Far right normalization & centrifugal affect. Evidence from the dating market
Far right normalization & centrifugal affect. Evidence from the dating market
Are radical right supporters penalized by a social norm against the radical right on the dating market? This paper investigates this question by leveraging diverse empirical sources, including a unique and behavioral visual conjoint experiment conducted in Britain and Spain. Theoretically, we argue that the radical right is accommodated within the dating market as a result of the affective spillovers among those on the center-right who view dating those from the opposing ideological bloc as more socially costly than dating their own in-bloc partners. Empirically, we test this by examining the behavior of center-right partisans and assessing whether they follow a polity-based norm which places a premium on ostracizing stigmatized parties, or a bloc-logic norm which incentivizes the rejection of out-bloc partisans. The results demonstrate that center-right partisans accommodate the radical right and are actively expected to do so by fellow in-group partisans. Any dating market penalty for radical right partisans is based on the composition of those on the dating market rather than any polity-level norm enforcement. An accommodating bloc-logic
in dating preferences among the mainstream right has large normative implications as it suggests that affective polarization and out-bloc rejection between overarching political camps contributes to facilitating the social normalization of radical right supporters who often hold preferences incompatible with liberal democracy.
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J.
e25c6280-842c-407f-a961-6472eea5d845
López Ortega, Alberto
0f023837-2bba-43b2-ab56-bef7087c790f
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J.
e25c6280-842c-407f-a961-6472eea5d845
López Ortega, Alberto
0f023837-2bba-43b2-ab56-bef7087c790f
Turnbull-Dugarte, Stuart J. and López Ortega, Alberto
(2025)
Far right normalization & centrifugal affect. Evidence from the dating market.
Journal of Politics.
(doi:10.1086/736698).
(In Press)
Abstract
Are radical right supporters penalized by a social norm against the radical right on the dating market? This paper investigates this question by leveraging diverse empirical sources, including a unique and behavioral visual conjoint experiment conducted in Britain and Spain. Theoretically, we argue that the radical right is accommodated within the dating market as a result of the affective spillovers among those on the center-right who view dating those from the opposing ideological bloc as more socially costly than dating their own in-bloc partners. Empirically, we test this by examining the behavior of center-right partisans and assessing whether they follow a polity-based norm which places a premium on ostracizing stigmatized parties, or a bloc-logic norm which incentivizes the rejection of out-bloc partisans. The results demonstrate that center-right partisans accommodate the radical right and are actively expected to do so by fellow in-group partisans. Any dating market penalty for radical right partisans is based on the composition of those on the dating market rather than any polity-level norm enforcement. An accommodating bloc-logic
in dating preferences among the mainstream right has large normative implications as it suggests that affective polarization and out-bloc rejection between overarching political camps contributes to facilitating the social normalization of radical right supporters who often hold preferences incompatible with liberal democracy.
Text
TurnbullDugarte_JOP_accepted
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 May 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502723
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502723
ISSN: 0022-3816
PURE UUID: 43e87136-21d4-4b7f-8c99-447dba802450
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jul 2025 16:41
Last modified: 08 Jul 2025 02:01
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alberto López Ortega
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics