The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mind the gap! Building and enhancing research capacity in a local authority through evaluation of a novel domestic abuse intervention

Mind the gap! Building and enhancing research capacity in a local authority through evaluation of a novel domestic abuse intervention
Mind the gap! Building and enhancing research capacity in a local authority through evaluation of a novel domestic abuse intervention
Background: in the UK continuous cuts to public services present a range of challenges for local authorities (LAs) and have led to an increased appetite for high quality and timely evidence to improve public health and social care outcomes and reduce inequalities. More recently, involvement and engagement of LAs in research has been identified as a strategic priority for the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) to increase research capacity and capability with the social care sector and bridge the gap between practice and academia.

While there is increased enthusiasm for research by LAs, and acknowledgement of its value to underpin policy and practice, there are barriers to its use resulting in poor take up of findings. Researcher-in residence (also known as embedded researcher) roles, which are well established in the National Health System (NHS) have been more recently introduced in LAs. These roles offer a way to bridge the academic-practice/policy gap and a mechanism for building and enhancing research capacity either as consumers, producers, stakeholders or a combination of these roles. They also offer benefits for universities in terms of maximising impact of research that is generated.

Aim: this presentation will explore the experiences of undertaking an evaluation study, as part of a LA researcher-in-residence role, of a novel intervention that provides a holistic, family-centred approach to working with families impacted by domestic abuse. Factors and processes that contribute towards generating evidence relevant to LAs to inform policy, practice and commissioning will be outlined as well as a discussion of challenges of conducting research with and within LAs.

Methods: a scoping study within the LA was undertaken to understand how domestic abuse is managed within and across services. This involved: stakeholder analysis; informal conversations with key stakeholders, and documentary analysis of relevant policy and strategy documents. Data from the scoping work was used to identify research priorities and shared at LA stakeholder meetings to gain consensus on a project. Following identification of a project, an evaluation of the domestic abuse male engagement worker intervention, funding was secured from the local NIHR Applied Research Collaboration for additional researcher time.

Researchers worked with the male engagement worker team to co-develop a protocol for a 12-month mixed-method study, gain ethics and LA approvals, facilitate access to data and identify potential participants.

Findings : within the local authority there was support for the researcher-in-residence role and the evaluation with recognition of its value to inform practice and decision-making for future commissioning. Both the researcher-in-residence and evaluation provided opportunities for partnership working between researchers and LA staff, building research capacity, and knowledge mobilisation. Undertaking the evaluation highlighted complexities for academics undertaking research with local authorities including: differing expectations and ways of working, accessing data, misaligned timelines, differing terminology, what counts as evidence.

Conclusion: the researcher-in-residence role offered an opportunity to undertake research at the boundary between academia and local government and an understanding of the organisational and relational complexities to be navigated to successfully generate evidence that can inform policy and practice decision-making.
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Lund, Susi
f0cbe041-fa1e-45bc-ad2c-f4ccb9e640e5
Taylor, Sophia
0768580c-7055-412e-bd7f-f96f0d5492eb
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f
Lund, Susi
f0cbe041-fa1e-45bc-ad2c-f4ccb9e640e5
Taylor, Sophia
0768580c-7055-412e-bd7f-f96f0d5492eb

Myall, Michelle, Lund, Susi and Taylor, Sophia (2025) Mind the gap! Building and enhancing research capacity in a local authority through evaluation of a novel domestic abuse intervention. NIHR School for Social Care Research Conference, Milner Hotel, York, United Kingdom. 20 - 21 May 2025.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Background: in the UK continuous cuts to public services present a range of challenges for local authorities (LAs) and have led to an increased appetite for high quality and timely evidence to improve public health and social care outcomes and reduce inequalities. More recently, involvement and engagement of LAs in research has been identified as a strategic priority for the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) to increase research capacity and capability with the social care sector and bridge the gap between practice and academia.

While there is increased enthusiasm for research by LAs, and acknowledgement of its value to underpin policy and practice, there are barriers to its use resulting in poor take up of findings. Researcher-in residence (also known as embedded researcher) roles, which are well established in the National Health System (NHS) have been more recently introduced in LAs. These roles offer a way to bridge the academic-practice/policy gap and a mechanism for building and enhancing research capacity either as consumers, producers, stakeholders or a combination of these roles. They also offer benefits for universities in terms of maximising impact of research that is generated.

Aim: this presentation will explore the experiences of undertaking an evaluation study, as part of a LA researcher-in-residence role, of a novel intervention that provides a holistic, family-centred approach to working with families impacted by domestic abuse. Factors and processes that contribute towards generating evidence relevant to LAs to inform policy, practice and commissioning will be outlined as well as a discussion of challenges of conducting research with and within LAs.

Methods: a scoping study within the LA was undertaken to understand how domestic abuse is managed within and across services. This involved: stakeholder analysis; informal conversations with key stakeholders, and documentary analysis of relevant policy and strategy documents. Data from the scoping work was used to identify research priorities and shared at LA stakeholder meetings to gain consensus on a project. Following identification of a project, an evaluation of the domestic abuse male engagement worker intervention, funding was secured from the local NIHR Applied Research Collaboration for additional researcher time.

Researchers worked with the male engagement worker team to co-develop a protocol for a 12-month mixed-method study, gain ethics and LA approvals, facilitate access to data and identify potential participants.

Findings : within the local authority there was support for the researcher-in-residence role and the evaluation with recognition of its value to inform practice and decision-making for future commissioning. Both the researcher-in-residence and evaluation provided opportunities for partnership working between researchers and LA staff, building research capacity, and knowledge mobilisation. Undertaking the evaluation highlighted complexities for academics undertaking research with local authorities including: differing expectations and ways of working, accessing data, misaligned timelines, differing terminology, what counts as evidence.

Conclusion: the researcher-in-residence role offered an opportunity to undertake research at the boundary between academia and local government and an understanding of the organisational and relational complexities to be navigated to successfully generate evidence that can inform policy and practice decision-making.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 20 May 2025
Venue - Dates: NIHR School for Social Care Research Conference, Milner Hotel, York, United Kingdom, 2025-05-20 - 2025-05-21

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502845
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502845
PURE UUID: 7d25cc0d-361a-4cf2-a93e-3a245547ea17
ORCID for Michelle Myall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-7412
ORCID for Sophia Taylor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-5647

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Jul 2025 16:38
Last modified: 11 Jul 2025 01:51

Export record

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×