On the heresthetics of salience: competing over voters attention
On the heresthetics of salience: competing over voters attention
This paper investigates a voting model in which two candidates strategically compete in a winner-take-all election setting. Voters not only consider the spatial dimension of policy positions but also evaluate other attributes, or valence, of each candidate. Candidates are policy motivated and endeavor to make specific attributes ”salient” in voters’ minds by leveraging their comparative advantages to influence the voting outcome - a form of ”heresthetic” behaviour. Our theoretical analysis characterizes the resulting Salient Political Equilibria, demonstrating that salience endogenously shifts electoral outcomes away from median voter predictions. To test these insights, we design a laboratory experiment that isolates the behavioral impact of salience and provides direct evidence of choice reversals in response to attribute framing. Finally, we exploit the 2015 European refugee crisis as a natural experiment to show that real-world political parties adapt their platforms in line with the model’s comparative statics. Taken together, the theoretical, experimental, and empirical results underscore the central role of salience in shaping electoral dynamics and offer a novel lens for understanding strategic political behavior.
Ianni, Antonella
35024f65-34cd-4e20-9b2a-554600d739f3
Marreiros, Helia
800e0f0a-9ffb-41f1-ab7d-010e5c440d43
Katsimi, Margarita
07660598-2b53-46a6-8c28-0ea635b3666e
Ianni, Antonella
35024f65-34cd-4e20-9b2a-554600d739f3
Marreiros, Helia
800e0f0a-9ffb-41f1-ab7d-010e5c440d43
Katsimi, Margarita
07660598-2b53-46a6-8c28-0ea635b3666e
Ianni, Antonella, Marreiros, Helia and Katsimi, Margarita
(2025)
On the heresthetics of salience: competing over voters attention
(Submitted)
Record type:
Monograph
(Working Paper)
Abstract
This paper investigates a voting model in which two candidates strategically compete in a winner-take-all election setting. Voters not only consider the spatial dimension of policy positions but also evaluate other attributes, or valence, of each candidate. Candidates are policy motivated and endeavor to make specific attributes ”salient” in voters’ minds by leveraging their comparative advantages to influence the voting outcome - a form of ”heresthetic” behaviour. Our theoretical analysis characterizes the resulting Salient Political Equilibria, demonstrating that salience endogenously shifts electoral outcomes away from median voter predictions. To test these insights, we design a laboratory experiment that isolates the behavioral impact of salience and provides direct evidence of choice reversals in response to attribute framing. Finally, we exploit the 2015 European refugee crisis as a natural experiment to show that real-world political parties adapt their platforms in line with the model’s comparative statics. Taken together, the theoretical, experimental, and empirical results underscore the central role of salience in shaping electoral dynamics and offer a novel lens for understanding strategic political behavior.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
In preparation date: 2024
Submitted date: 2025
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 502793
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502793
PURE UUID: 5b3a9ed5-b3b1-4f83-905b-eb8d6053e881
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 08 Jul 2025 16:46
Last modified: 09 Jul 2025 01:35
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Helia Marreiros
Author:
Margarita Katsimi
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics