The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and diurnal analgosedation: a comparative retrospective study in ventilated patients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and diurnal analgosedation: a comparative retrospective study in ventilated patients
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and diurnal analgosedation: a comparative retrospective study in ventilated patients
Background: diurnal variation of analgosedation may worsen patient outcomes. However, there is no data reporting diurnal variation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Objectives: to compare diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in mechanically ventilated adult patients and those receiving ECMO.

Setting: five ICUs (65 beds) including an ECMO unit, with patient recruitment from July 2021 to July 2023.

Methods: retrospective single-centre cohort study including patients aged ≥ 16 years receiving continuous intravenous (IV) opioid (fentanyl) and/or sedative (midazolam and/or propofol), receiving mechanical ventilation with or without ECMO. We collected data on all intravenous analgosedation doses (excluding boluses) from 07:00 to 18:59 (day) or from 19:00 to 06:59 (nighttime) for 48 h.

Results: we identified 1277 patients; of whom 166 (13.0 %) received ECMO and 1111 (87.0 %) received no ECMO. Most were male 815 (63.8 %), median (interquartile range (IQR)) age 58 (42–70) years. We found no diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO patients. However, we found higher doses of fentanyl (mean difference 1.7 µg/kg, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.0, 2.4 μg/kg, p < 0.001) and propofol (mean difference 2.3 mg/kg, 95 % CI: 1.7, 2.9 mg/kg, p < 0.001) at nighttime compared to daytime in non-ECMO patients. A higher proportion of ECMO patients received neuromuscular blocking drugs compared to non-ECMO group 120 (72.3 %) vs 138 (12.4 %); p < 0.001.

Conclusions: we found higher doses of fentanyl and propofol IV infusion doses at nighttime in non-ECMO patients. However, we found no diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO patients, most likely due to deep sedation and use of neuromuscular blocking medicines.

Implications for clinical practice: patient factors, critical illness factors and type of ICU admission are likely contributory factors to differences in diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO and non-ECMO populations.
0964-3397
Remmington, Christopher
73e46f54-40a5-48f2-8890-b8f68c4a8bac
Camporota, Luigi
bdfceef3-a124-4c7a-bb57-d760b64ab170
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Hanks, Fraser
c63dbeda-7643-40dc-8396-85f28778fcfa
Sanderson, Barnaby
01f78fcb-a6f1-4d35-846e-d65f4c151a2a
Rose, Louise
877b0eea-9303-4b80-aa30-a5ddc7e38636
Remmington, Christopher
73e46f54-40a5-48f2-8890-b8f68c4a8bac
Camporota, Luigi
bdfceef3-a124-4c7a-bb57-d760b64ab170
McKenzie, Cathrine A.
ec344dee-5777-49c5-970e-6326e82c9f8c
Hanks, Fraser
c63dbeda-7643-40dc-8396-85f28778fcfa
Sanderson, Barnaby
01f78fcb-a6f1-4d35-846e-d65f4c151a2a
Rose, Louise
877b0eea-9303-4b80-aa30-a5ddc7e38636

Remmington, Christopher, Camporota, Luigi, McKenzie, Cathrine A., Hanks, Fraser, Sanderson, Barnaby and Rose, Louise (2024) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and diurnal analgosedation: a comparative retrospective study in ventilated patients. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 89, [104056]. (doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104056).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: diurnal variation of analgosedation may worsen patient outcomes. However, there is no data reporting diurnal variation in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Objectives: to compare diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in mechanically ventilated adult patients and those receiving ECMO.

Setting: five ICUs (65 beds) including an ECMO unit, with patient recruitment from July 2021 to July 2023.

Methods: retrospective single-centre cohort study including patients aged ≥ 16 years receiving continuous intravenous (IV) opioid (fentanyl) and/or sedative (midazolam and/or propofol), receiving mechanical ventilation with or without ECMO. We collected data on all intravenous analgosedation doses (excluding boluses) from 07:00 to 18:59 (day) or from 19:00 to 06:59 (nighttime) for 48 h.

Results: we identified 1277 patients; of whom 166 (13.0 %) received ECMO and 1111 (87.0 %) received no ECMO. Most were male 815 (63.8 %), median (interquartile range (IQR)) age 58 (42–70) years. We found no diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO patients. However, we found higher doses of fentanyl (mean difference 1.7 µg/kg, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.0, 2.4 μg/kg, p < 0.001) and propofol (mean difference 2.3 mg/kg, 95 % CI: 1.7, 2.9 mg/kg, p < 0.001) at nighttime compared to daytime in non-ECMO patients. A higher proportion of ECMO patients received neuromuscular blocking drugs compared to non-ECMO group 120 (72.3 %) vs 138 (12.4 %); p < 0.001.

Conclusions: we found higher doses of fentanyl and propofol IV infusion doses at nighttime in non-ECMO patients. However, we found no diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO patients, most likely due to deep sedation and use of neuromuscular blocking medicines.

Implications for clinical practice: patient factors, critical illness factors and type of ICU admission are likely contributory factors to differences in diurnal variation of analgosedation doses in ECMO and non-ECMO populations.

Text
Diurnal_sedation_paper_cleaned_version_R2_ICCN - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 April 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 April 2024
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 April 2024
Published date: 30 April 2024

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501825
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501825
ISSN: 0964-3397
PURE UUID: 8ed66c5b-742a-4168-a521-0734dfc79b5c
ORCID for Cathrine A. McKenzie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-9711

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jun 2025 17:01
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christopher Remmington
Author: Luigi Camporota
Author: Cathrine A. McKenzie ORCID iD
Author: Fraser Hanks
Author: Barnaby Sanderson
Author: Louise Rose

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×