Maritime search and rescue in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022: an Act of deterrence?
Maritime search and rescue in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022: an Act of deterrence?
This article examines the criminalization of humanitarian search and rescue at sea in the United Kingdom under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 through the widening of the facilitation offence under Section 41, primarily by the removal of the words “for gain.” In this endeavor, it evaluates the compatibility of the NBA with the maritime search and rescue international legal framework, with particular attention to the protection of rescuers and the integrity of the maritime search and rescue system. The NBA introduces a punitive approach towards maritime search and rescue efforts not undertaken on behalf of or coordinated by His Majesty’s Coastguard or an overseas maritime search and rescue authority exercising equivalent functions. Despite the statutory exclusions and defences suggesting some protection to rescuers, the NBA amounts to an act of deterrence for rescuers to act outside the supervision of the designated authorities. Further, the statutory threat to prosecute rescuers at sea ultimately serves the unspoken purpose of tightening the detection and control of unauthorized arrivals. The analysis proposed signals the UK’s shortfalls in the compliance with its international commitments, primarily in the maritime search and rescue realm, in its pursuit to prioritize deterrence policies.
213–252
Campas Velasco, Ainhoa
4a084c88-c998-48b1-967e-8546e49aa8c0
Campas Velasco, Ainhoa
4a084c88-c998-48b1-967e-8546e49aa8c0
Campas Velasco, Ainhoa
(2024)
Maritime search and rescue in the Nationality and Borders Act 2022: an Act of deterrence?
Ocean Yearbook, 38, .
(doi:10.1163/22116001-03801010).
Abstract
This article examines the criminalization of humanitarian search and rescue at sea in the United Kingdom under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 through the widening of the facilitation offence under Section 41, primarily by the removal of the words “for gain.” In this endeavor, it evaluates the compatibility of the NBA with the maritime search and rescue international legal framework, with particular attention to the protection of rescuers and the integrity of the maritime search and rescue system. The NBA introduces a punitive approach towards maritime search and rescue efforts not undertaken on behalf of or coordinated by His Majesty’s Coastguard or an overseas maritime search and rescue authority exercising equivalent functions. Despite the statutory exclusions and defences suggesting some protection to rescuers, the NBA amounts to an act of deterrence for rescuers to act outside the supervision of the designated authorities. Further, the statutory threat to prosecute rescuers at sea ultimately serves the unspoken purpose of tightening the detection and control of unauthorized arrivals. The analysis proposed signals the UK’s shortfalls in the compliance with its international commitments, primarily in the maritime search and rescue realm, in its pursuit to prioritize deterrence policies.
Text
ocyo-article-p213_9
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 October 2023
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 June 2024
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503020
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503020
PURE UUID: cb5d8cae-bf81-4286-a01c-70b0de8c1969
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Jul 2025 16:31
Last modified: 21 Aug 2025 00:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Ainhoa Campas Velasco
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics