictive value 0.84, negative predictive value 0.87, accuracy 0.87, and area under the receiver operator curve 0.62 (95 % CI 0.57 to 0.68, p<0.001). False positive Gram stains were infrequent (1 %). Age, joint involved, and other synovial fluid characteristics were less predictive of a positive culture/PCR than Gram stain. 

Conclusions: while a positive synovial fluid Gram stain should always be considered to indicate potential septic arthritis, a negative Gram stain, regardless of synovial fluid crystals or white cell count, should not be used to rule out septic arthritis. The value of Gram stain as an urgent out-of-hours test for septic arthritis is open to considerable debate.

2206-3552
61-71
Smith, Charlotte
5b1edea6-4171-4f1d-809d-9108c0d4b73e
Maloney, Robert J.
0991530c-1c9f-44ff-9a91-f2458a096305
Wearmouth, Deborah
47702f3d-419c-4270-acfa-4604a54e87e0
Sharma, Hemant
43654cd2-c598-4ffb-83c2-a72c2b17c95e
Saeed, Kordo
87cb67e5-71e8-4759-bf23-2ea00ebd8b39
Ahmad-Saeed, Nusreen
e71dce99-ff6a-4b66-8630-0b21f2c7ff21
Annett, Rachel
2713f665-b2fd-4e67-9420-a1a2abaf273d
Barrett, Lucinda
652689e7-6802-4923-a75f-f6fac571626f
Boyd, Sara E.
de338bfd-55a0-4c3b-99eb-44702750cab7
Davies, Peter
281e2afe-8fc1-4242-875c-df6c4db17375
Hughes, Harriet
e168b3d1-b6a1-4659-a774-f190b170dca4
Jones, Gwennan
1454eab1-20a9-40aa-a982-30ff0c9088bd
Leach, Laura
83171f78-d637-40e1-b6d9-ba022cfca50c
Lynch, Maureen
92138cd9-a6bd-45dc-a475-3c20c6ad1b9b
Nayar, Deepa
c63f51c7-a852-4145-894d-d646cac3c3f6
Marsh, Martin
be174282-b466-4ed2-992c-1a140e1d6474
Mitchell, Shanine
b11cd319-9fce-4800-af4a-e8e6f9bace92
Moffat, Lynn
46623b24-698c-4bbd-8f8f-7587694e89a8
Moore, Luke S.P.
6645b537-50ac-4189-b270-55301bce3d64
Murphy, Michael E.
f19846bf-82f8-45ff-8364-aef4604c7f13
O'Shea, Shaan Ashk
9a3b1fb6-b9c7-4c8b-96d7-ba638ebd5ce0
Peach, Teresa
cd923619-b2ff-434d-aeb9-c3765c9ff4d0
Petridou, Christina
dc8dfd9a-60f5-42dc-86b2-e98b1c7a277a
Reidy, Niamh
62bbbe34-ebce-44ca-9aa1-a18877020c40
Talbot, Ben
bac3462d-4308-4bd2-9915-e6acd8c5a8ea
Aldridge, Catherine
45f9024a-4f93-41bf-8136-94632e894290
Barlow, Gavin
f1f1d57d-6265-4ee2-b9c3-a72ccb6f4e61
et al.
Smith, Charlotte
5b1edea6-4171-4f1d-809d-9108c0d4b73e
Maloney, Robert J.
0991530c-1c9f-44ff-9a91-f2458a096305
Wearmouth, Deborah
47702f3d-419c-4270-acfa-4604a54e87e0
Sharma, Hemant
43654cd2-c598-4ffb-83c2-a72c2b17c95e
Saeed, Kordo
87cb67e5-71e8-4759-bf23-2ea00ebd8b39
Ahmad-Saeed, Nusreen
e71dce99-ff6a-4b66-8630-0b21f2c7ff21
Annett, Rachel
2713f665-b2fd-4e67-9420-a1a2abaf273d
Barrett, Lucinda
652689e7-6802-4923-a75f-f6fac571626f
Boyd, Sara E.
de338bfd-55a0-4c3b-99eb-44702750cab7
Davies, Peter
281e2afe-8fc1-4242-875c-df6c4db17375
Hughes, Harriet
e168b3d1-b6a1-4659-a774-f190b170dca4
Jones, Gwennan
1454eab1-20a9-40aa-a982-30ff0c9088bd
Leach, Laura
83171f78-d637-40e1-b6d9-ba022cfca50c
Lynch, Maureen
92138cd9-a6bd-45dc-a475-3c20c6ad1b9b
Nayar, Deepa
c63f51c7-a852-4145-894d-d646cac3c3f6
Marsh, Martin
be174282-b466-4ed2-992c-1a140e1d6474
Mitchell, Shanine
b11cd319-9fce-4800-af4a-e8e6f9bace92
Moffat, Lynn
46623b24-698c-4bbd-8f8f-7587694e89a8
Moore, Luke S.P.
6645b537-50ac-4189-b270-55301bce3d64
Murphy, Michael E.
f19846bf-82f8-45ff-8364-aef4604c7f13
O'Shea, Shaan Ashk
9a3b1fb6-b9c7-4c8b-96d7-ba638ebd5ce0
Peach, Teresa
cd923619-b2ff-434d-aeb9-c3765c9ff4d0
Petridou, Christina
dc8dfd9a-60f5-42dc-86b2-e98b1c7a277a
Reidy, Niamh
62bbbe34-ebce-44ca-9aa1-a18877020c40
Talbot, Ben
bac3462d-4308-4bd2-9915-e6acd8c5a8ea
Aldridge, Catherine
45f9024a-4f93-41bf-8136-94632e894290
Barlow, Gavin
f1f1d57d-6265-4ee2-b9c3-a72ccb6f4e61

