The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pragmatic alternatives and social meaning

Pragmatic alternatives and social meaning
Pragmatic alternatives and social meaning
The notion that an utterance’s meaning in context depends not just on its entailments but also on what could have been said instead – that is, on pragmatic alternatives – is a key insight of pragmatic theory and has been employed fruitfully in accounting for central pragmatic phenomena like implicature. In this article we show why and how alternatives not only play a crucial role in familiar cases of implicature (e.g., some +> ‘not all’), but engender social meaning as well. Incorporating sociolinguistic theory and perspectives, we present a sociopragmatic framework that generalizes insights about alternatives in inference from previous pragmatic research. Then, taking as our empirical focus singular expressions of the form the X where an alternative like my/your X would be felicitous, we demonstrate the utility and broad scope of this framework. As we show, alternatives are crucial to interpretation and inference very generally, whether dealing in morphosyntactic objects or phonetics, situation descriptions or social meanings.
0378-2166
42-52
Acton, Eric
8eead435-bac9-4567-bc87-9e53e611ecae
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134
Acton, Eric
8eead435-bac9-4567-bc87-9e53e611ecae
Hunt, Matthew
bbe04f7d-80d0-4e89-ab04-56c4f8bab134

Acton, Eric and Hunt, Matthew (2025) Pragmatic alternatives and social meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 243, 42-52. (doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2025.05.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The notion that an utterance’s meaning in context depends not just on its entailments but also on what could have been said instead – that is, on pragmatic alternatives – is a key insight of pragmatic theory and has been employed fruitfully in accounting for central pragmatic phenomena like implicature. In this article we show why and how alternatives not only play a crucial role in familiar cases of implicature (e.g., some +> ‘not all’), but engender social meaning as well. Incorporating sociolinguistic theory and perspectives, we present a sociopragmatic framework that generalizes insights about alternatives in inference from previous pragmatic research. Then, taking as our empirical focus singular expressions of the form the X where an alternative like my/your X would be felicitous, we demonstrate the utility and broad scope of this framework. As we show, alternatives are crucial to interpretation and inference very generally, whether dealing in morphosyntactic objects or phonetics, situation descriptions or social meanings.

Text
jop-alternatives-r - Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 May 2026.
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 1 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 May 2025
Published date: 26 May 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502655
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502655
ISSN: 0378-2166
PURE UUID: 599e78ac-3df4-410c-a270-bfddca861177
ORCID for Matthew Hunt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6599-7727

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Jul 2025 16:39
Last modified: 04 Jul 2025 02:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Eric Acton
Author: Matthew Hunt ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×