The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Holistically green and sustainable pathway prioritisation for chemical process plant systems via a FAHP-TOPSIS framework

Holistically green and sustainable pathway prioritisation for chemical process plant systems via a FAHP-TOPSIS framework
Holistically green and sustainable pathway prioritisation for chemical process plant systems via a FAHP-TOPSIS framework
Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) presents a novel approach towards truly holistic green sustainability, particularly within the context of chemical process plants (CPPs). ASPEN Plus v12.0 was utilised for two representative CPP cases: isopropanol (IPA) production via isopropyl acetate, and green ammonia (NH3) production. An integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was modelled in MATLAB v24.1 to prioritise the holistically green and sustainable pathways. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) were employed to select the pathways, and the most suitable sub-criteria per the four criteria are as follows: social, economic, environmental, and technical. In descending order of optimality, the pathways were ranked as follows for green NH3 and IPA, respectively: Hydropower (HPEA) > Wind Turbine (WGEA) > Biomass Gasification (BGEA)/Solar Photovoltaic (PVEA) > Nuclear High Temperature (NTEA), and Propylene Indirect Hydration (IAH) > Direct Propylene Hydration (PH) > Acetone Hydrogenation (AH). Sensitivity analysis evaluated the FAHP–TOPSIS framework to be overall robust. However, there are potential uncertainties within and/or among sub-criteria, particularly in the social dimension, due to software and data limitations. Future research would seek to integrate FAHP with VIKOR and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE-II).
AHP, Multi-criteria decision making, TOPSIS, ammonia, isopropanol, life cycle assessment, multi-criteria decision making
2227-9717
Li, Daniel
55e52892-4211-41a7-a4fb-ebb6b8753e2b
Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Li, Zhaomin
0b0aaea3-e265-44a4-a648-8cb71bc76863
Shigidi, Ihab M.T.
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b
Li, Daniel
55e52892-4211-41a7-a4fb-ebb6b8753e2b
Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal
ce323212-f178-4d72-85cf-23cd30605cd8
Bimbo, Nuno
53d9fc24-e2c1-4e2d-8d75-8dc640d8adda
Li, Zhaomin
0b0aaea3-e265-44a4-a648-8cb71bc76863
Shigidi, Ihab M.T.
c6909a31-6709-45db-8247-3fe1b573753b

Li, Daniel, Hassan-Sayed, Mohamed Galal, Bimbo, Nuno, Li, Zhaomin and Shigidi, Ihab M.T. (2025) Holistically green and sustainable pathway prioritisation for chemical process plant systems via a FAHP-TOPSIS framework. Processes, 13 (7), [2068]. (doi:10.3390/pr13072068).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) presents a novel approach towards truly holistic green sustainability, particularly within the context of chemical process plants (CPPs). ASPEN Plus v12.0 was utilised for two representative CPP cases: isopropanol (IPA) production via isopropyl acetate, and green ammonia (NH3) production. An integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was modelled in MATLAB v24.1 to prioritise the holistically green and sustainable pathways. Life cycle assessments (LCAs) were employed to select the pathways, and the most suitable sub-criteria per the four criteria are as follows: social, economic, environmental, and technical. In descending order of optimality, the pathways were ranked as follows for green NH3 and IPA, respectively: Hydropower (HPEA) > Wind Turbine (WGEA) > Biomass Gasification (BGEA)/Solar Photovoltaic (PVEA) > Nuclear High Temperature (NTEA), and Propylene Indirect Hydration (IAH) > Direct Propylene Hydration (PH) > Acetone Hydrogenation (AH). Sensitivity analysis evaluated the FAHP–TOPSIS framework to be overall robust. However, there are potential uncertainties within and/or among sub-criteria, particularly in the social dimension, due to software and data limitations. Future research would seek to integrate FAHP with VIKOR and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE-II).

Text
processes-13-02068 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 27 June 2025
Published date: 30 June 2025
Keywords: AHP, Multi-criteria decision making, TOPSIS, ammonia, isopropanol, life cycle assessment, multi-criteria decision making

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503103
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503103
ISSN: 2227-9717
PURE UUID: e4c3e798-15ee-4bb5-a9cd-44041a5567f7
ORCID for Daniel Li: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-0344
ORCID for Mohamed Galal Hassan-Sayed: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-4543
ORCID for Nuno Bimbo: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-8284

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jul 2025 16:59
Last modified: 13 Sep 2025 02:25

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Li ORCID iD
Author: Nuno Bimbo ORCID iD
Author: Zhaomin Li
Author: Ihab M.T. Shigidi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×