The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding the variation of modern endoscopic ultrasound use in patients with oesophageal cancer (VALUE): protocol for a multi-methods study

Understanding the variation of modern endoscopic ultrasound use in patients with oesophageal cancer (VALUE): protocol for a multi-methods study
Understanding the variation of modern endoscopic ultrasound use in patients with oesophageal cancer (VALUE): protocol for a multi-methods study
Objectives

Over 9,000 patients are diagnosed with oesophageal cancer annually in the United Kingdom (UK). Decision-making about treatment options is influenced by radiological staging, which may include computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The use of EUS varies considerably around the UK and, since the introduction of PET-CT, the added value of EUS has been questioned. The VALUE study aims to understand this variation and determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. VALUE will also evaluate patient and clinician experiences and opinions of EUS.

Methods
This is a prospective, observational study investigating EUS in oesophageal cancer staging. Patients will be recruited at up to eleven sites in the UK, where they will be consented (if eligible) and registered onto iMedidata RAVE. Clinical and demographic data, TNM staging, pre and post EUS treatment decisions, and complications will be collected. We will attempt to sample patients from ethnic minority backgrounds in the study population, as they are underrepresented in research. Up to 30 patients and 30 clinicians will be interviewed to evaluate the use of EUS and experiences of both patient and clinician. The primary endpoint is the proportion of cases that EUS changes treatment decisions. Secondary endpoints include identification of factors that clinicians and patients consider when deciding if EUS should be used, the time from diagnosis to treatment decision before and after EUS, and the reasons why EUS changed management. The study has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: blinded. The trial is open to recruitment.

Results 
In total, 180 patients with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who are suitable for EUS will participate. Recruitment is currently planned until September 2025 and study results will be reported after June 2026.

Conclusion
The VALUE study will enable a better understanding of how and why EUS is used in oesophageal cancer. This research will identify important factors that clinicians and patients consider when deciding EUS use and determine the frequency that EUS changes treatment decisions in the modern staging pathway.

 Advances in Knowledge
The VALUE study is a prospective, multi-centre observational study investigating the use of EUS in the modern era of oesophageal cancer staging. The study aims to determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. A qualitative component will explore both clinician and patient attitudes towards EUS.
diagnosis, endoscopic ultrasound, imaging, management, metastases, oesophageal neoplasm, qualitative, staging
2513-9878
Foley, Kieran G
d9d17bd6-415a-48b2-ab23-6cc819e34368
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Franklin, James
74c18bfe-9d85-4ad7-8551-48a20c627a33
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Underwood, Tim
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Cozens, Kelly
ad334c90-643c-4e72-a957-7d3d15a938ce
Bradbury, Katherine
237c812e-976c-4751-946f-c664d542abe2
Fay, Margaret
a5dead45-9d58-4121-9b47-71d4e9dabddf
Chuter, David
9e1b6e0e-6535-44c2-872c-8a0b80779f47
Longman, Kerry-Ann
89c8d96c-2957-4ae3-98ad-c677551f792e
Lindfield, Ben
a4e46cee-ed12-43de-99f6-87f2b419032e
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f
Foley, Kieran G
d9d17bd6-415a-48b2-ab23-6cc819e34368
Boxall, Cherish
62deb102-02d5-4613-bd6c-7f2606367b0a
Franklin, James
74c18bfe-9d85-4ad7-8551-48a20c627a33
Cook, Andrew
ab9c7bb3-974a-4db9-b3c2-9942988005d5
Underwood, Tim
8e81bf60-edd2-4b0e-8324-3068c95ea1c6
Griffiths, Gareth
7fd300c0-d279-4ff6-842d-aa1f2b9b864d
Cozens, Kelly
ad334c90-643c-4e72-a957-7d3d15a938ce
Bradbury, Katherine
237c812e-976c-4751-946f-c664d542abe2
Fay, Margaret
a5dead45-9d58-4121-9b47-71d4e9dabddf
Chuter, David
9e1b6e0e-6535-44c2-872c-8a0b80779f47
Longman, Kerry-Ann
89c8d96c-2957-4ae3-98ad-c677551f792e
Lindfield, Ben
a4e46cee-ed12-43de-99f6-87f2b419032e
Hurt, Chris
bf8b37a0-8f08-4b47-b3f3-6fc65f7ab87f

