The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom

Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom
Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom

Introduction: Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex needs, exacerbated by social isolation and difficulty accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) has been increasingly integrated into the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) as a means to connect individuals with non-clinical services to address these challenges. However, current research provides limited detail on specific SP interventions tailored to dementia care, leaving gaps in understanding the targeted needs, participation drivers, effectiveness and potential benefits for PLWD. Methods: A complex intervention systematic review of SP in dementia care was performed in the United Kingdom using an iterative logic model approach. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching for reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough's Evidence of Framework. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Results: Forty-nine studies, reporting on PLWD, met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that SP for PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and lacks focus, reflecting the diverse demographics involved. Interventions encompass cognitive, educational, psychosocial, physical, community and complementary therapies, of inconsistent classification, with some being umbrella interventions and others standalone services. Provided by the NHS, charities and integrated services, SP involves a range of referrers and connectors. Finally, individual outcomes show benefits such as increased independence and improved mood, but challenges pertaining to suitability and logistical issues, whereas systemic outcomes include cost savings and better service delivery, despite high implementation costs. Conclusion: SP pathways for PLWD are varied, with success relying heavily on adequately resourced and trained connectors. While benefits extend beyond health improvements, further research is needed to assess long-term impacts, refine mechanisms and standardise evaluation metrics for SP effectiveness in dementia care. Patient and Public Contributions: A PPI advisory group, consisting of a person living with dementia and a caregiver, was actively involved throughout the review process, providing insights into the review questions, the logic model, emerging findings and interpretation of results.

dementia care, health services, people living with dementia, primary care, social prescribing
1369-6513
Papavasiliou, Evie
e4280ddb-18f7-48b8-bd70-4f632fd0613e
Marshall, Jessica
b0712b9f-e9a3-46d5-878d-501abdcc7862
Allan, Louise
df296d78-d534-478f-bc38-1c3fdc4c4933
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Fox, Chris
17ab5ffb-bba0-40b2-95a8-83274af25af6
Hawkes, Matthew
6cee819f-8632-45e8-8611-77cbc90d9c40
Irvine, Anne
a9a9aaa6-2999-4c40-a729-5efebbf0733c
Moniz-Cook, Esme
eeab94d0-c712-424f-919c-da1a42490735
Pick, Aimee
39e7da22-e16e-4f01-9795-94d9d32992d5
Polley, Marie
3cd013f3-d1d9-4a05-a022-3e4eaca9fae9
Rathbone, Amy
1a0d15d4-eb8a-431c-a76b-32a4b47490ef
Reeve, Joanne
a1c2b34c-ac57-40d8-8156-34bf7d2774ee
Robinson, Dame Louise
487fd8cd-e044-44b6-bbb7-8695cd7d37ab
Rook, George
73dca739-33a4-470e-a80d-8297a5735716
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolverson, Emma
0ab5bcac-91c6-49e8-976e-dd357434b8ac
Walker, Sarah
40d315ef-ffb5-4b75-9d29-b5c05a1d2581
Cross, Jane
fe92657d-ee48-4ab8-a220-6e89aa1b6045
the SPLENDID Collaboration
Papavasiliou, Evie
e4280ddb-18f7-48b8-bd70-4f632fd0613e
Marshall, Jessica
b0712b9f-e9a3-46d5-878d-501abdcc7862
Allan, Louise
df296d78-d534-478f-bc38-1c3fdc4c4933
Bradbury, Katherine
87fce0b9-d9c5-42b4-b041-bffeb4430863
Fox, Chris
17ab5ffb-bba0-40b2-95a8-83274af25af6
Hawkes, Matthew
6cee819f-8632-45e8-8611-77cbc90d9c40
Irvine, Anne
a9a9aaa6-2999-4c40-a729-5efebbf0733c
Moniz-Cook, Esme
eeab94d0-c712-424f-919c-da1a42490735
Pick, Aimee
39e7da22-e16e-4f01-9795-94d9d32992d5
Polley, Marie
3cd013f3-d1d9-4a05-a022-3e4eaca9fae9
Rathbone, Amy
1a0d15d4-eb8a-431c-a76b-32a4b47490ef
Reeve, Joanne
a1c2b34c-ac57-40d8-8156-34bf7d2774ee
Robinson, Dame Louise
487fd8cd-e044-44b6-bbb7-8695cd7d37ab
Rook, George
73dca739-33a4-470e-a80d-8297a5735716
Sadler, Euan
e5891abe-c97b-4e74-b9b3-6d7c43435360
Wolverson, Emma
0ab5bcac-91c6-49e8-976e-dd357434b8ac
Walker, Sarah
40d315ef-ffb5-4b75-9d29-b5c05a1d2581
Cross, Jane
fe92657d-ee48-4ab8-a220-6e89aa1b6045

