Implicit Bias in the Recruitment of Racially Diverse Trainee Clinical Psychologists in the UK
Implicit Bias in the Recruitment of Racially Diverse Trainee Clinical Psychologists in the UK
This dataset was created as part of a doctoral thesis investigating unconscious bias in Clinical Psychology selection.
The study explored the effect of candidate race and brief unconscious bias training on mock interview ratings given by participants eligible to be DClinPsy selection panellists.
Participants were randomly allocated to one of four conditions (2 × 2 design: Candidate Race × Training) and completed:
- an experience and demographic questionnaire
- pre-interview implicit bias measures (Asian-White IAT and Bodyweight IAT)
- pre-interview self-report questions on unconscious bias awareness
They then observed a mock interview before:
- scoring the candidate across domains (Personal, Academic, Research, Clinical)
- completing post-interview measures (implicit bias and awareness questions repeated, with three additional training evaluation questions)
Data were collected using Qualtrics and the Implicitly online platform.
All personal data (e.g., email addresses) were stored securely and separately from the research dataset. Only anonymised data are included here.
This dataset contains:
- An Excel .xlsx file of anonymised participant data (rather than SPSS, to allow full descriptive labelling and transparency)
- A comprehensive codebook describing each variable, coding scheme, and notes on data processing
Data includes:
- Demographics and experience
- Experimental condition allocation
- IAT scores and labels (pre and post)
- Awareness and knowledge items (pre and post)
- Training evaluation questions (training groups only)
- Interview ratings and placement recommendations
Anonymisation & Processing Notes:
The dataset is fully anonymised. All personally identifying information (e.g., email addresses, participant IDs, timestamps) was removed.
Variables that could contribute to indirect identification (e.g., exact years of panellist experience) were collapsed or excluded.
The data file was created in Excel to allow detailed variable descriptions and overcome SPSS label length constraints.
A full codebook is provided to support interpretation of the dataset.
University of Southampton
Cockburn, Sarah-Jane
996a2094-4872-4b6d-843f-f432d7b6efaa
Hodgkinson, Melanie
72964a09-0d9c-4941-91ee-a37d33a81d7b
Brignell, Catherine
ec44ecae-8687-4bbb-bc81-8c2c8f27febd
Cockburn, Sarah-Jane
996a2094-4872-4b6d-843f-f432d7b6efaa
Hodgkinson, Melanie
72964a09-0d9c-4941-91ee-a37d33a81d7b
Brignell, Catherine
ec44ecae-8687-4bbb-bc81-8c2c8f27febd
Cockburn, Sarah-Jane, Hodgkinson, Melanie and Brignell, Catherine
(2025)
Implicit Bias in the Recruitment of Racially Diverse Trainee Clinical Psychologists in the UK.
University of Southampton
doi:10.5258/SOTON/D3565
[Dataset]
Abstract
This dataset was created as part of a doctoral thesis investigating unconscious bias in Clinical Psychology selection.
The study explored the effect of candidate race and brief unconscious bias training on mock interview ratings given by participants eligible to be DClinPsy selection panellists.
Participants were randomly allocated to one of four conditions (2 × 2 design: Candidate Race × Training) and completed:
- an experience and demographic questionnaire
- pre-interview implicit bias measures (Asian-White IAT and Bodyweight IAT)
- pre-interview self-report questions on unconscious bias awareness
They then observed a mock interview before:
- scoring the candidate across domains (Personal, Academic, Research, Clinical)
- completing post-interview measures (implicit bias and awareness questions repeated, with three additional training evaluation questions)
Data were collected using Qualtrics and the Implicitly online platform.
All personal data (e.g., email addresses) were stored securely and separately from the research dataset. Only anonymised data are included here.
This dataset contains:
- An Excel .xlsx file of anonymised participant data (rather than SPSS, to allow full descriptive labelling and transparency)
- A comprehensive codebook describing each variable, coding scheme, and notes on data processing
Data includes:
- Demographics and experience
- Experimental condition allocation
- IAT scores and labels (pre and post)
- Awareness and knowledge items (pre and post)
- Training evaluation questions (training groups only)
- Interview ratings and placement recommendations
Anonymisation & Processing Notes:
The dataset is fully anonymised. All personally identifying information (e.g., email addresses, participant IDs, timestamps) was removed.
Variables that could contribute to indirect identification (e.g., exact years of panellist experience) were collapsed or excluded.
The data file was created in Excel to allow detailed variable descriptions and overcome SPSS label length constraints.
A full codebook is provided to support interpretation of the dataset.
Spreadsheet
Implicit_Bias_in_the_Recruitment_of_Racially_Diverse_Trainee_Clinical_Psychologists_in_the_UK_Dataset.xlsx
- Dataset
Text
Implicit_Bias_in_the_Recruitment_of_Racially_Diverse_Trainee_Clinical_Psychologists_in_the_UK_Dataset_Codebook.pdf
- Dataset
Text
3._PROLIFIC_PIS_and_Consent_Combined_V1_FOR_DEPOSIT.pdf
- Text
Text
3._Qualtircs_PIS_and_Consent_Combined_V4_FOR_DEPOSIT.pdf
- Text
Text
README_File_Implicit_Bias_in_DClinPsy_Recruitment_with_DOI.txt
- Dataset
Show all 5 downloads.
More information
Published date: 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502429
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502429
PURE UUID: 72bcbcdf-8ca9-4018-a365-d72d0b887fea
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Jun 2025 16:31
Last modified: 27 Jun 2025 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Creator:
Sarah-Jane Cockburn
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics