Definite formulae, negation-as-failure, and the base-extension semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic
Definite formulae, negation-as-failure, and the base-extension semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic
Proof-theoretic semantics (P-tS) is the paradigm of semantics in which meaning in logic is based on proof (as opposed to truth). A particular instance of P-tS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL) is its base-extension semantics (B-eS). This semantics is given by a relation called support, explaining the meaning of the logical constants, which is parameterized by systems of rules called bases that provide the semantics of atomic propositions. In this paper, we interpret bases as collections of definite formulae and use the operational view of them as provided by uniform proof-search—the proof-theoretic foundation of logic programming (LP)—to establish the completeness of IPL for the B-eS. This perspective allows negation, a subtle issue in P-tS, to be understood in terms of the negation-as-failure protocol in LP. Specifically, while the denial of a proposition is traditionally understood as the assertion of its negation, in B-eS we may understand the denial of a proposition as the failure to find a proof of it. In this way, assertion and denial are both prime concepts in P-tS.
239-266
Gheorghiu, Alexander V.
4569dbd7-8426-4631-80a1-424e922436da
Pym, David J.
dcd2c0b6-80dd-4486-9649-8f0ee547d110
18 July 2023
Gheorghiu, Alexander V.
4569dbd7-8426-4631-80a1-424e922436da
Pym, David J.
dcd2c0b6-80dd-4486-9649-8f0ee547d110
Gheorghiu, Alexander V. and Pym, David J.
(2023)
Definite formulae, negation-as-failure, and the base-extension semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic.
Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 52 (2), .
(doi:10.18778/0138-0680.2023.16).
Abstract
Proof-theoretic semantics (P-tS) is the paradigm of semantics in which meaning in logic is based on proof (as opposed to truth). A particular instance of P-tS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL) is its base-extension semantics (B-eS). This semantics is given by a relation called support, explaining the meaning of the logical constants, which is parameterized by systems of rules called bases that provide the semantics of atomic propositions. In this paper, we interpret bases as collections of definite formulae and use the operational view of them as provided by uniform proof-search—the proof-theoretic foundation of logic programming (LP)—to establish the completeness of IPL for the B-eS. This perspective allows negation, a subtle issue in P-tS, to be understood in terms of the negation-as-failure protocol in LP. Specifically, while the denial of a proposition is traditionally understood as the assertion of its negation, in B-eS we may understand the denial of a proposition as the failure to find a proof of it. In this way, assertion and denial are both prime concepts in P-tS.
Text
239-266_Gheorghiu,+Pym
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 18 July 2023
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502010
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502010
PURE UUID: 0b6ae883-34db-4805-9255-1d0cb19e4047
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Jun 2025 16:36
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:47
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alexander V. Gheorghiu
Author:
David J. Pym
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics