Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study.
Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study.
Background: critical care beds are a limited resource, yet research indicates that recommendations for postoperative critical care admission based on patient-level risk stratification are not followed. It is unclear how prioritisation decisions are made in real-world settings and the effect of this prioritisation on outcomes.
Methods: this was a prespecified analysis of an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery, conducted in 274 hospitals across the UK and Australasia during 2017. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity at day 7. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between critical care admission and patient and health system factors. The causal effect of critical care admission on outcome was estimated using variation in critical care occupancy as a natural experiment in an instrumental variable analysis.
Results: a total of 19,491 patients from 248 hospitals were eligible for analysis, of whom 2107 were directly admitted to critical care postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 2829/19,491 (15%) patients. Increasing surgical risk was associated with critical care admission, as was increased availability of critical care beds (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.06), p = 0.002) per available bed; however, the probability of admission varied significantly between hospitals (median odds ratio 3.05). There was no evidence of a difference in postoperative morbidity with critical care admission (odds ratio (95%CI) 0.91 (0.57–1.45), p = 0.710).
Discussion: postoperative critical care admission is variable and related to bed availability. Statistical methods that adjust for unobserved confounding lowered the estimates of harm previously reported to have been associated with postoperative critical care admission. Our findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial which would evaluate any potential benefits for postoperative critical care admission for patients in whom there is no absolute indication for admission.
1165-1179
Campbell, Ruaraidh A.S.
c0c4485b-bf0e-4c23-a3f7-93ae81f250ad
Thevathasan, Tharusan
554cf3da-b890-4bc6-b37b-cd97304d8c09
Wong, Danny J.N.
5548b766-ab78-4816-91eb-e80722db361d
Wilson, Andrew M.
536dc43f-17cb-4501-8d07-ec938676a0f6
Lindsay, Helen A.
f69adeb7-d467-4e1b-a972-8c622f585a34
Campbell, Douglas
946d51aa-fbf5-4ad7-b0e6-5b63125cc615
Popham, Scott
7751b311-c0f6-4cae-a5bf-a868274c02cf
Barneto, Lisa M.
e850745c-3760-43b4-983b-86aec927d332
Myles, Paul S.
3c704c43-b054-4e46-9dd0-c383c295b686
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
117f1e9b-1a63-4be2-b41c-e95dda807271
Harris, Steve K.
0e865aac-dcb2-4f88-a45c-f57894360da1
Cumpstey, Andrew
cd040417-5e62-41d2-8640-1ec8905858a7
the SNAP-2: EPICCS collaborators
26 September 2024
Campbell, Ruaraidh A.S.
c0c4485b-bf0e-4c23-a3f7-93ae81f250ad
Thevathasan, Tharusan
554cf3da-b890-4bc6-b37b-cd97304d8c09
Wong, Danny J.N.
5548b766-ab78-4816-91eb-e80722db361d
Wilson, Andrew M.
536dc43f-17cb-4501-8d07-ec938676a0f6
Lindsay, Helen A.
f69adeb7-d467-4e1b-a972-8c622f585a34
Campbell, Douglas
946d51aa-fbf5-4ad7-b0e6-5b63125cc615
Popham, Scott
7751b311-c0f6-4cae-a5bf-a868274c02cf
Barneto, Lisa M.
e850745c-3760-43b4-983b-86aec927d332
Myles, Paul S.
3c704c43-b054-4e46-9dd0-c383c295b686
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
117f1e9b-1a63-4be2-b41c-e95dda807271
Harris, Steve K.
0e865aac-dcb2-4f88-a45c-f57894360da1
Cumpstey, Andrew
cd040417-5e62-41d2-8640-1ec8905858a7
Campbell, Ruaraidh A.S., Thevathasan, Tharusan, Wong, Danny J.N., Wilson, Andrew M., Lindsay, Helen A., Campbell, Douglas, Popham, Scott, Barneto, Lisa M., Myles, Paul S., Moonesinghe, S. Ramani and Harris, Steve K.
,
the SNAP-2: EPICCS collaborators
(2024)
Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes: a multinational cohort study.
Anaesthesia, 79 (11), .
(doi:10.1111/anae.16383).
Abstract
Background: critical care beds are a limited resource, yet research indicates that recommendations for postoperative critical care admission based on patient-level risk stratification are not followed. It is unclear how prioritisation decisions are made in real-world settings and the effect of this prioritisation on outcomes.
Methods: this was a prespecified analysis of an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery, conducted in 274 hospitals across the UK and Australasia during 2017. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity at day 7. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between critical care admission and patient and health system factors. The causal effect of critical care admission on outcome was estimated using variation in critical care occupancy as a natural experiment in an instrumental variable analysis.
Results: a total of 19,491 patients from 248 hospitals were eligible for analysis, of whom 2107 were directly admitted to critical care postoperatively. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 2829/19,491 (15%) patients. Increasing surgical risk was associated with critical care admission, as was increased availability of critical care beds (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.04 (1.01–1.06), p = 0.002) per available bed; however, the probability of admission varied significantly between hospitals (median odds ratio 3.05). There was no evidence of a difference in postoperative morbidity with critical care admission (odds ratio (95%CI) 0.91 (0.57–1.45), p = 0.710).
Discussion: postoperative critical care admission is variable and related to bed availability. Statistical methods that adjust for unobserved confounding lowered the estimates of harm previously reported to have been associated with postoperative critical care admission. Our findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial which would evaluate any potential benefits for postoperative critical care admission for patients in whom there is no absolute indication for admission.
Text
Anaesthesia - 2024 - Campbell - Critical care unit bed availability and postoperative outcomes a multinational cohort
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 June 2024
Published date: 26 September 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502008
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502008
ISSN: 0003-2409
PURE UUID: a3372269-3a5f-4464-a77c-c5985933d24d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jun 2025 16:34
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:37
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ruaraidh A.S. Campbell
Author:
Tharusan Thevathasan
Author:
Danny J.N. Wong
Author:
Andrew M. Wilson
Author:
Helen A. Lindsay
Author:
Douglas Campbell
Author:
Scott Popham
Author:
Lisa M. Barneto
Author:
Paul S. Myles
Author:
S. Ramani Moonesinghe
Author:
Steve K. Harris
Author:
Andrew Cumpstey
Corporate Author: the SNAP-2: EPICCS collaborators
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics