The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Immigration and the welfare state

Immigration and the welfare state
Immigration and the welfare state
As immigration continues to be politically salient in North America and Europe, questions about the compatibility of modern welfare states with immigration inflows remain central to public and policy debates. This article examines the empirical evidence surrounding three key questions: first, whether generous welfare systems attract immigrants disproportionately (the ‘welfare magnet hypothesis’); second, the extent to which immigrants’ net fiscal contributions are positive, negative, or neutral; and third, how public attitudes toward immigration intersect with concerns about the welfare state. Our analysis indicates that while evidence supporting the welfare magnet hypothesis exists in some contexts, its applicability depends on factors such as migrant characteristics and policy environments. Similarly, fiscal contributions vary: high-skilled immigrants generally contribute positively, while low-skilled migrants and those entering on humanitarian grounds can present short-term fiscal challenges, though these are usually mitigated by integration policies over time. However, while public attitudes and perceptions often diverge from these nuanced realities, they do not entirely correspond with perceptions of existing welfare systems as magnets for migrants or of migrants’ fiscal impacts as being overwhelmingly negative. Instead, public concerns about immigration and welfare often reflect broader socio-economic and cultural anxieties that can shape politics and policy-making despite not aligning with best-available evidence. Therefore, researchers should prioritize finding ways of bridging gaps between empirical findings and public perceptions to inform effective and balanced policies. This could be achieved, in part, by fostering more informed public discussion that acknowledges underlying anxieties, as well as implementing policies that reconcile economic sustainability with social cohesion.
fiscal impacts, immigration, immigration policy, public opinion, redistribution, welfare state
0266-903X
64-86
Allen, William L.
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Fernández-Reino, Mariña
10e4cff8-f646-4136-a935-aded6666bf4b
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826
Allen, William L.
f0d4731a-81c1-4886-b11c-74dfa412bb97
Fernández-Reino, Mariña
10e4cff8-f646-4136-a935-aded6666bf4b
Ruiz, Isabel
81848ab1-24af-4be0-b37e-7f70e6141826

Allen, William L., Fernández-Reino, Mariña and Ruiz, Isabel (2025) Immigration and the welfare state. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 41 (1), 64-86. (doi:10.1093/oxrep/graf014).

Record type: Article

Abstract

As immigration continues to be politically salient in North America and Europe, questions about the compatibility of modern welfare states with immigration inflows remain central to public and policy debates. This article examines the empirical evidence surrounding three key questions: first, whether generous welfare systems attract immigrants disproportionately (the ‘welfare magnet hypothesis’); second, the extent to which immigrants’ net fiscal contributions are positive, negative, or neutral; and third, how public attitudes toward immigration intersect with concerns about the welfare state. Our analysis indicates that while evidence supporting the welfare magnet hypothesis exists in some contexts, its applicability depends on factors such as migrant characteristics and policy environments. Similarly, fiscal contributions vary: high-skilled immigrants generally contribute positively, while low-skilled migrants and those entering on humanitarian grounds can present short-term fiscal challenges, though these are usually mitigated by integration policies over time. However, while public attitudes and perceptions often diverge from these nuanced realities, they do not entirely correspond with perceptions of existing welfare systems as magnets for migrants or of migrants’ fiscal impacts as being overwhelmingly negative. Instead, public concerns about immigration and welfare often reflect broader socio-economic and cultural anxieties that can shape politics and policy-making despite not aligning with best-available evidence. Therefore, researchers should prioritize finding ways of bridging gaps between empirical findings and public perceptions to inform effective and balanced policies. This could be achieved, in part, by fostering more informed public discussion that acknowledges underlying anxieties, as well as implementing policies that reconcile economic sustainability with social cohesion.

Text
graf014 - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 6 June 2025
Keywords: fiscal impacts, immigration, immigration policy, public opinion, redistribution, welfare state

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503134
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503134
ISSN: 0266-903X
PURE UUID: c8b431b5-81a2-4c2a-a05b-909a2e68229c
ORCID for William L. Allen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-1468

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jul 2025 16:44
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:43

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: William L. Allen ORCID iD
Author: Mariña Fernández-Reino
Author: Isabel Ruiz

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×