Smith, Charlotte, Maloney, Robert J. and Wearmouth, Deborah , et al. (2025) Multi-centre evaluation of Gram stain in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Journal of Bone and Joint Infection, 10 (2), 61-71. (doi:10.5194/jbji-10-61-2025).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: Gram stain of synovial fluid is a rapid test for the diagnosis of native joint septic arthritis. Single-centre studies have suggested Gram stain will miss a considerable proportion of patients who are subsequently synovial-fluid-culture-positive or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive. The object of this study was to reassess Gram stain in a large, multi-centre cohort of patients from the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. 

Methods: the study was a retrospective analysis combining two large datasets. We defined septic arthritis microbiologically as at least one positive joint aspirate culture and/or PCR test. "Best case"and "worst case"definitions were applied depending on the likelihood organisms were true infecting pathogens. 

Results: Gram stain missed a high proportion of culture-/PCR-positive patients using both the best (74 % missed) and worst (81 % missed) case definitions. Using the best case definition, the sensitivity of Gram stain was 0.26, specificity 0.99, positive predictive value 0.84, negative predictive value 0.87, accuracy 0.87, and area under the receiver operator curve 0.62 (95 % CI 0.57 to 0.68, p<0.001). False positive Gram stains were infrequent (1 %). Age, joint involved, and other synovial fluid characteristics were less predictive of a positive culture/PCR than Gram stain. 

Conclusions: while a positive synovial fluid Gram stain should always be considered to indicate potential septic arthritis, a negative Gram stain, regardless of synovial fluid crystals or white cell count, should not be used to rule out septic arthritis. The value of Gram stain as an urgent out-of-hours test for septic arthritis is open to considerable debate.

Text
jbji-10-61-2025 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (728kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 January 2025
Published date: 17 March 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 500942
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/500942
ISSN: 2206-3552
PURE UUID: 8dc858a0-60b7-4378-892b-1e0d2156c94c
ORCID for Kordo Saeed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-0302

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 May 2025 16:57
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charlotte Smith
Author: Robert J. Maloney
Author: Deborah Wearmouth
Author: Hemant Sharma
Author: Kordo Saeed ORCID iD
Author: Nusreen Ahmad-Saeed
Author: Rachel Annett
Author: Lucinda Barrett
Author: Sara E. Boyd
Author: Peter Davies
Author: Harriet Hughes
Author: Gwennan Jones
Author: Laura Leach
Author: Maureen Lynch
Author: Deepa Nayar
Author: Martin Marsh
Author: Shanine Mitchell
Author: Lynn Moffat
Author: Luke S.P. Moore
Author: Michael E. Murphy
Author: Shaan Ashk O'Shea
Author: Teresa Peach
Author: Christina Petridou
Author: Niamh Reidy
Author: Ben Talbot
Author: Catherine Aldridge
Author: Gavin Barlow
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×