The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modeling and feasibility assessment of mineral carbonation based on biological pH swing for atmospheric CO2 removal

Modeling and feasibility assessment of mineral carbonation based on biological pH swing for atmospheric CO2 removal
Modeling and feasibility assessment of mineral carbonation based on biological pH swing for atmospheric CO2 removal
Mitigating climate change requires both the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. This study investigates a novel biological pH swing strategy for mineral carbonation at ambient conditions as a potential option for atmospheric CO2 removal. Through mathematical modeling, we evaluated a mineral carbonation system that utilized Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans to achieve alternating sulfur reduction and oxidation, respectively, with the cyclic process to effect pH swing for promoting the dissolution of a silicate mineral and the subsequent precipitation of a carbonate mineral to store CO2. Sulfur cycles employing two reduced compounds, namely, hydrogen sulfide and thiosulfate, were compared. Our simulation results predicted that it is feasible to use the sulfur cycles to achieve the intended pH swing in a range of 1–10 and hence the acceleration of CO2 removal from the air. Despite the implementation of the pH swing, gas–liquid mass transfer and mineral dissolution remained rate-limiting compared to biological conversion. Dissolving 35 kg of forsterite in a 1 m3 reactor takes between 250 and 300 h, leading to the removal of approximately 22 kg of CO2 through MgCO3 precipitation, which requires about 180 h. Between the two forms of reduced sulfur, thiosulfate would offer considerable operational advantages over hydrogen sulfide. This theoretical exploration also identified key areas to be investigated to further establish the potential of the sulfur-cycle-based carbonation approach to CO2 removal.
atmospheric CO removal, mathematical modeling, microbial process, mineral carbonation, pH swing, sulfur cycle
2168-0485
6972-6981
Zhang, Yukun
735f9e99-f7ea-478b-8064-3643cadd5724
Long, Spencer
b40ca8f9-bc42-4bbb-8d81-c30d96f0d8d5
Duret, Manon T.
7aa9476b-d178-4f09-b089-02c7e9943eba
Bullock, Liam A.
25880643-e62f-4bb7-9930-9f02a1df4440
Lam, Phyllis
996aef80-a15d-4827-aed8-1b97b378f6ad
Yang, Aidong
8f7db0b8-b2ea-4944-b11d-e32ee58d6d1c
Zhang, Yukun
735f9e99-f7ea-478b-8064-3643cadd5724
Long, Spencer
b40ca8f9-bc42-4bbb-8d81-c30d96f0d8d5
Duret, Manon T.
7aa9476b-d178-4f09-b089-02c7e9943eba
Bullock, Liam A.
25880643-e62f-4bb7-9930-9f02a1df4440
Lam, Phyllis
996aef80-a15d-4827-aed8-1b97b378f6ad
Yang, Aidong
8f7db0b8-b2ea-4944-b11d-e32ee58d6d1c

Zhang, Yukun, Long, Spencer, Duret, Manon T., Bullock, Liam A., Lam, Phyllis and Yang, Aidong (2025) Modeling and feasibility assessment of mineral carbonation based on biological pH swing for atmospheric CO2 removal. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 13 (19), 6972-6981. (doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c10708).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Mitigating climate change requires both the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. This study investigates a novel biological pH swing strategy for mineral carbonation at ambient conditions as a potential option for atmospheric CO2 removal. Through mathematical modeling, we evaluated a mineral carbonation system that utilized Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans to achieve alternating sulfur reduction and oxidation, respectively, with the cyclic process to effect pH swing for promoting the dissolution of a silicate mineral and the subsequent precipitation of a carbonate mineral to store CO2. Sulfur cycles employing two reduced compounds, namely, hydrogen sulfide and thiosulfate, were compared. Our simulation results predicted that it is feasible to use the sulfur cycles to achieve the intended pH swing in a range of 1–10 and hence the acceleration of CO2 removal from the air. Despite the implementation of the pH swing, gas–liquid mass transfer and mineral dissolution remained rate-limiting compared to biological conversion. Dissolving 35 kg of forsterite in a 1 m3 reactor takes between 250 and 300 h, leading to the removal of approximately 22 kg of CO2 through MgCO3 precipitation, which requires about 180 h. Between the two forms of reduced sulfur, thiosulfate would offer considerable operational advantages over hydrogen sulfide. This theoretical exploration also identified key areas to be investigated to further establish the potential of the sulfur-cycle-based carbonation approach to CO2 removal.

Text
zhang-et-al-2025-modeling-and-feasibility-assessment-of-mineral-carbonation-based-on-biological-ph-swing-for - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (3MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 8 May 2025
Published date: 19 May 2025
Keywords: atmospheric CO removal, mathematical modeling, microbial process, mineral carbonation, pH swing, sulfur cycle

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 501970
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/501970
ISSN: 2168-0485
PURE UUID: a6b4d9fa-945b-4402-be80-6d9396e380c5
ORCID for Phyllis Lam: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2067-171X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Jun 2025 17:11
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Yukun Zhang
Author: Spencer Long
Author: Manon T. Duret
Author: Liam A. Bullock
Author: Phyllis Lam ORCID iD
Author: Aidong Yang

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×