Papavasiliou, Evie, Marshall, Jessica, Allan, Louise, Bradbury, Katherine, Fox, Chris, Hawkes, Matthew, Irvine, Anne, Moniz-Cook, Esme, Pick, Aimee, Polley, Marie, Rathbone, Amy, Reeve, Joanne, Robinson, Dame Louise, Rook, George, Sadler, Euan, Wolverson, Emma, Walker, Sarah and Cross, Jane , the SPLENDID Collaboration (2025) Reimagining dementia care: a complex intervention systematic review on optimising social prescribing (SP) for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the United Kingdom. Health Expectations, 28 (3), [e70289]. (doi:10.1111/hex.70289).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Introduction: Dementia is a complex medical condition that poses significant challenges to healthcare systems and support services. People living with dementia (PLWD) often face complex needs, exacerbated by social isolation and difficulty accessing support. Social prescribing (SP) has been increasingly integrated into the United Kingdom's National Health Service (NHS) as a means to connect individuals with non-clinical services to address these challenges. However, current research provides limited detail on specific SP interventions tailored to dementia care, leaving gaps in understanding the targeted needs, participation drivers, effectiveness and potential benefits for PLWD. Methods: A complex intervention systematic review of SP in dementia care was performed in the United Kingdom using an iterative logic model approach. Six databases and grey literature were searched, supplemented by hand searching for reference lists of included studies. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction. Risk of bias was assessed using Gough's Evidence of Framework. Reporting was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-CI) extension statement and checklist. Results: Forty-nine studies, reporting on PLWD, met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that SP for PLWD in the United Kingdom is varied and lacks focus, reflecting the diverse demographics involved. Interventions encompass cognitive, educational, psychosocial, physical, community and complementary therapies, of inconsistent classification, with some being umbrella interventions and others standalone services. Provided by the NHS, charities and integrated services, SP involves a range of referrers and connectors. Finally, individual outcomes show benefits such as increased independence and improved mood, but challenges pertaining to suitability and logistical issues, whereas systemic outcomes include cost savings and better service delivery, despite high implementation costs. Conclusion: SP pathways for PLWD are varied, with success relying heavily on adequately resourced and trained connectors. While benefits extend beyond health improvements, further research is needed to assess long-term impacts, refine mechanisms and standardise evaluation metrics for SP effectiveness in dementia care. Patient and Public Contributions: A PPI advisory group, consisting of a person living with dementia and a caregiver, was actively involved throughout the review process, providing insights into the review questions, the logic model, emerging findings and interpretation of results.

Text
Health Expectations - 2025 - Papavasiliou - Reimagining Dementia Care A Complex Intervention Systematic Review on - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 April 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 May 2025
Published date: 12 May 2025
Keywords: dementia care, health services, people living with dementia, primary care, social prescribing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502195
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502195
ISSN: 1369-6513
PURE UUID: f136300e-c771-49ca-8698-d16b5c77b2c1
ORCID for Katherine Bradbury: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5513-7571
ORCID for Euan Sadler: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jun 2025 16:32
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Evie Papavasiliou
Author: Jessica Marshall
Author: Louise Allan
Author: Chris Fox
Author: Matthew Hawkes
Author: Anne Irvine
Author: Esme Moniz-Cook
Author: Aimee Pick
Author: Marie Polley
Author: Amy Rathbone
Author: Joanne Reeve
Author: Dame Louise Robinson
Author: George Rook
Author: Euan Sadler ORCID iD
Author: Emma Wolverson
Author: Sarah Walker
Author: Jane Cross
Corporate Author: the SPLENDID Collaboration

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×