The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Law and risk regulation: a case study on solid bulk cargo liquefaction

Law and risk regulation: a case study on solid bulk cargo liquefaction
Law and risk regulation: a case study on solid bulk cargo liquefaction
Solid bulk cargo liquefaction is a major concern to the shipping industry. The phenomenon occurs when granular cargoes with excessive moisture contents turn from a solid to liquid-like state during shipment. This can threaten the vessel’s stability, potentially causing it to capsize. To mitigate this danger, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) introduced the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code in 2011, containing procedures which promote the safe shipment of solid bulk cargoes. Despite these efforts, solid bulk cargo liquefaction remains the leading cause of fatalities on bulk carriers. Although responsible for less than 15% of bulk carrier losses between 2014 and 2023, solid bulk cargo liquefaction was the cause of over 61% of deaths on bulk carriers during that same period.

This thesis argues that the prevalence of the risk is partly due to the limitations in the IMSBC Code’s implementation and enforcement. Weak enforcement mechanisms, combined with a disconnect between public regulation and shipping practices, have potentially hindered the Code’s overall success. These limitations highlight the broader challenges faced by international law in addressing complex global risks. To address these challenges, this thesis proposes a collaborative governance scheme which integrates public regulation with private governance. This approach uses the strengths of both public regulation and private governance to compensate for each other’s shortfalls. Specifically, it argues that public regulation can be used to make legitimate safety standards, whereas private governance can be used to implement and enforce those standards.

Therefore, this thesis explores how these strengths can be realised. It examines how international organizations can create safety standards that effectively address risks whilst also promoting compliance. In particular, it investigates whether the decision-making processes employed by the IMO achieve these benefits. On the private governance side, this thesis assesses how contractual agreements can be used to implement and enforce IMO safety standards, identifying key contractual relationships that could serve as governance mechanisms to enforce the IMSBC Code.

The collaborative governance model developed in this thesis can be adapted to address complex regulatory risks beyond solid bulk cargo liquefaction. The broader applications of the approach can be explored in future research.
University of Southampton
Stevens, Madison Emily
902f78e8-3f73-437e-ada0-0e8902b0299f
Stevens, Madison Emily
902f78e8-3f73-437e-ada0-0e8902b0299f
Reid, Emily
a92c07ed-6f38-49fc-a890-0339489df255
Sturt, Fraser
442e14e1-136f-4159-bd8e-b002bf6b95f6

Stevens, Madison Emily (2025) Law and risk regulation: a case study on solid bulk cargo liquefaction. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 259pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Solid bulk cargo liquefaction is a major concern to the shipping industry. The phenomenon occurs when granular cargoes with excessive moisture contents turn from a solid to liquid-like state during shipment. This can threaten the vessel’s stability, potentially causing it to capsize. To mitigate this danger, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) introduced the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code in 2011, containing procedures which promote the safe shipment of solid bulk cargoes. Despite these efforts, solid bulk cargo liquefaction remains the leading cause of fatalities on bulk carriers. Although responsible for less than 15% of bulk carrier losses between 2014 and 2023, solid bulk cargo liquefaction was the cause of over 61% of deaths on bulk carriers during that same period.

This thesis argues that the prevalence of the risk is partly due to the limitations in the IMSBC Code’s implementation and enforcement. Weak enforcement mechanisms, combined with a disconnect between public regulation and shipping practices, have potentially hindered the Code’s overall success. These limitations highlight the broader challenges faced by international law in addressing complex global risks. To address these challenges, this thesis proposes a collaborative governance scheme which integrates public regulation with private governance. This approach uses the strengths of both public regulation and private governance to compensate for each other’s shortfalls. Specifically, it argues that public regulation can be used to make legitimate safety standards, whereas private governance can be used to implement and enforce those standards.

Therefore, this thesis explores how these strengths can be realised. It examines how international organizations can create safety standards that effectively address risks whilst also promoting compliance. In particular, it investigates whether the decision-making processes employed by the IMO achieve these benefits. On the private governance side, this thesis assesses how contractual agreements can be used to implement and enforce IMO safety standards, identifying key contractual relationships that could serve as governance mechanisms to enforce the IMSBC Code.

The collaborative governance model developed in this thesis can be adapted to address complex regulatory risks beyond solid bulk cargo liquefaction. The broader applications of the approach can be explored in future research.

Text
Law and Risk Regulation: A Case Study on Solid Bulk Cargo Liquefaction - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 19 May 2026.
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Miss-Madison-Stevens
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501606
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501606
PURE UUID: 0d7dee1e-d8a9-4573-870b-3e489e7abf42
ORCID for Madison Emily Stevens: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7319-549X
ORCID for Emily Reid: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-6759
ORCID for Fraser Sturt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-990X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Jun 2025 16:48
Last modified: 10 Sep 2025 10:37

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Emily Reid ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Fraser Sturt ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×