The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Potentially inappropriate prescribing and falls-risk increasing drugs in people who have experienced a fall; a systematic review and meta-analysis

Potentially inappropriate prescribing and falls-risk increasing drugs in people who have experienced a fall; a systematic review and meta-analysis
Potentially inappropriate prescribing and falls-risk increasing drugs in people who have experienced a fall; a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: as certain medications increase risk of falls, it is important to review and optimise prescribing in those who have fallen to reduce risk of recurrent falls.

Objectives: to systematically review evidence on the prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), including falls-risk increasing drug (FRID) use, in fallers.

Methods: a systematic search was conducted in July 2024 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar using keywords for fall events, inappropriate prescribing, and FRIDs. Observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, before-after) and randomised trials were included. Studies were eligible where participants had experienced a fall and PIP (including FRID use) was reported. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool prevalence of inappropriate prescribing and mean number of inappropriate prescriptions across studies, with stratified analysis to assess heterogeneity.

Results: fifty papers reporting 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies assessed FRIDs, and twenty-nine assessed other PIP. The prevalence of PIP at the time of the fall was reported in 43 studies, and the pooled estimate was 68.6% (95%CI 66.1-71.2%). Among 23 studies reporting it, the mean number of inappropriate prescriptions per participant was 2.21 (95%CI 1.98-2.45). The most common FRIDs prescribed were sedatives/hypnotics, opioids, diuretics, and antidepressants. Twenty-one studies assessed changes in PIP prevalence post-fall; nine reported decreasing prevalence, with others noting increases/no change/mixed results.

Conclusion: inappropriate prescribing is highly prevalent among fallers, with cardiovascular and psychotropic drugs being the most common. This suggests significant scope to optimise medicines use in these patients to potentially reduce falls risk and improve outcomes.
medRxiv
O’Reilly, Tim
849d96eb-063e-4743-9d51-cba6daa62c5a
Lemus, Jessica Gómez
84022c5a-ae00-4203-90ae-1632fa726c39
Booth, Laura
adebff48-62b1-4416-be3d-5e2eb77d99b1
Clyne, Barbara
72f0d063-cd4e-4441-b5da-eb7230d8d655
McCarthy, Caroline
b96aa8fc-03af-4d98-92a6-c1142b228940
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Thompson, Wade
fa90e0b7-c5af-4eef-a18e-a70c2ed29b62
McAuliffe, Christine
51bd7eed-5961-4875-9b4a-8dd90a4e8ceb
Moriarty, Frank
5835f1ca-fa96-4d76-b4d5-5e4fe2e1d4b4
O’Reilly, Tim
849d96eb-063e-4743-9d51-cba6daa62c5a
Lemus, Jessica Gómez
84022c5a-ae00-4203-90ae-1632fa726c39
Booth, Laura
adebff48-62b1-4416-be3d-5e2eb77d99b1
Clyne, Barbara
72f0d063-cd4e-4441-b5da-eb7230d8d655
McCarthy, Caroline
b96aa8fc-03af-4d98-92a6-c1142b228940
Ibrahim, Kinda
54f027ad-0599-4dd4-bdbf-b9307841a294
Thompson, Wade
fa90e0b7-c5af-4eef-a18e-a70c2ed29b62
McAuliffe, Christine
51bd7eed-5961-4875-9b4a-8dd90a4e8ceb
Moriarty, Frank
5835f1ca-fa96-4d76-b4d5-5e4fe2e1d4b4

[Unknown type: UNSPECIFIED]

Record type: UNSPECIFIED

Abstract

Background: as certain medications increase risk of falls, it is important to review and optimise prescribing in those who have fallen to reduce risk of recurrent falls.

Objectives: to systematically review evidence on the prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP), including falls-risk increasing drug (FRID) use, in fallers.

Methods: a systematic search was conducted in July 2024 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar using keywords for fall events, inappropriate prescribing, and FRIDs. Observational studies (cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, before-after) and randomised trials were included. Studies were eligible where participants had experienced a fall and PIP (including FRID use) was reported. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to pool prevalence of inappropriate prescribing and mean number of inappropriate prescriptions across studies, with stratified analysis to assess heterogeneity.

Results: fifty papers reporting 46 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies assessed FRIDs, and twenty-nine assessed other PIP. The prevalence of PIP at the time of the fall was reported in 43 studies, and the pooled estimate was 68.6% (95%CI 66.1-71.2%). Among 23 studies reporting it, the mean number of inappropriate prescriptions per participant was 2.21 (95%CI 1.98-2.45). The most common FRIDs prescribed were sedatives/hypnotics, opioids, diuretics, and antidepressants. Twenty-one studies assessed changes in PIP prevalence post-fall; nine reported decreasing prevalence, with others noting increases/no change/mixed results.

Conclusion: inappropriate prescribing is highly prevalent among fallers, with cardiovascular and psychotropic drugs being the most common. This suggests significant scope to optimise medicines use in these patients to potentially reduce falls risk and improve outcomes.

Text
2025.04.07.25325256v1.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (816kB)

More information

Published date: 7 April 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502524
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502524
PURE UUID: 151ff46c-85bb-484e-bf9d-b74aeba5a414
ORCID for Kinda Ibrahim: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5709-3867

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Jun 2025 17:00
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:10

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Tim O’Reilly
Author: Jessica Gómez Lemus
Author: Laura Booth
Author: Barbara Clyne
Author: Caroline McCarthy
Author: Kinda Ibrahim ORCID iD
Author: Wade Thompson
Author: Christine McAuliffe
Author: Frank Moriarty

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×