The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Multi-criteria decision making: sustainable water desalination

Multi-criteria decision making: sustainable water desalination
Multi-criteria decision making: sustainable water desalination
With an increasingly more urbanised global population, surface water and groundwater resources are being/have become outpaced by growing demand. The oceans could address this pertinent scarcity issue, once their high-salinity content is removed. Water desalination could thus be a crucial pathway towards addressing global water scarcity. However, conventional desalination is known to be highly energy-intensive, with limited scalability and potentially significant negative environmental impacts. Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) presents a novel approach towards sustainable water desalination based on sustainability-related criteria. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was implemented to determine the most optimal small-scale, modularised, and remote reverse osmosis (RO) desalination plant configurations. Twelve configurations were assessed, based on four plant capacities (50, 100, 150, and 200 m3/day) and three diesel-to-solar photovoltaic energy configurations (100–0%, 75–25%, and 60–40%). The hybridised diesel-to-solar configurations were generally ranked higher, particularly when less reliant on diesel, and at small(er) capacities, in terms of the criteria: sustainability, overall efficiency, and standalone potential while maintaining competitive costs. This can likely be attributed to their relatively lower fuel and energy consumption and associated costs. Further research should aim to consider additional criteria, such as battery cost, as well as life cycle assessments that include transportation-related costs/emissions.
Multi-criteria decision making, desalination, process intensification, reverse osmosis, sustainability, multi-criteria decision making
2073-4441
Li, Daniel
55e52892-4211-41a7-a4fb-ebb6b8753e2b
Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Bartram, Clara
915ee82c-79c6-4d0a-a8fd-fbea7ab999a2
Shigidi, Ihab M.T.
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b
Li, Daniel
55e52892-4211-41a7-a4fb-ebb6b8753e2b
Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Bartram, Clara
915ee82c-79c6-4d0a-a8fd-fbea7ab999a2
Shigidi, Ihab M.T.
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b

Li, Daniel, Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal, Bimbo, Nuno, Bartram, Clara and Shigidi, Ihab M.T. (2025) Multi-criteria decision making: sustainable water desalination. Water, 17 (12), [1729]. (doi:10.3390/w17121729).

Record type: Article

Abstract

With an increasingly more urbanised global population, surface water and groundwater resources are being/have become outpaced by growing demand. The oceans could address this pertinent scarcity issue, once their high-salinity content is removed. Water desalination could thus be a crucial pathway towards addressing global water scarcity. However, conventional desalination is known to be highly energy-intensive, with limited scalability and potentially significant negative environmental impacts. Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) presents a novel approach towards sustainable water desalination based on sustainability-related criteria. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was implemented to determine the most optimal small-scale, modularised, and remote reverse osmosis (RO) desalination plant configurations. Twelve configurations were assessed, based on four plant capacities (50, 100, 150, and 200 m3/day) and three diesel-to-solar photovoltaic energy configurations (100–0%, 75–25%, and 60–40%). The hybridised diesel-to-solar configurations were generally ranked higher, particularly when less reliant on diesel, and at small(er) capacities, in terms of the criteria: sustainability, overall efficiency, and standalone potential while maintaining competitive costs. This can likely be attributed to their relatively lower fuel and energy consumption and associated costs. Further research should aim to consider additional criteria, such as battery cost, as well as life cycle assessments that include transportation-related costs/emissions.

Text
water-17-01729-v2 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Submitted date: 30 April 2025
Accepted/In Press date: 4 June 2025
Published date: 7 June 2025
Keywords: Multi-criteria decision making, desalination, process intensification, reverse osmosis, sustainability, multi-criteria decision making

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503100
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503100
ISSN: 2073-4441
PURE UUID: b23132df-2ffe-4dc9-81bb-3043b88c3b58
ORCID for Daniel Li: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-0344
ORCID for Mohamed Galal Hassan-Sayed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-4543
ORCID for Nuno Bimbo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-8284

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jul 2025 16:52
Last modified: 12 Sep 2025 02:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Li ORCID iD
Author: Nuno Bimbo ORCID iD
Author: Clara Bartram
Author: Ihab M.T. Shigidi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×