The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The assembly of supermassive black holes at in early-type galaxies from scaling relations

The assembly of supermassive black holes at in early-type galaxies from scaling relations
The assembly of supermassive black holes at in early-type galaxies from scaling relations
The assembly of supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass (M•) and stellar mass (M∗) in galaxies can be studied via the redshift evolution of the M• − M∗ relation, but the ways in which selection bias and physical assembly channels affect this evolution are uncertain. To address this, we compare the M• − M∗ relation for local massive (M∗ > 1010.5M⊙) quiescent early-type galaxies (ETGs) to that for massive ETGs hosting active galactic nuclei (AGN) at z ∼ 0.8. The restrictions on stellar mass and galaxy type limit the assembly channels that may connect the two relations. For the local sample we find log(M•) = 8.80 + 1.10(log M∗ − 11), in line with prior work. For the z ∼ 0.8 sample we finda bias-corrected relation: log(M•) = 7.80 + 1.25(log M∗ − 11). We show, however, that this relation depends on the stellar and SMBH mass functions used to compute the selection bias, the virial relation,the virial factor, and the active fraction, which together introduce uncertainty of up to ∼ 0.6 dex in thez ∼ 0.8 relation. Adopting reasonable choices of these parameters then our z ∼ 0.8 relation lies above that for z ∼ 0 AGN by ∼ 0.5 dex, but below our z ∼ 0 ETG relation by 0.4−1 dex in SMBH mass. We discuss possible sources of this offset, including further bias corrections, ‘downsizing” in SMBH mass assembly, and preferential SMBH growth. Our results highlight the need to reduce uncertainties from selection and measurement bias in SMBH and stellar masses at all redshifts.
astro-ph.GA
arXiv
Farrah, Duncan
7c029d60-a42f-4e47-b85f-17000ca8b767
Engholm, Athena
39c7c6fa-8390-49f7-ad4d-55d9510b4067
Hatziminaoglou, Evanthia
b900737e-d2b3-4e14-998c-5f699dfe7a22
Petty, Sara
3fa1085d-3027-48a5-b304-4340a9f2661f
Shankar, Francesco
b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
Efstathiou, Andreas
74fd3317-739a-410e-adfe-9d6a86489c0e
Ejercito, Kiana
d4138838-b81e-48d1-a171-98a466e580af
Jones, Kirsten
3ac0ba38-7472-43ab-89ef-e4877b9ef404
Lacy, Mark
73f585a8-07d6-4481-b7c1-19c868fc1c12
Lonsdale, Carol
aebc2a18-a660-4ee6-8667-57d558a4be4d
Pearson, Chris
0abfa760-a66a-4b97-9539-db24ea3aec3f
Tarle, Gregory
b99b5456-2e33-4a01-a86f-4f2418ffbede
Windhorst, Rogier
879119ef-df50-4759-b7bb-c2b907839a29
Afonso, Jose
5e6e9462-ec6a-4d2d-9d6b-92741c599473
Clements, David L.
08fae6d6-38e7-4e20-8e09-bf837a5f7069
Croker, Kevin
fb148e2d-800d-4f3e-b949-2c617860edd2
Pitchford, Lura K.
dac5b0aa-a326-43dc-948f-e736f56f7f94
Farrah, Duncan
7c029d60-a42f-4e47-b85f-17000ca8b767
Engholm, Athena
39c7c6fa-8390-49f7-ad4d-55d9510b4067
Hatziminaoglou, Evanthia
b900737e-d2b3-4e14-998c-5f699dfe7a22
Petty, Sara
3fa1085d-3027-48a5-b304-4340a9f2661f
Shankar, Francesco
b10c91e4-85cd-4394-a18a-d4f049fd9cdb
Efstathiou, Andreas
74fd3317-739a-410e-adfe-9d6a86489c0e
Ejercito, Kiana
d4138838-b81e-48d1-a171-98a466e580af
Jones, Kirsten
3ac0ba38-7472-43ab-89ef-e4877b9ef404
Lacy, Mark
73f585a8-07d6-4481-b7c1-19c868fc1c12
Lonsdale, Carol
aebc2a18-a660-4ee6-8667-57d558a4be4d
Pearson, Chris
0abfa760-a66a-4b97-9539-db24ea3aec3f
Tarle, Gregory
b99b5456-2e33-4a01-a86f-4f2418ffbede
Windhorst, Rogier
879119ef-df50-4759-b7bb-c2b907839a29
Afonso, Jose
5e6e9462-ec6a-4d2d-9d6b-92741c599473
Clements, David L.
08fae6d6-38e7-4e20-8e09-bf837a5f7069
Croker, Kevin
fb148e2d-800d-4f3e-b949-2c617860edd2
Pitchford, Lura K.
dac5b0aa-a326-43dc-948f-e736f56f7f94

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

The assembly of supermassive black hole (SMBH) mass (M•) and stellar mass (M∗) in galaxies can be studied via the redshift evolution of the M• − M∗ relation, but the ways in which selection bias and physical assembly channels affect this evolution are uncertain. To address this, we compare the M• − M∗ relation for local massive (M∗ > 1010.5M⊙) quiescent early-type galaxies (ETGs) to that for massive ETGs hosting active galactic nuclei (AGN) at z ∼ 0.8. The restrictions on stellar mass and galaxy type limit the assembly channels that may connect the two relations. For the local sample we find log(M•) = 8.80 + 1.10(log M∗ − 11), in line with prior work. For the z ∼ 0.8 sample we finda bias-corrected relation: log(M•) = 7.80 + 1.25(log M∗ − 11). We show, however, that this relation depends on the stellar and SMBH mass functions used to compute the selection bias, the virial relation,the virial factor, and the active fraction, which together introduce uncertainty of up to ∼ 0.6 dex in thez ∼ 0.8 relation. Adopting reasonable choices of these parameters then our z ∼ 0.8 relation lies above that for z ∼ 0 AGN by ∼ 0.5 dex, but below our z ∼ 0 ETG relation by 0.4−1 dex in SMBH mass. We discuss possible sources of this offset, including further bias corrections, ‘downsizing” in SMBH mass assembly, and preferential SMBH growth. Our results highlight the need to reduce uncertainties from selection and measurement bias in SMBH and stellar masses at all redshifts.

Text
2501.17227v1 - Author's Original
Available under License Other.
Download (756kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 January 2025
Additional Information: ApJ, accepted
Keywords: astro-ph.GA

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501127
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501127
PURE UUID: a368592b-504e-4939-9141-05115727ebaa

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 May 2025 16:30
Last modified: 27 May 2025 16:30

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Duncan Farrah
Author: Athena Engholm
Author: Evanthia Hatziminaoglou
Author: Sara Petty
Author: Andreas Efstathiou
Author: Kiana Ejercito
Author: Kirsten Jones
Author: Mark Lacy
Author: Carol Lonsdale
Author: Chris Pearson
Author: Gregory Tarle
Author: Rogier Windhorst
Author: Jose Afonso
Author: David L. Clements
Author: Kevin Croker
Author: Lura K. Pitchford

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×