Immigration and the welfare state
Immigration and the welfare state
As immigration continues to be politically salient in North America and Europe, questions about the compatibility of modern welfare states with immigration inflows remain central to public and policy debates. This article examines the empirical evidence surrounding three key questions: first, whether generous welfare systems attract immigrants disproportionately (the ‘welfare magnet hypothesis’); second, the extent to which immigrants’ net fiscal contributions are positive, negative, or neutral; and third, how public attitudes toward immigration intersect with concerns about the welfare state. Our analysis indicates that while evidence supporting the welfare magnet hypothesis exists in some contexts, its applicability depends on factors such as migrant characteristics and policy environments. Similarly, fiscal contributions vary: high-skilled immigrants generally contribute positively, while low-skilled migrants and those entering on humanitarian grounds can present short-term fiscal challenges, though these are usually mitigated by integration policies over time. However, while public attitudes and perceptions often diverge from these nuanced realities, they do not entirely correspond with perceptions of existing welfare systems as magnets for migrants or of migrants’ fiscal impacts as being overwhelmingly negative. Instead, public concerns about immigration and welfare often reflect broader socio-economic and cultural anxieties that can shape politics and policy-making despite not aligning with best-available evidence. Therefore, researchers should prioritize finding ways of bridging gaps between empirical findings and public perceptions to inform effective and balanced policies. This could be achieved, in part, by fostering more informed public discussion that acknowledges underlying anxieties, as well as implementing policies that reconcile economic sustainability with social cohesion.
fiscal impacts, immigration, immigration policy, public opinion, redistribution, welfare state
64-86
Allen, William L.
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Fernández-Reino, Mariña
10e4cff8-f646-4136-a935-aded6666bf4b
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826
6 June 2025
Allen, William L.
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Fernández-Reino, Mariña
10e4cff8-f646-4136-a935-aded6666bf4b
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826
Allen, William L., Fernández-Reino, Mariña and Ruiz, Isabel
(2025)
Immigration and the welfare state.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 41 (1), .
(doi:10.1093/oxrep/graf014).
Abstract
As immigration continues to be politically salient in North America and Europe, questions about the compatibility of modern welfare states with immigration inflows remain central to public and policy debates. This article examines the empirical evidence surrounding three key questions: first, whether generous welfare systems attract immigrants disproportionately (the ‘welfare magnet hypothesis’); second, the extent to which immigrants’ net fiscal contributions are positive, negative, or neutral; and third, how public attitudes toward immigration intersect with concerns about the welfare state. Our analysis indicates that while evidence supporting the welfare magnet hypothesis exists in some contexts, its applicability depends on factors such as migrant characteristics and policy environments. Similarly, fiscal contributions vary: high-skilled immigrants generally contribute positively, while low-skilled migrants and those entering on humanitarian grounds can present short-term fiscal challenges, though these are usually mitigated by integration policies over time. However, while public attitudes and perceptions often diverge from these nuanced realities, they do not entirely correspond with perceptions of existing welfare systems as magnets for migrants or of migrants’ fiscal impacts as being overwhelmingly negative. Instead, public concerns about immigration and welfare often reflect broader socio-economic and cultural anxieties that can shape politics and policy-making despite not aligning with best-available evidence. Therefore, researchers should prioritize finding ways of bridging gaps between empirical findings and public perceptions to inform effective and balanced policies. This could be achieved, in part, by fostering more informed public discussion that acknowledges underlying anxieties, as well as implementing policies that reconcile economic sustainability with social cohesion.
Text
graf014
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 6 June 2025
Keywords:
fiscal impacts, immigration, immigration policy, public opinion, redistribution, welfare state
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503134
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503134
ISSN: 0266-903X
PURE UUID: c8b431b5-81a2-4c2a-a05b-909a2e68229c
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 22 Jul 2025 16:44
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:43
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
William L. Allen
Author:
Mariña Fernández-Reino
Author:
Isabel Ruiz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics