The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison between spatial interpolation approaches in a head-tracked active headrest system

A comparison between spatial interpolation approaches in a head-tracked active headrest system
A comparison between spatial interpolation approaches in a head-tracked active headrest system
The integration of head-tracking can improve the achievable performance of active noise control headrest systems by allowing the mismatch between the plant model used by the controller and the physical plant response to be reduced. Although previous studies have shown that the performance improvement achieved through head-tracking is limited by the resolution of the tracking system, this limitation can be addressed by either interpolating between plant models obtained at different head positions and then calculating the required controller, or interpolating between a set of pre-computed controllers optimised for different head positions. The differences in performance between the two approaches to interpolation, however, have not been explored, despite various interpolation strategies being previously utilised in head-tracked active control systems discussed in the literature. This paper presents a comparison between the two approaches to spatial interpolation for a head-tracked active headrest system. Assuming a tonal disturbance, it is shown through numerical simulations that the performance benefit brought by spatial interpolation differs between the two approaches to interpolation.
Lai, Chung Kwan
564519dc-b054-427f-9256-a454f796b1a9
Cheer, Jordan
8e452f50-4c7d-4d4e-913a-34015e99b9dc
Lai, Chung Kwan
564519dc-b054-427f-9256-a454f796b1a9
Cheer, Jordan
8e452f50-4c7d-4d4e-913a-34015e99b9dc

Lai, Chung Kwan and Cheer, Jordan (2025) A comparison between spatial interpolation approaches in a head-tracked active headrest system. In Forum Acusticum Euronoise 2025. 8 pp . (In Press)

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The integration of head-tracking can improve the achievable performance of active noise control headrest systems by allowing the mismatch between the plant model used by the controller and the physical plant response to be reduced. Although previous studies have shown that the performance improvement achieved through head-tracking is limited by the resolution of the tracking system, this limitation can be addressed by either interpolating between plant models obtained at different head positions and then calculating the required controller, or interpolating between a set of pre-computed controllers optimised for different head positions. The differences in performance between the two approaches to interpolation, however, have not been explored, despite various interpolation strategies being previously utilised in head-tracked active control systems discussed in the literature. This paper presents a comparison between the two approaches to spatial interpolation for a head-tracked active headrest system. Assuming a tonal disturbance, it is shown through numerical simulations that the performance benefit brought by spatial interpolation differs between the two approaches to interpolation.

Text
Lai2025a_conferencePaper_a-comparison-between-spatial-interpolati - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 June 2025
Venue - Dates: 11th Convention of the European Acoustics Association, , Malaga, Spain, 2025-06-23 - 2025-06-26

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501713
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501713
PURE UUID: 087335c4-1fa6-41c1-9136-e3eea50d48cf
ORCID for Chung Kwan Lai: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-4089
ORCID for Jordan Cheer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-5506

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jun 2025 16:53
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Chung Kwan Lai ORCID iD
Author: Jordan Cheer ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×