Ten recommendations for scanning foraminifera by X-ray computed tomography
Ten recommendations for scanning foraminifera by X-ray computed tomography
Marine sediment cores uniquely provide a temporally high-resolution and well-preserved archive of foraminifera fossils, which are essential for understanding environmental, ecological, and evolutionary dynamics over geological timescales. Foraminifera preserve their entire ontogeny in their fossilized shells, and much of this life history remains hidden from view under a light microscope. X-ray microfocus computed tomography (μCT) imaging of individual foraminifera reveals internal chambers and pores that are traditionally hidden from view. Their volume, shape, and growth form foundations of oceanographic and environmental research.
Here, we present a set of 10 recommendations for the preparation and scanning of individual fossilized foraminifera using glue-, gel-, and solvent-free methods. We focus on the primary X-ray parameters of μCT imaging that a researcher can optimize according to their throughput, signal-to-noise ratio, and cost requirements to generate three-dimensional (3D; volumetric) datasets. We showcase the effect of these parameters on image quality through repeated scans on a single planktonic foraminifer that varied the X-ray beam power and energy, detector binning, number of projections, and exposure times.
In our case study, the highest beam power resulted in the widest contrast between the subject of interest and the background, allowing the easiest threshold-based segmentation of the object and aiding computers in automated feature extraction.
The values of these parameters can exhibit significant variability across individuals, based on the specific needs of the study, the equipment used, and the unique attributes of the samples under consideration. Our motivation with this paper is to share our experience and offer a foundation for similar studies.
computed tomography, foraminifera, method, microfossil, x-ray
107-117
Searle-Barnes, Alex
27cd9e5f-9a76-4d3d-8c88-0d3d0b1fad63
Brombacher, Anieke
2a4bbb84-4743-4a36-973b-4ad2bf743154
Katsamenis, Orestis
8553e7c3-d860-4b7a-a883-abf6c0c4b438
Rankin, Kathryn
d9516566-0ad8-473d-b99b-4683c663a2b7
Mavrogordato, Mark
f3e0879b-118a-463a-a130-1c890e9ab547
Ezard, Thomas
a143a893-07d0-4673-a2dd-cea2cd7e1374
29 April 2025
Searle-Barnes, Alex
27cd9e5f-9a76-4d3d-8c88-0d3d0b1fad63
Brombacher, Anieke
2a4bbb84-4743-4a36-973b-4ad2bf743154
Katsamenis, Orestis
8553e7c3-d860-4b7a-a883-abf6c0c4b438
Rankin, Kathryn
d9516566-0ad8-473d-b99b-4683c663a2b7
Mavrogordato, Mark
f3e0879b-118a-463a-a130-1c890e9ab547
Ezard, Thomas
a143a893-07d0-4673-a2dd-cea2cd7e1374
Searle-Barnes, Alex, Brombacher, Anieke, Katsamenis, Orestis, Rankin, Kathryn, Mavrogordato, Mark and Ezard, Thomas
(2025)
Ten recommendations for scanning foraminifera by X-ray computed tomography.
Journal of Micropalaeontology, 44 (1), .
(doi:10.5194/jm-44-107-2025).
Abstract
Marine sediment cores uniquely provide a temporally high-resolution and well-preserved archive of foraminifera fossils, which are essential for understanding environmental, ecological, and evolutionary dynamics over geological timescales. Foraminifera preserve their entire ontogeny in their fossilized shells, and much of this life history remains hidden from view under a light microscope. X-ray microfocus computed tomography (μCT) imaging of individual foraminifera reveals internal chambers and pores that are traditionally hidden from view. Their volume, shape, and growth form foundations of oceanographic and environmental research.
Here, we present a set of 10 recommendations for the preparation and scanning of individual fossilized foraminifera using glue-, gel-, and solvent-free methods. We focus on the primary X-ray parameters of μCT imaging that a researcher can optimize according to their throughput, signal-to-noise ratio, and cost requirements to generate three-dimensional (3D; volumetric) datasets. We showcase the effect of these parameters on image quality through repeated scans on a single planktonic foraminifer that varied the X-ray beam power and energy, detector binning, number of projections, and exposure times.
In our case study, the highest beam power resulted in the widest contrast between the subject of interest and the background, allowing the easiest threshold-based segmentation of the object and aiding computers in automated feature extraction.
The values of these parameters can exhibit significant variability across individuals, based on the specific needs of the study, the equipment used, and the unique attributes of the samples under consideration. Our motivation with this paper is to share our experience and offer a foundation for similar studies.
Text
Searle-Barnes - 2025 - Ten recommendations for scanning foraminifera
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 February 2025
Published date: 29 April 2025
Keywords:
computed tomography, foraminifera, method, microfossil, x-ray
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 501937
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501937
ISSN: 0262-821X
PURE UUID: 8969ce72-3f34-436e-a6d3-f7d31f8b6b31
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Jun 2025 16:45
Last modified: 11 Sep 2025 02:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kathryn Rankin
Author:
Thomas Ezard
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics