The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom

Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom
Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom

Introduction: carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) face a range of complex needs, including medical, emotional, social and practical challenges, often exacerbated by social isolation and barriers to accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) addresses these needs by increasing access to non-clinical support and services. However, existing research lacks detailed descriptions of SP interventions for carers of PLWD, with limited understanding of the needs they target, the reasons for participation, their effectiveness and their potential to improve outcomes for carers of PLWD. 

Methods: a complex intervention systematic review of SP for carers of PLWD was undertaken using iterative logic modelling and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. 

Results: fifty-two studies were included. Findings indicated SP for carers of PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and operates in a largely uncoordinated process involving initiation by diverse stakeholders and institutions across multiple sectors. The classification of SP interventions for carers of PLWD is inconsistent, and participation is often opportunistic. Positive outcomes included improved carer mood, social connections, practical support, quality of life and better PLWD–carer relationships. However, negative outcomes were associated with intervention suitability, emotional impact, relevance and strained PLWD–carer relationships. 

Discussion: while the evidence suggests SP is a promising intervention for carers of PLWD, its long-term impacts, challenges of tailoring prescriptions to carers' needs and overcoming logistical issues remain. Additionally, further research is required to evaluate long-term impact, investigate specific mechanisms to tailor SP to specific carer needs and explore in greater detail the PLWD–carer relationship and its effects on SP uptake and maintenance. 

Patient and public contributions: A PPI advisory group was involved in the review, including providing insights into review questions, the logic model, findings and results. The group consisted of one person living with dementia and a caregiver.

carers, dementia care, people living with dementia, primary care, social prescribing
1369-6513
Marshall, Jessica
623e5aab-894a-463f-bc00-0bca22c5b284
Papavasiliou, Evie
4e934d4a-8ae8-4631-b9c8-72a7cedef104
Allan, Louise
df296d78-d534-478f-bc38-1c3fdc4c4933
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Fox, Chris
17ab5ffb-bba0-40b2-95a8-83274af25af6
Hawkes, Matthew
6cee819f-8632-45e8-8611-77cbc90d9c40
Irvine, Anne
9da08123-e1e2-44d3-a3a7-cc91437190c8
Moniz-Cook, Esme
eeab94d0-c712-424f-919c-da1a42490735
Pick, Aimee
90869a34-f73e-4d8c-8dff-b24ac1f7310b
Polley, Marie
be8888b6-af36-49b3-965b-bf1f783d05b7
Rathbone, Amy
1a0d15d4-eb8a-431c-a76b-32a4b47490ef
Reeve, Joanne
b8167ecb-1dc4-4442-bfeb-1eb21745f68c
Robinson, Dame Louise
487fd8cd-e044-44b6-bbb7-8695cd7d37ab
Rook, George
417daef6-f706-45ba-b5eb-353a128f0b62
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolverson, Emma
0ab5bcac-91c6-49e8-976e-dd357434b8ac
Walker, Sarah
e0c010fd-2b9a-4305-8763-c94cc82bd1ff
Cross, Jane
51669b2b-0ab5-47c4-9e60-47a1afaa4bde
the SPLENDID Collaboration
Marshall, Jessica
623e5aab-894a-463f-bc00-0bca22c5b284
Papavasiliou, Evie
4e934d4a-8ae8-4631-b9c8-72a7cedef104
Allan, Louise
df296d78-d534-478f-bc38-1c3fdc4c4933
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Fox, Chris
17ab5ffb-bba0-40b2-95a8-83274af25af6
Hawkes, Matthew
6cee819f-8632-45e8-8611-77cbc90d9c40
Irvine, Anne
9da08123-e1e2-44d3-a3a7-cc91437190c8
Moniz-Cook, Esme
eeab94d0-c712-424f-919c-da1a42490735
Pick, Aimee
90869a34-f73e-4d8c-8dff-b24ac1f7310b
Polley, Marie
be8888b6-af36-49b3-965b-bf1f783d05b7
Rathbone, Amy
1a0d15d4-eb8a-431c-a76b-32a4b47490ef
Reeve, Joanne
b8167ecb-1dc4-4442-bfeb-1eb21745f68c
Robinson, Dame Louise
487fd8cd-e044-44b6-bbb7-8695cd7d37ab
Rook, George
417daef6-f706-45ba-b5eb-353a128f0b62
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolverson, Emma
0ab5bcac-91c6-49e8-976e-dd357434b8ac
Walker, Sarah
e0c010fd-2b9a-4305-8763-c94cc82bd1ff
Cross, Jane
51669b2b-0ab5-47c4-9e60-47a1afaa4bde

Marshall, Jessica, Papavasiliou, Evie, Allan, Louise, Bradbury, Katherine, Fox, Chris, Hawkes, Matthew, Irvine, Anne, Moniz-Cook, Esme, Pick, Aimee, Polley, Marie, Rathbone, Amy, Reeve, Joanne, Robinson, Dame Louise, Rook, George, Sadler, Euan, Wolverson, Emma, Walker, Sarah and Cross, Jane , the SPLENDID Collaboration (2025) Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom. Health Expectations, 28 (3), [e70286]. (doi:10.1111/hex.70286).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Introduction: carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) face a range of complex needs, including medical, emotional, social and practical challenges, often exacerbated by social isolation and barriers to accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) addresses these needs by increasing access to non-clinical support and services. However, existing research lacks detailed descriptions of SP interventions for carers of PLWD, with limited understanding of the needs they target, the reasons for participation, their effectiveness and their potential to improve outcomes for carers of PLWD. 

Methods: a complex intervention systematic review of SP for carers of PLWD was undertaken using iterative logic modelling and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Gough's Weight of Evidence Framework was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. 

Results: fifty-two studies were included. Findings indicated SP for carers of PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and operates in a largely uncoordinated process involving initiation by diverse stakeholders and institutions across multiple sectors. The classification of SP interventions for carers of PLWD is inconsistent, and participation is often opportunistic. Positive outcomes included improved carer mood, social connections, practical support, quality of life and better PLWD–carer relationships. However, negative outcomes were associated with intervention suitability, emotional impact, relevance and strained PLWD–carer relationships. 

Discussion: while the evidence suggests SP is a promising intervention for carers of PLWD, its long-term impacts, challenges of tailoring prescriptions to carers' needs and overcoming logistical issues remain. Additionally, further research is required to evaluate long-term impact, investigate specific mechanisms to tailor SP to specific carer needs and explore in greater detail the PLWD–carer relationship and its effects on SP uptake and maintenance. 

Patient and public contributions: A PPI advisory group was involved in the review, including providing insights into review questions, the logic model, findings and results. The group consisted of one person living with dementia and a caregiver.

Text
Health Expectations - 2025 - Marshall - Reimagining Dementia Care A Complex Intervention Systematic Review on Optimising - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 April 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 10 May 2025
Published date: 10 May 2025
Keywords: carers, dementia care, people living with dementia, primary care, social prescribing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502124
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502124
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: 1893c8b6-2540-43c4-a9d6-268890e91e27
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Jun 2025 16:34
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jessica Marshall
Author: Evie Papavasiliou
Author: Louise Allan
Author: Chris Fox
Author: Matthew Hawkes
Author: Anne Irvine
Author: Esme Moniz-Cook
Author: Aimee Pick
Author: Marie Polley
Author: Amy Rathbone
Author: Joanne Reeve
Author: Dame Louise Robinson
Author: George Rook
Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Emma Wolverson
Author: Sarah Walker
Author: Jane Cross
Corporate Author: the SPLENDID Collaboration

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×