Bearing the burden of peace: Intergroup attribution bias and public support for peace provisions
Bearing the burden of peace: Intergroup attribution bias and public support for peace provisions
What drives public support for peace provisions? Based on intergroup attribution theory, we argue that public support for peace provisions depends on “who bears the burden of peace,” with people wanting to protect their ingroup while holding the outgroup accountable. To examine this claim, we conducted a series of question-wording experiments with more than 1650 Azerbaijani participants shortly after a deadly resurgence of the Nagorno-Karabakh war. Our initial findings confirm that support for war crime punishments and monetary reparations decreases when the ingroup stands trial or must pay. Conversely, support increases when these same burdens fall on the outgroup. A follow-up study shows that these patterns persist for at least 6 months but also reveals a more nuanced perspective. Public support for peace provisions does not automatically decrease when the ingroup bears the cost or increase when the outgroup bears it; rather, it depends on the group-based implications of the provision under consideration. Taken together, our results underscore the importance of crafting and communicating peace provisions in a tailored manner and the potential of emphasizing burden sharing as an effective strategy for addressing intergroup hostilities and fostering sustainable peace.
conflict, experiment, international conflicts, peace studies
300-320
Godefroidt, Amélie
0a654afc-3079-4b42-bd33-bf2fe3a3cb3a
Muradova, Lala
5f2595b4-c347-4e45-bae5-bb0f5b397fa4
Godefroidt, Amélie
0a654afc-3079-4b42-bd33-bf2fe3a3cb3a
Muradova, Lala
5f2595b4-c347-4e45-bae5-bb0f5b397fa4
Godefroidt, Amélie and Muradova, Lala
(2024)
Bearing the burden of peace: Intergroup attribution bias and public support for peace provisions.
Political Psychology, 46 (2), .
(doi:10.1111/pops.13008).
Abstract
What drives public support for peace provisions? Based on intergroup attribution theory, we argue that public support for peace provisions depends on “who bears the burden of peace,” with people wanting to protect their ingroup while holding the outgroup accountable. To examine this claim, we conducted a series of question-wording experiments with more than 1650 Azerbaijani participants shortly after a deadly resurgence of the Nagorno-Karabakh war. Our initial findings confirm that support for war crime punishments and monetary reparations decreases when the ingroup stands trial or must pay. Conversely, support increases when these same burdens fall on the outgroup. A follow-up study shows that these patterns persist for at least 6 months but also reveals a more nuanced perspective. Public support for peace provisions does not automatically decrease when the ingroup bears the cost or increase when the outgroup bears it; rather, it depends on the group-based implications of the provision under consideration. Taken together, our results underscore the importance of crafting and communicating peace provisions in a tailored manner and the potential of emphasizing burden sharing as an effective strategy for addressing intergroup hostilities and fostering sustainable peace.
Text
Political Psychology - 2024 - Godefroidt - Bearing the burden of peace Intergroup attribution bias and public support for
- Version of Record
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 June 2024
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Political Psychology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society of Political Psychology.
Keywords:
conflict, experiment, international conflicts, peace studies
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502104
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502104
ISSN: 1467-9221
PURE UUID: ed103a95-428d-4781-ab02-109bc567a2fd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jun 2025 17:07
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Amélie Godefroidt
Author:
Lala Muradova
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics