Onoja, Anthony, McDonnell, Thomas, Annessi, Isabelle, Banks, Rosamonde E., Bergin, Marianne, Cockwell, Paul, Dusaulcy, Rodolphe, Fraser, Simon D.S., Kalra, Philip A., Johnson, Tim, Lemaître, Barbara, Saleem, Moin, Skroblin, Phillipp, Soderberg, Magnus, Taal, Maarten W., Unwin, Robert J., Vuilleumier, Nicolas, Wheeler, David C. and Geifman, Nophar (2025) Biomarkers of kidney failure and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, [0767]. (doi:10.1681/ASN.0000000767).
Abstract
Background:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) carries a variable risk for multiple adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for a personalised approach. This study evaluated several novel biomarkers linked to key disease mechanisms to predict the risk of kidney failure (first event of eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m 2 or kidney replacement therapy), all-cause mortality, and a composite of both.Methods:We included 2,884 adults with non-dialysis CKD from 16 nephrology centres across the UK. Twenty-one biomarkers associated with kidney damage, fibrosis, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease were analysed in urine, plasma, or serum. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess biomarker associations and develop risk prediction models.Results:Participants had mean age 63 (15) years, 58% were male and 87% White. Median eGFR 35 (25, 47) ml/min/1.73m 2, and median urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) 197 (32, 895) mg/g. During median 48 (33, 55) months follow-up, 680 kidney failure events and 414 all-cause mortality events occurred. For kidney failure, a model combining three biomarkers (sTNFR1, sCD40, UCOL1A1) showed good discrimination (c-index 0.86, 95% CI: 0.83-0.89) but was outperformed by a model using established risk factors (age, sex, ethnicity, eGFR, UACR; c-index 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92). For all-cause mortality, a model using three biomarkers (hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, suPAR) demonstrated equivalent discrimination (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.84) to an established risk factor model (c-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76-0.84).For the composite outcome, the biomarker model discrimination (C-index 0.78, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.81) was numerically higher than for established risk factors (C-index 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.80), and the addition of biomarkers to the established risk factors led to a small but statistically significant improvement in discrimination (C-index 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.82; p value < 0.01)Conclusions:Risk prediction models incorporating novel biomarkers showed comparable discrimination to established risk factors for kidney failure and all-cause mortality.
More information
Identifiers
Catalogue record
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.