Foley, Kieran G, Boxall, Cherish, Franklin, James, Cook, Andrew, Underwood, Tim, Griffiths, Gareth, Cozens, Kelly, Bradbury, Katherine, Fay, Margaret, Chuter, David, Longman, Kerry-Ann, Lindfield, Ben and Hurt, Chris (2025) Understanding the variation of modern endoscopic ultrasound use in patients with oesophageal cancer (VALUE): protocol for a multi-methods study. BJR | Open, 7 (1), [tzaf012]. (doi:10.1093/bjro/tzaf012).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives

Over 9,000 patients are diagnosed with oesophageal cancer annually in the United Kingdom (UK). Decision-making about treatment options is influenced by radiological staging, which may include computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The use of EUS varies considerably around the UK and, since the introduction of PET-CT, the added value of EUS has been questioned. The VALUE study aims to understand this variation and determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. VALUE will also evaluate patient and clinician experiences and opinions of EUS.

Methods
This is a prospective, observational study investigating EUS in oesophageal cancer staging. Patients will be recruited at up to eleven sites in the UK, where they will be consented (if eligible) and registered onto iMedidata RAVE. Clinical and demographic data, TNM staging, pre and post EUS treatment decisions, and complications will be collected. We will attempt to sample patients from ethnic minority backgrounds in the study population, as they are underrepresented in research. Up to 30 patients and 30 clinicians will be interviewed to evaluate the use of EUS and experiences of both patient and clinician. The primary endpoint is the proportion of cases that EUS changes treatment decisions. Secondary endpoints include identification of factors that clinicians and patients consider when deciding if EUS should be used, the time from diagnosis to treatment decision before and after EUS, and the reasons why EUS changed management. The study has been registered on Clinicaltrials.gov: blinded. The trial is open to recruitment.

Results 
In total, 180 patients with potentially curable oesophageal cancer who are suitable for EUS will participate. Recruitment is currently planned until September 2025 and study results will be reported after June 2026.

Conclusion
The VALUE study will enable a better understanding of how and why EUS is used in oesophageal cancer. This research will identify important factors that clinicians and patients consider when deciding EUS use and determine the frequency that EUS changes treatment decisions in the modern staging pathway.

 Advances in Knowledge
The VALUE study is a prospective, multi-centre observational study investigating the use of EUS in the modern era of oesophageal cancer staging. The study aims to determine how often and why EUS changes treatment decisions. A qualitative component will explore both clinician and patient attitudes towards EUS.

Text
tzaf012 - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 21 May 2025
Published date: 6 June 2025
Keywords: diagnosis, endoscopic ultrasound, imaging, management, metastases, oesophageal neoplasm, qualitative, staging

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501458
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501458
ISSN: 2513-9878
PURE UUID: 966e5402-024a-41b7-919c-4f20b169ab39
ORCID for Cherish Boxall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-233X
ORCID for Andrew Cook: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6680-439X
ORCID for Tim Underwood: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-2188
ORCID for Gareth Griffiths: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-8021
ORCID for Kelly Cozens: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-9592-9100
ORCID for Chris Hurt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Jun 2025 16:43
Last modified: 03 Sep 2025 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kieran G Foley
Author: Cherish Boxall ORCID iD
Author: James Franklin
Author: Andrew Cook ORCID iD
Author: Tim Underwood ORCID iD
Author: Kelly Cozens ORCID iD
Author: Katherine Bradbury
Author: Margaret Fay
Author: David Chuter
Author: Kerry-Ann Longman
Author: Ben Lindfield
Author: Chris Hurt ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×