The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands

Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands
Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands

Background: the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe impact on women’s birth experiences. To date, there are no studies that use both quantitative and qualitative data to compare women’s birth experiences before and during the pandemic, across more than one country. 

Aim: to examine women’s birth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare the experiences of women who gave birth in the United Kingdom (UK) or the Netherlands (NL) either before or during the pandemic. 

Method: this study is based on analyses of quantitative and qualitative data from the online Babies Born Better survey. Responses recorded by women giving birth in the UK and the NL between June and December 2020 have been used, encompassing women who gave birth between 2017 and 2020. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and chi-squared tests were performed to compare women who gave birth pre- versus during pandemic and separately by country. Qualitative data was analysed by inductive thematic analysis. 

Findings: respondents in both the UK and the NL who gave birth during the pandemic were as likely, or, if they had a self-reported above average standard of life, more likely to rate their labour and birth experience positively when compared to women who gave birth pre-pandemic. This was despite the fact that those labouring in the pandemic reported a lack of support and limits placed on freedom of choice. Two potential explanatory themes were identified in the qualitative data: respondents had lower expectations of care during the pandemic, and they appreciated the efforts of staff to give individualised care, despite the rules. 

Conclusion: our study implies that many women labouring during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced restrictions, but their experience was mitigated by staff actions. However, personalised care should not be maintained by the good will of care providers, but should be a priority in maternity care policy to benefit all service users equitably.

1932-6203
van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
0cbcdcd6-d7ad-4c8e-8c1f-dc8e538cba99
Akooji, Naseerah
98cf178c-f0fb-4344-a35f-2c9efca44264
Thomson, Gill
a7a6842d-0137-4160-80c7-0e069b20c488
de Jonge, Ank
94fee0ab-2d06-489c-bc41-f69648e65b49
Balaam, Marie Clare
a99ae115-aa24-4c0d-a270-7f3959d07b95
Topalidou, Anastasia
d5a8fb34-ac9f-42c4-91b2-88caab1c9f65
Downe, Soo
2971aa65-e72b-40eb-b7ef-da546f224cba
Ellison, George
a9404b47-246d-4522-9b28-3f0bc48f8b6f
Fenton, Alan
6ad01c3e-d0ed-4d07-8892-ab517cad50dd
Heazell, Alexander
65a70166-8575-44d6-9e2a-066aa166923b
Kingdon, Carol
0aa77fe5-b9fc-4e4b-b612-72fce098a33e
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Severns, Alexandra
166da2a3-42e6-499a-b3c7-6a8e2c7d8d76
Wright, Alison
158f7014-ab90-408e-94b1-49bcd2ca8ceb
Cull, Jo
382fa058-40ee-48ac-858c-f6db4bdd38bb
Cordey, Sarah
8ba2aa86-ec2c-4866-a8b9-8473cafeb0de
Crossland, Nicola
96ee551d-f382-4ff9-b34b-16695a5f622f
Feeley, Claire
b4b84eb5-5c36-4272-bfd4-35f46619fa43
Franso, Beata
875bbb63-72b3-462c-b1d6-6daf0cf63929
Heys, Steph
e8306cf8-8e15-4aeb-aa16-b0fba5caf03d
Moncrieff, Gill
ac4d66b7-988f-44d8-8fba-6f49a8a8cdbb
Nowland, Rebecca
a82fbe86-7471-4ef3-80f8-2c54e2727567
Powney, Deborah
4599e307-93cf-4659-a51a-3edcc301a128
Sarian, Arni
be992118-3725-4ae2-88a5-bc5e41418e51
Stone, Lucy
844a289d-8e83-48e3-aa68-83233ef2b63f
Tranter, Heidi
4c7c89c3-31a7-4e61-b454-4d46b06da481
Harris, Joanne
5485bc39-6e26-4264-a7a5-793a9a54d470
Booker, Maria
1766c9d2-1086-45fc-a339-b67ee1349a9f
Sandall, Jane
12cd61c5-5f93-47df-82df-d383bcbf31a0
Thornton, Jim
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9
Lynskey-Wilkie, Tisian
90ae8e80-cc7f-41da-81d9-82854b97b088
Wilson, Vanessa
aa9958ba-4468-48c7-ab90-85dc9265dbb9
Abe, Rebecca
da6fb032-6d59-460a-9872-c037dc7ac934
Awe, Tinuke
995b4948-87ce-4bbe-8d44-203335890dde
Adeyinka, Toyin
bc83d1de-abb1-4338-b3e4-39b53566000d
Bender-Atik, Ruth
8e525927-cd7a-4e01-8c3c-de3683bc72b0
Brigante, Lia
68947416-9705-4fff-8ad8-782a2b69bebb
Brione, Rebecca
c45850aa-446b-4efa-b185-1311810bfa15
Cadée, Franka
c051bc5f-4f69-4c72-aa0a-3b2a2416777b
Duff, Elizabeth
79ba6957-612f-43e6-8996-dfb91f183e55
Draycott, Tim
18f3fba9-8d0f-4b98-9ffa-30506f1d7c9f
Fisher, Duncan
81376b67-e227-42a0-8a3f-8ebabe8bb5f2
Francis, Annie
106caffd-bbec-4db5-9d20-e556f0a85cb6
Franx, Arie
2376857f-07db-4821-9512-a7b55036b6f0
Frith, Lucy
e98fc597-ea0b-4644-8202-da43d19ddeaa
Griew, Louise
892ea982-f04c-4782-bab0-afebb2667edc
Harmer, Clea
dea32148-7957-42f6-867f-e353aead7dd7
Homer, Caroline
5ca76d03-2b51-427a-aaa2-bd75f8da0b5d
Knight, Marian
6496fd31-ef02-47e6-88d0-989f4bc0f425
ASPIRE COVID-19 research team
van den Berg, Lauri M.M.
0cbcdcd6-d7ad-4c8e-8c1f-dc8e538cba99
Akooji, Naseerah
98cf178c-f0fb-4344-a35f-2c9efca44264
Thomson, Gill
a7a6842d-0137-4160-80c7-0e069b20c488
de Jonge, Ank
94fee0ab-2d06-489c-bc41-f69648e65b49
Balaam, Marie Clare
a99ae115-aa24-4c0d-a270-7f3959d07b95
Topalidou, Anastasia
d5a8fb34-ac9f-42c4-91b2-88caab1c9f65
Downe, Soo
2971aa65-e72b-40eb-b7ef-da546f224cba
Ellison, George
a9404b47-246d-4522-9b28-3f0bc48f8b6f
Fenton, Alan
6ad01c3e-d0ed-4d07-8892-ab517cad50dd
Heazell, Alexander
65a70166-8575-44d6-9e2a-066aa166923b
Kingdon, Carol
0aa77fe5-b9fc-4e4b-b612-72fce098a33e
Neal, Sarah
2b63ebf7-1cf9-423d-80a2-bd99a759f784
Matthews, Zoe
ebaee878-8cb8-415f-8aa1-3af2c3856f55
Severns, Alexandra
166da2a3-42e6-499a-b3c7-6a8e2c7d8d76
Wright, Alison
158f7014-ab90-408e-94b1-49bcd2ca8ceb
Cull, Jo
382fa058-40ee-48ac-858c-f6db4bdd38bb
Cordey, Sarah
8ba2aa86-ec2c-4866-a8b9-8473cafeb0de
Crossland, Nicola
96ee551d-f382-4ff9-b34b-16695a5f622f
Feeley, Claire
b4b84eb5-5c36-4272-bfd4-35f46619fa43
Franso, Beata
875bbb63-72b3-462c-b1d6-6daf0cf63929
Heys, Steph
e8306cf8-8e15-4aeb-aa16-b0fba5caf03d
Moncrieff, Gill
ac4d66b7-988f-44d8-8fba-6f49a8a8cdbb
Nowland, Rebecca
a82fbe86-7471-4ef3-80f8-2c54e2727567
Powney, Deborah
4599e307-93cf-4659-a51a-3edcc301a128
Sarian, Arni
be992118-3725-4ae2-88a5-bc5e41418e51
Stone, Lucy
844a289d-8e83-48e3-aa68-83233ef2b63f
Tranter, Heidi
4c7c89c3-31a7-4e61-b454-4d46b06da481
Harris, Joanne
5485bc39-6e26-4264-a7a5-793a9a54d470
Booker, Maria
1766c9d2-1086-45fc-a339-b67ee1349a9f
Sandall, Jane
12cd61c5-5f93-47df-82df-d383bcbf31a0
Thornton, Jim
9edbe61e-ce9e-4f02-9536-cedeb0257bf9
Lynskey-Wilkie, Tisian
90ae8e80-cc7f-41da-81d9-82854b97b088
Wilson, Vanessa
aa9958ba-4468-48c7-ab90-85dc9265dbb9
Abe, Rebecca
da6fb032-6d59-460a-9872-c037dc7ac934
Awe, Tinuke
995b4948-87ce-4bbe-8d44-203335890dde
Adeyinka, Toyin
bc83d1de-abb1-4338-b3e4-39b53566000d
Bender-Atik, Ruth
8e525927-cd7a-4e01-8c3c-de3683bc72b0
Brigante, Lia
68947416-9705-4fff-8ad8-782a2b69bebb
Brione, Rebecca
c45850aa-446b-4efa-b185-1311810bfa15
Cadée, Franka
c051bc5f-4f69-4c72-aa0a-3b2a2416777b
Duff, Elizabeth
79ba6957-612f-43e6-8996-dfb91f183e55
Draycott, Tim
18f3fba9-8d0f-4b98-9ffa-30506f1d7c9f
Fisher, Duncan
81376b67-e227-42a0-8a3f-8ebabe8bb5f2
Francis, Annie
106caffd-bbec-4db5-9d20-e556f0a85cb6
Franx, Arie
2376857f-07db-4821-9512-a7b55036b6f0
Frith, Lucy
e98fc597-ea0b-4644-8202-da43d19ddeaa
Griew, Louise
892ea982-f04c-4782-bab0-afebb2667edc
Harmer, Clea
dea32148-7957-42f6-867f-e353aead7dd7
Homer, Caroline
5ca76d03-2b51-427a-aaa2-bd75f8da0b5d
Knight, Marian
6496fd31-ef02-47e6-88d0-989f4bc0f425

