How do physiotherapists use Cauda Equina Syndrome safety netting techniques and what influences their practice?
How do physiotherapists use Cauda Equina Syndrome safety netting techniques and what influences their practice?
Background: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare but serious neurological condition requiring urgent intervention to prevent permanent harm. Although safety netting practices are recommended to mitigate risks, they are inconsistently applied, with limited guidance or evidence to inform their use. Existing research has largely overlooked the specific challenges of CES safety netting, particularly in advanced physiotherapy roles like First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) and Extended Scope Practitioners (ESPs), who play a pivotal role in managing suspected cases. Objective: This study aimed to address the research gap by exploring the experiences, beliefs, and practices of MSK physiotherapists regarding CES safety netting, focusing on its impacts on patients and healthcare systems. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with eight MSK physiotherapists across various roles. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret key themes. Results: Five themes emerged: (1) perceived anxiety and responsibility, emphasising fear of missed diagnoses; (2) challenges with communication and referral pathways, particularly with Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) and Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments; (3) variation in safety netting practices, influenced by individual and contextual factors; (4) the impact of ambiguous CES presentations on decision-making; and (5) systemic barriers, including poorly integrated referral pathways and limited diagnostic resources. Conclusions: This study uniquely highlights the challenges of CES safety netting in advanced physiotherapy roles. Clearer guidance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and improved training are needed to support clinicians and enhance patient outcomes. Further research should investigate systemic impacts and patient perspectives.
Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES), First Contact Practitioners (FCPs), Musculoskeletal physiotherapists, Safety netting
Rice, John
3e7e3926-7690-4576-ada5-a4397e13820e
Sheeran, Liba
ad753e79-56c8-483f-aae5-dd992496bee2
1 August 2025
Rice, John
3e7e3926-7690-4576-ada5-a4397e13820e
Sheeran, Liba
ad753e79-56c8-483f-aae5-dd992496bee2
Rice, John and Sheeran, Liba
(2025)
How do physiotherapists use Cauda Equina Syndrome safety netting techniques and what influences their practice?
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 78, [103353].
(doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2025.103353).
Abstract
Background: Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a rare but serious neurological condition requiring urgent intervention to prevent permanent harm. Although safety netting practices are recommended to mitigate risks, they are inconsistently applied, with limited guidance or evidence to inform their use. Existing research has largely overlooked the specific challenges of CES safety netting, particularly in advanced physiotherapy roles like First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) and Extended Scope Practitioners (ESPs), who play a pivotal role in managing suspected cases. Objective: This study aimed to address the research gap by exploring the experiences, beliefs, and practices of MSK physiotherapists regarding CES safety netting, focusing on its impacts on patients and healthcare systems. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with eight MSK physiotherapists across various roles. Reflexive thematic analysis was employed to identify and interpret key themes. Results: Five themes emerged: (1) perceived anxiety and responsibility, emphasising fear of missed diagnoses; (2) challenges with communication and referral pathways, particularly with Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) and Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments; (3) variation in safety netting practices, influenced by individual and contextual factors; (4) the impact of ambiguous CES presentations on decision-making; and (5) systemic barriers, including poorly integrated referral pathways and limited diagnostic resources. Conclusions: This study uniquely highlights the challenges of CES safety netting in advanced physiotherapy roles. Clearer guidance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and improved training are needed to support clinicians and enhance patient outcomes. Further research should investigate systemic impacts and patient perspectives.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 8 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 May 2025
Published date: 1 August 2025
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
Keywords:
Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES), First Contact Practitioners (FCPs), Musculoskeletal physiotherapists, Safety netting
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 501055
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501055
ISSN: 2468-7812
PURE UUID: ce336acb-0004-4fe3-9922-7af2fff16716
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 May 2025 16:45
Last modified: 16 Aug 2025 02:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
John Rice
Author:
Liba Sheeran
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics