Human perception of audio deepfakes
Human perception of audio deepfakes
The recent emergence of deepfakes has brought manipulated and generated content to the forefront of machine learning research.Automatic detection of deepfakes has seen many new machine learning techniques. Human detection capabilities, however, are far less explored. In this paper, we present results from comparing the abilities of humans and machines for detecting audio deep fakes used to imitate someone’s voice. For this, we use a web-based application framework formulated as a game. Participants were asked to distinguish between real and fake audio samples. In our experiment, 410 unique users competed against a state-of-the-art AI deepfake detection algorithm for 13229 total of rounds of the game. We find that humans and deepfake detection algorithms share similar strengths and weaknesses, both struggling to detect certain types of attacks. This is in contrast to the superhuman performance of AI in many application areas such as object detection or face recognition. Concerning human success factors, we find that IT professionals have no advantage over non-professionals but native speakers have an advantage over non-native speakers. Additionally,we find that older participants tend to be more susceptible than younger ones. These insights may be helpful when designing future cybersecurity training for humans as well as developing better detection algorithms.
85-91
Association for Computing Machinery
Müller, Nicholas M.
80b1868b-e575-4bd5-a6b0-e27aa2b71aa3
Pizzi, Karla
fb24c310-1e1b-4961-b365-910ab4412a3f
Williams, Jennifer
3a1568b4-8a0b-41d2-8635-14fe69fbb360
10 October 2022
Müller, Nicholas M.
80b1868b-e575-4bd5-a6b0-e27aa2b71aa3
Pizzi, Karla
fb24c310-1e1b-4961-b365-910ab4412a3f
Williams, Jennifer
3a1568b4-8a0b-41d2-8635-14fe69fbb360
Müller, Nicholas M., Pizzi, Karla and Williams, Jennifer
(2022)
Human perception of audio deepfakes.
In DDAM '22: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Deepfake Detection for Audio Multimedia.
Association for Computing Machinery.
.
(doi:10.1145/3552466.3556531).
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
The recent emergence of deepfakes has brought manipulated and generated content to the forefront of machine learning research.Automatic detection of deepfakes has seen many new machine learning techniques. Human detection capabilities, however, are far less explored. In this paper, we present results from comparing the abilities of humans and machines for detecting audio deep fakes used to imitate someone’s voice. For this, we use a web-based application framework formulated as a game. Participants were asked to distinguish between real and fake audio samples. In our experiment, 410 unique users competed against a state-of-the-art AI deepfake detection algorithm for 13229 total of rounds of the game. We find that humans and deepfake detection algorithms share similar strengths and weaknesses, both struggling to detect certain types of attacks. This is in contrast to the superhuman performance of AI in many application areas such as object detection or face recognition. Concerning human success factors, we find that IT professionals have no advantage over non-professionals but native speakers have an advantage over non-native speakers. Additionally,we find that older participants tend to be more susceptible than younger ones. These insights may be helpful when designing future cybersecurity training for humans as well as developing better detection algorithms.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 10 October 2022
Venue - Dates:
International Workshop on Deepfake Detection for Audio Multimedia (DDAM '22), , Lisboa, Portugal, 2022-10-10
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 501851
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501851
PURE UUID: 686ef778-8b5f-467e-93d5-59fc44bf4f1e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Jun 2025 16:46
Last modified: 12 Jun 2025 02:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nicholas M. Müller
Author:
Karla Pizzi
Author:
Jennifer Williams
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics