The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Essays on card fraud, identity theft, and modern payment methods during and post-COVID-19 pandemic

Essays on card fraud, identity theft, and modern payment methods during and post-COVID-19 pandemic
Essays on card fraud, identity theft, and modern payment methods during and post-COVID-19 pandemic
This thesis sheds light on how financial crimes affect and are affected by modern payment methods in terms of their adoption and usage. Various empirical strategies are proposed to examine and understand the relationship between the evolution of payment methods and financial crimes, with a particular focus on identity theft and fraud, in light of the global crisis. Specifically, this thesis includes three distinct yet interconnected empirical studies, each using data from a different wave of the United States Survey of Consumer Payment Choice. The first study examines consumer adoption and usage decisions regarding electronic, paper, and card payment methods during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the influence of credit and debit card fraud on these decisions. Employing the two-step Heckman model to estimate adoption and usage decisions simultaneously while addressing any potential sample selection bias, we found that card fraud incidents significantly impact the adoption and usage of specific paper and card payment methods while having no effect on electronic payment methods, particularly online banking bill payments (referred to as online and mobile banking) and bank account number payments. This study also examined the impact of identity theft (both direct and indirect exposure), payment method characteristics, socio-demographic characteristics, and the availability of alternative payment methods on consumer electronic payment behaviour, revealing that the impact of some of these factors varied during the pandemic compared to the pre-crisis period while others remained constant over time. The robustness testing of the primary results, through examining the use of electronic payment methods across various transaction types, revealed that the final effect differs based on the nature of the transaction.

The second study examines cryptocurrency knowledge and adoption, specifically investigating whether cryptocurrency is recognised and adopted as a secure payment method in the COVID-19 era. Therefore, this study examines the impact of identity theft and card fraud incidents on the knowledge and adoption of cryptocurrency. Using the Linear Probability Model, we found that individuals’ exposure to identity theft increases their awareness of cryptocurrencies. This indicates that victims of identity theft recognise cryptocurrencies as a secure payment option. Whereas the exposure to credit or debit card fraud affects cryptocurrency knowledge only when combined with the effects of other financial crimes, including identity theft and other card fraud incidents, as evidenced by joint significance tests. In contrast, the impact of financial crimes, whether individually or collectively, does not influence the adoption of cryptocurrency. This study also examined the impact of convenience and security perceptions regarding centralised payment methods, digital financial behaviours, and socio-demographic characteristics on cryptocurrency knowledge and adoption, noting some similarities and differences in their effects during and before the global crisis.

The findings of the first two studies concerning financial crimes prompt an examination of these crimes from a victimisation perspective. Given the lack of attention to card fraud in the victimology literature compared to the intense focus on identity theft, this study examines debit and credit card fraud victimisation by expanding the scope of Routine Activity Theory, particularly post the COVID-19 pandemic era. This study examines whether modern payment technologies, specifically mobile payment applications, create new opportunities for card fraud crimes. Using the Probit model, we found that the use of mobile wallets (e.g., Apple Pay, Google Pay, or Samsung Pay) increases the probability of both debit and credit card fraud victimisation, whereas the use of PayPal and Cash App increases the likelihood of debit card fraud victimisation. This study also explored financial and socio-demographic characteristics associated with card fraud victimisation, indicating that individuals with below average credit scores, older individuals, women, and non-white individuals were more susceptible to debit card fraud while individuals with above average credit scores, individuals with multiple credit cards, older individuals, and those residing in urban or mixed counties were more likely to experience credit card fraud. Together, these studies provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between modern payment methods and financial crimes in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
University of Southampton
Alassaf, Farah Saleh
0d9bdded-9035-43a3-9289-75b11ee2037a
Alassaf, Farah Saleh
0d9bdded-9035-43a3-9289-75b11ee2037a
Luo, Di
d6e61fed-fc5d-4aaf-a742-8e957344ee6d
Maaitah, Ahmad
7057414d-762b-49d8-9724-f6d9e1fffd09

Alassaf, Farah Saleh (2025) Essays on card fraud, identity theft, and modern payment methods during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 241pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis sheds light on how financial crimes affect and are affected by modern payment methods in terms of their adoption and usage. Various empirical strategies are proposed to examine and understand the relationship between the evolution of payment methods and financial crimes, with a particular focus on identity theft and fraud, in light of the global crisis. Specifically, this thesis includes three distinct yet interconnected empirical studies, each using data from a different wave of the United States Survey of Consumer Payment Choice. The first study examines consumer adoption and usage decisions regarding electronic, paper, and card payment methods during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the influence of credit and debit card fraud on these decisions. Employing the two-step Heckman model to estimate adoption and usage decisions simultaneously while addressing any potential sample selection bias, we found that card fraud incidents significantly impact the adoption and usage of specific paper and card payment methods while having no effect on electronic payment methods, particularly online banking bill payments (referred to as online and mobile banking) and bank account number payments. This study also examined the impact of identity theft (both direct and indirect exposure), payment method characteristics, socio-demographic characteristics, and the availability of alternative payment methods on consumer electronic payment behaviour, revealing that the impact of some of these factors varied during the pandemic compared to the pre-crisis period while others remained constant over time. The robustness testing of the primary results, through examining the use of electronic payment methods across various transaction types, revealed that the final effect differs based on the nature of the transaction.

The second study examines cryptocurrency knowledge and adoption, specifically investigating whether cryptocurrency is recognised and adopted as a secure payment method in the COVID-19 era. Therefore, this study examines the impact of identity theft and card fraud incidents on the knowledge and adoption of cryptocurrency. Using the Linear Probability Model, we found that individuals’ exposure to identity theft increases their awareness of cryptocurrencies. This indicates that victims of identity theft recognise cryptocurrencies as a secure payment option. Whereas the exposure to credit or debit card fraud affects cryptocurrency knowledge only when combined with the effects of other financial crimes, including identity theft and other card fraud incidents, as evidenced by joint significance tests. In contrast, the impact of financial crimes, whether individually or collectively, does not influence the adoption of cryptocurrency. This study also examined the impact of convenience and security perceptions regarding centralised payment methods, digital financial behaviours, and socio-demographic characteristics on cryptocurrency knowledge and adoption, noting some similarities and differences in their effects during and before the global crisis.

The findings of the first two studies concerning financial crimes prompt an examination of these crimes from a victimisation perspective. Given the lack of attention to card fraud in the victimology literature compared to the intense focus on identity theft, this study examines debit and credit card fraud victimisation by expanding the scope of Routine Activity Theory, particularly post the COVID-19 pandemic era. This study examines whether modern payment technologies, specifically mobile payment applications, create new opportunities for card fraud crimes. Using the Probit model, we found that the use of mobile wallets (e.g., Apple Pay, Google Pay, or Samsung Pay) increases the probability of both debit and credit card fraud victimisation, whereas the use of PayPal and Cash App increases the likelihood of debit card fraud victimisation. This study also explored financial and socio-demographic characteristics associated with card fraud victimisation, indicating that individuals with below average credit scores, older individuals, women, and non-white individuals were more susceptible to debit card fraud while individuals with above average credit scores, individuals with multiple credit cards, older individuals, and those residing in urban or mixed counties were more likely to experience credit card fraud. Together, these studies provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between modern payment methods and financial crimes in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Text
Thesis 3b - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2028.
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-MISS-Farah-Alassaf
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501958
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501958
PURE UUID: c23970a9-63b6-4a2c-bd93-acc396bef2da
ORCID for Farah Saleh Alassaf: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-3965
ORCID for Ahmad Maaitah: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-5335

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jun 2025 17:00
Last modified: 11 Sep 2025 03:25

Export record

Contributors

Author: Farah Saleh Alassaf ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Di Luo
Thesis advisor: Ahmad Maaitah ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×