The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review

Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review
Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review

Introduction Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients may not show improvement after a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Current treatment options include either a second course of IVIg or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the use of a second course of IVIg or TPE in patients who fail to show clinical improvement after the first IVIg course. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline databases up until 26 October 2023. Studies that evaluated adult patients with confirmed GBS who have failed one full course of IVIg and subsequently received either repeat IVIg or TPE were included. Risk of bias was performed using study-specific checklists. A narrative synthesis of results is presented. Results A total of 37 articles were identified (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 3 observational and 33 case reports/series), consisting of 422 patients in total. 12 studies evaluated repeat IVIg and 24 studies evaluated TPE after IVIg. There was no superiority of a repeat course of IVIg or TPE in all clinical outcome measures. Conclusions The evidence suggests with a low degree of certainty that there is no beneficial effect of further IVIg in unresponsive GBS. The quality of evidence regarding TPE after IVIg is insufficient to suggest any efficacy due to a lack of RCTs. We recommend standardised case reporting with consideration for a multinational case registry and RCTs to determine the efficacy of TPE after initial IVIg unresponsiveness.

GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME, INTENSIVE CARE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHOLOGY
Roe, Thomas
cc2b4fda-b121-44a0-a4c0-32c3df49ffd3
Gordon, Alex
0f42dbea-651e-4567-81a3-38d83cf0fb50
Gourd, Nicholas
b619c0e1-1637-41a4-a430-7365ab9f4291
Thomas, Charlotte
d3b8ce2e-52a2-4f4c-8d47-6b3150e07d69
Ward, James
48c65987-4343-4b19-9464-5f1844660fc4
Osman, Chinar
71e768f1-df16-437f-9a2d-980b779d9c73
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
013692a2-cf26-4278-80bd-9d8fcdb17751
Roe, Thomas
cc2b4fda-b121-44a0-a4c0-32c3df49ffd3
Gordon, Alex
0f42dbea-651e-4567-81a3-38d83cf0fb50
Gourd, Nicholas
b619c0e1-1637-41a4-a430-7365ab9f4291
Thomas, Charlotte
d3b8ce2e-52a2-4f4c-8d47-6b3150e07d69
Ward, James
48c65987-4343-4b19-9464-5f1844660fc4
Osman, Chinar
71e768f1-df16-437f-9a2d-980b779d9c73
Dushianthan, Ahilanandan
013692a2-cf26-4278-80bd-9d8fcdb17751

Roe, Thomas, Gordon, Alex, Gourd, Nicholas, Thomas, Charlotte, Ward, James, Osman, Chinar and Dushianthan, Ahilanandan (2025) Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review. BMJ Neurology Open, 7 (1), [e000907]. (doi:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000907).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Introduction Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients may not show improvement after a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Current treatment options include either a second course of IVIg or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the use of a second course of IVIg or TPE in patients who fail to show clinical improvement after the first IVIg course. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline databases up until 26 October 2023. Studies that evaluated adult patients with confirmed GBS who have failed one full course of IVIg and subsequently received either repeat IVIg or TPE were included. Risk of bias was performed using study-specific checklists. A narrative synthesis of results is presented. Results A total of 37 articles were identified (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 3 observational and 33 case reports/series), consisting of 422 patients in total. 12 studies evaluated repeat IVIg and 24 studies evaluated TPE after IVIg. There was no superiority of a repeat course of IVIg or TPE in all clinical outcome measures. Conclusions The evidence suggests with a low degree of certainty that there is no beneficial effect of further IVIg in unresponsive GBS. The quality of evidence regarding TPE after IVIg is insufficient to suggest any efficacy due to a lack of RCTs. We recommend standardised case reporting with consideration for a multinational case registry and RCTs to determine the efficacy of TPE after initial IVIg unresponsiveness.

Text
e000907.full - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (607kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 14 December 2024
Published date: 12 February 2025
Additional Information: Copyright © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Keywords: GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME, INTENSIVE CARE, PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHOLOGY

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503136
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503136
PURE UUID: 90f5dcc7-7349-4a60-8c15-fa7acf6817aa
ORCID for Ahilanandan Dushianthan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-3359

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jul 2025 16:44
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:24

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Thomas Roe
Author: Alex Gordon
Author: Nicholas Gourd
Author: Charlotte Thomas
Author: James Ward
Author: Chinar Osman
Author: Ahilanandan Dushianthan ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×