van den Berg, Lauri M.M., Akooji, Naseerah, Thomson, Gill, de Jonge, Ank, Balaam, Marie Clare, Topalidou, Anastasia and Downe, Soo , ASPIRE COVID-19 research team (2022) Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17 (11), [e0267415]. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267415).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: the COVID-19 pandemic had a severe impact on women’s birth experiences. To date, there are no studies that use both quantitative and qualitative data to compare women’s birth experiences before and during the pandemic, across more than one country. 

Aim: to examine women’s birth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare the experiences of women who gave birth in the United Kingdom (UK) or the Netherlands (NL) either before or during the pandemic. 

Method: this study is based on analyses of quantitative and qualitative data from the online Babies Born Better survey. Responses recorded by women giving birth in the UK and the NL between June and December 2020 have been used, encompassing women who gave birth between 2017 and 2020. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and chi-squared tests were performed to compare women who gave birth pre- versus during pandemic and separately by country. Qualitative data was analysed by inductive thematic analysis. 

Findings: respondents in both the UK and the NL who gave birth during the pandemic were as likely, or, if they had a self-reported above average standard of life, more likely to rate their labour and birth experience positively when compared to women who gave birth pre-pandemic. This was despite the fact that those labouring in the pandemic reported a lack of support and limits placed on freedom of choice. Two potential explanatory themes were identified in the qualitative data: respondents had lower expectations of care during the pandemic, and they appreciated the efforts of staff to give individualised care, despite the rules. 

Conclusion: our study implies that many women labouring during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced restrictions, but their experience was mitigated by staff actions. However, personalised care should not be maintained by the good will of care providers, but should be a priority in maternity care policy to benefit all service users equitably.

Text
journal.pone.0267415 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (475kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 24 September 2022
Published date: 30 November 2022

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 502867
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/502867
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: ca1ab994-a3ec-4096-ba8f-69fe67f9e327
ORCID for Sarah Neal: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1812-7221
ORCID for Zoe Matthews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-6618

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Jul 2025 17:17
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Lauri M.M. van den Berg
Author: Naseerah Akooji
Author: Gill Thomson
Author: Ank de Jonge
Author: Marie Clare Balaam
Author: Anastasia Topalidou
Author: Soo Downe
Author: George Ellison
Author: Alan Fenton
Author: Alexander Heazell
Author: Carol Kingdon
Author: Sarah Neal ORCID iD
Author: Zoe Matthews ORCID iD
Author: Alexandra Severns
Author: Alison Wright
Author: Jo Cull
Author: Sarah Cordey
Author: Nicola Crossland
Author: Claire Feeley
Author: Beata Franso
Author: Steph Heys
Author: Gill Moncrieff
Author: Rebecca Nowland
Author: Deborah Powney
Author: Arni Sarian
Author: Lucy Stone
Author: Heidi Tranter
Author: Joanne Harris
Author: Maria Booker
Author: Jane Sandall
Author: Jim Thornton
Author: Tisian Lynskey-Wilkie
Author: Vanessa Wilson
Author: Rebecca Abe
Author: Tinuke Awe
Author: Toyin Adeyinka
Author: Ruth Bender-Atik
Author: Lia Brigante
Author: Rebecca Brione
Author: Franka Cadée
Author: Elizabeth Duff
Author: Tim Draycott
Author: Duncan Fisher
Author: Annie Francis
Author: Arie Franx
Author: Lucy Frith
Author: Louise Griew
Author: Clea Harmer
Author: Caroline Homer
Author: Marian Knight
Corporate Author: ASPIRE COVID-19 research team

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×