The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care

Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care
Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care

Background: patients with oncological emergencies require immediate specialist cancer care to ensure optimum outcomes. This is often a stressful, time-sensitive situation for patients and their families who describe having to navigate complex care pathways to access urgent treatment. Acute oncology was established as a subspecialty in the UK in 2009, with the goal to streamline emergency cancer care. Patient experiences of urgent care in acute oncology contexts have not specifically been explored; hence, it is unknown whether patient experiences of emergency cancer care have improved. This may be due to lack of a patient-reported experience measure for this purpose. 

Methods: a mixed methods scoping review was conducted from 2010 to April 2024, with the aim of identifying core aspects of the care experience important to patients with cancer during an acute oncological episode, based on published research evidence. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods articles were sourced and screened in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidance. Core domains of patient experience were collated and summarised using mixed methods evidence synthesis. 

Results: fifteen articles reporting on 14 unique studies were included. Issues important to patient experiences of emergency cancer care were described by patients, healthcare professional, and carer proxies. Studies captured experiences of various care delivery models including telehealth, in-person presentation to an Emergency Department, and acute oncology services. Six core domains of patient experience arose from the synthesis: managing emotional distress, being treated with compassion and respect, deciding when to seek help, hospital environment, quality of care and communication, and discharge planning. 

Conclusions: this is the first review to identify existing literature on patient experiences of emergency cancer care, highlighting core domains of patient experience impactful for patients and their families. Patients’ decisions about when to seek help and the impact of discussing palliative care needs during an emergency were more specific to emergency cancer care, compared to issues like the hospital environment, which can be important throughout a patient’s cancer care journey. Results will help inform development of a patient-reported experience measure to allow healthcare providers to evaluate and continuously improve specialist urgent and emergency cancer care services.

Acute oncology, Oncological emergencies, Patient experience, Scoping review urgent cancer care
0941-4355
Hurley-wallace, A.L.
7942e783-3a78-4fd2-8794-ac62ccf96d84
Defty, J.
6442778f-83b3-4d10-be87-e541865770b5
Richardson, A.
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Wagland, R.
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Hurley-wallace, A.L.
7942e783-3a78-4fd2-8794-ac62ccf96d84
Defty, J.
6442778f-83b3-4d10-be87-e541865770b5
Richardson, A.
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Wagland, R.
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08

Hurley-wallace, A.L., Defty, J., Richardson, A. and Wagland, R. (2025) Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care. Supportive Care in Cancer, 33 (3), [208]. (doi:10.1007/s00520-025-09245-8).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: patients with oncological emergencies require immediate specialist cancer care to ensure optimum outcomes. This is often a stressful, time-sensitive situation for patients and their families who describe having to navigate complex care pathways to access urgent treatment. Acute oncology was established as a subspecialty in the UK in 2009, with the goal to streamline emergency cancer care. Patient experiences of urgent care in acute oncology contexts have not specifically been explored; hence, it is unknown whether patient experiences of emergency cancer care have improved. This may be due to lack of a patient-reported experience measure for this purpose. 

Methods: a mixed methods scoping review was conducted from 2010 to April 2024, with the aim of identifying core aspects of the care experience important to patients with cancer during an acute oncological episode, based on published research evidence. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods articles were sourced and screened in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidance. Core domains of patient experience were collated and summarised using mixed methods evidence synthesis. 

Results: fifteen articles reporting on 14 unique studies were included. Issues important to patient experiences of emergency cancer care were described by patients, healthcare professional, and carer proxies. Studies captured experiences of various care delivery models including telehealth, in-person presentation to an Emergency Department, and acute oncology services. Six core domains of patient experience arose from the synthesis: managing emotional distress, being treated with compassion and respect, deciding when to seek help, hospital environment, quality of care and communication, and discharge planning. 

Conclusions: this is the first review to identify existing literature on patient experiences of emergency cancer care, highlighting core domains of patient experience impactful for patients and their families. Patients’ decisions about when to seek help and the impact of discussing palliative care needs during an emergency were more specific to emergency cancer care, compared to issues like the hospital environment, which can be important throughout a patient’s cancer care journey. Results will help inform development of a patient-reported experience measure to allow healthcare providers to evaluate and continuously improve specialist urgent and emergency cancer care services.

Text
s00520-025-09245-8 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 4 February 2025
Published date: 21 February 2025
Keywords: Acute oncology, Oncological emergencies, Patient experience, Scoping review urgent cancer care

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501731
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501731
ISSN: 0941-4355
PURE UUID: b27c97b5-b09a-4b57-8e2d-1f9c8937a867
ORCID for A.L. Hurley-wallace: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-1247
ORCID for A. Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755
ORCID for R. Wagland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-7587

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jun 2025 17:28
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025 01:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: A.L. Hurley-wallace ORCID iD
Author: J. Defty
Author: A. Richardson ORCID iD
Author: R. Wagland ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×