The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Contrasting cultures of emergency department care: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department for low back pain in the UK

Contrasting cultures of emergency department care: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department for low back pain in the UK
Contrasting cultures of emergency department care: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department for low back pain in the UK
Objectives This article aimed to explore patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department (ED) for low back pain (LBP) and provides a theoretically informed analysis of the ED cultures perceived by patients to inform their experiences of care.

Design Multisite, cross-sectional qualitative interview study.

Setting Four NHS Emergency Departments located in the UK.

Participants 47 adults (aged 23–79 years) who, in the past 6 weeks, had attended the ED for LBP (all types and durations). Purposive sampling was used to gain variation in the recruiting sites, and participants’ LBP and demographic characteristics.

Interventions Data were collected using individual, semistructured, telephone interviews (median 45 min duration) which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was informed using reflexive thematic analysis and ideal type analysis. Cycles of inductive and deductive analysis were undertaken, with Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus employed to help explain the findings.

Results We present three contrasting cultures of ED care for LBP, comprising (1) emergency screening only, (2) ‘cynicism and neglect’ and (3) appropriate and kind care. Taking each culture (field) in turn, we explore important differences in the content and delivery of care. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, we consider the social and institutional norms and misrepresentations likely to underpin the thoughts and behaviours of ED staff (their habitus), and why these tended to vary based on where and by whom the patient was managed in the ED.

Conclusions Strategies to improve patients’ experience need to review the social and institutional norms that underpin staff habitus, the assumptions informing these norms and the voices that validate and reproduce them.
2044-6055
Ryan, Clare
8be9d4a9-deb0-450b-8207-24f2190a2d92
Pope, Catherine
6ad89c6c-f326-4e6f-9e38-ff7a7afec724
Roberts, Lisa
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0
Ryan, Clare
8be9d4a9-deb0-450b-8207-24f2190a2d92
Pope, Catherine
6ad89c6c-f326-4e6f-9e38-ff7a7afec724
Roberts, Lisa
0a937943-5246-4877-bd6b-4dcd172b5cd0

Ryan, Clare, Pope, Catherine and Roberts, Lisa (2025) Contrasting cultures of emergency department care: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department for low back pain in the UK. BMJ Open, 15 (5), [e091158]. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091158).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives This article aimed to explore patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department (ED) for low back pain (LBP) and provides a theoretically informed analysis of the ED cultures perceived by patients to inform their experiences of care.

Design Multisite, cross-sectional qualitative interview study.

Setting Four NHS Emergency Departments located in the UK.

Participants 47 adults (aged 23–79 years) who, in the past 6 weeks, had attended the ED for LBP (all types and durations). Purposive sampling was used to gain variation in the recruiting sites, and participants’ LBP and demographic characteristics.

Interventions Data were collected using individual, semistructured, telephone interviews (median 45 min duration) which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was informed using reflexive thematic analysis and ideal type analysis. Cycles of inductive and deductive analysis were undertaken, with Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus employed to help explain the findings.

Results We present three contrasting cultures of ED care for LBP, comprising (1) emergency screening only, (2) ‘cynicism and neglect’ and (3) appropriate and kind care. Taking each culture (field) in turn, we explore important differences in the content and delivery of care. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, we consider the social and institutional norms and misrepresentations likely to underpin the thoughts and behaviours of ED staff (their habitus), and why these tended to vary based on where and by whom the patient was managed in the ED.

Conclusions Strategies to improve patients’ experience need to review the social and institutional norms that underpin staff habitus, the assumptions informing these norms and the voices that validate and reproduce them.

Text
e091158.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (327kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 April 2025
Published date: 11 May 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502307
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502307
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: a709ff5f-c62c-4a89-8183-095f4219aec0
ORCID for Clare Ryan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-8624
ORCID for Lisa Roberts: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-6696

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jun 2025 17:00
Last modified: 11 Sep 2025 03:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Clare Ryan ORCID iD
Author: Catherine Pope
Author: Lisa Roberts ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×