The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Non-linear cyclic performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete materials and components

Non-linear cyclic performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete materials and components
Non-linear cyclic performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete materials and components
The deterioration of reinforced concrete structures is primarily caused by the corrosion of reinforcing bar (rebar) initiated by chloride ingress from de-icing salts or seawater exposure in coastal environments. This degradation compromises the structural performance, shortens service life and results in substantial economic costs. Stainless steel rebars present a promising alternative to conventional carbon steel rebars due to their superior corrosion resistance, enhancing durability and resilience of reinforced concrete structures.

Current design standards for concrete structures reinforced with stainless steel rebar are largely adapted from those developed for carbon steel rebars and do not specifically account for the distinct mechanical behaviour of stainless steel rebars. Stainless steels exhibit a nonlinear stress-strain response with high ultimate-to-yield strength ratios and superior ductility, which influence the composite behaviour and failure modes of stainless steel reinforced concrete structures. Considering the lack of experimental data and validated constitutive models capable of accurately simulating stainless steel rebars under various loading conditions, this thesis investigated the response of stainless steel rebars and reinforced concrete components subjected to static, cyclic and fatigue loading.

An extensive experimental programme was conducted to characterise the mechanical behaviour of stainless steel rebars under monotonic, cyclic and fatigue loading. A total of 10 tensile, 49 compressive, 25 cyclic and 125 low-cycle high-amplitude fatigue tests were performed. Three stainless steel rebar types were investigated: 12 mm diameter cold-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301, 12 mm diameter hot-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301 and 16 mm diameter hot-rolled lean-duplex EN 1.4482. B500C carbon steel rebars of the same diameters were also tested for comparison. The results demonstrated that stainless steel rebars exhibit superior strain hardening, more gradual post-peak softening and greater energy dissipation under cyclic loading. Fatigue tests revealed enhanced fatigue performance in hot-rolled stainless steel rebars, particularly at lower slenderness ratios, while cold-rolled stainless steel exhibited reduced fatigue life. Strain-life models were calibrated to predict the fatigue life. Uniaxial material models for use in a distributed plasticity approach via fibre sections, adopted in modelling software such as OpenSees, were developed for stainless steel rebars and calibrated using experimental results for application in reinforced concrete structural models.

At component level, the tension stiffening behaviour of stainless steel rebars was investigated, where it was shown that the response of stainless steel rebars differ from that of carbon steel rebars due to the differences in the material stress-strain responses. The codified tension stiffening models, including the crack width and crack spacing provisions, were assessed in detail and implications of the results were discussed. An improved modified tension stiffening model for stainless steel rebars is presented, incorporating the Ramberg–Osgood stress–strain relationship. Large-scale lateral cyclic tests on concrete columns reinforced with stainless steel and carbon steel rebars were carried out. The results demonstrated that stainless steel reinforced concrete columns had improved lateral load resistance, energy dissipation and drift capacity. In addition, numerical models of reinforced concrete columns were developed in OpenSees and validated against the experimentally measured load-drift responses, providing a validated modelling approach for simulation of these components.

The findings of this research highlight the need for revised design provisions that reflect the material properties of stainless steel rebars. The experimental and numerical results in this study provide a foundation for optimising stainless steel reinforced concrete design, contributing to more durable and resilient structures.
University of Southampton
Moodley, Hamish Thomas Mcneil
bb41e7c0-232b-49be-8d8f-a77d0890e2e3
Moodley, Hamish Thomas Mcneil
bb41e7c0-232b-49be-8d8f-a77d0890e2e3
Afshan, Sheida
68dcdcac-c2aa-4c09-951c-da4992e72086
Preston, John
ef81c42e-c896-4768-92d1-052662037f0b
Blainey, Simon
ee6198e5-1f89-4f9b-be8e-52cc10e8b3bb

Moodley, Hamish Thomas Mcneil (2025) Non-linear cyclic performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete materials and components. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 323pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

The deterioration of reinforced concrete structures is primarily caused by the corrosion of reinforcing bar (rebar) initiated by chloride ingress from de-icing salts or seawater exposure in coastal environments. This degradation compromises the structural performance, shortens service life and results in substantial economic costs. Stainless steel rebars present a promising alternative to conventional carbon steel rebars due to their superior corrosion resistance, enhancing durability and resilience of reinforced concrete structures.

Current design standards for concrete structures reinforced with stainless steel rebar are largely adapted from those developed for carbon steel rebars and do not specifically account for the distinct mechanical behaviour of stainless steel rebars. Stainless steels exhibit a nonlinear stress-strain response with high ultimate-to-yield strength ratios and superior ductility, which influence the composite behaviour and failure modes of stainless steel reinforced concrete structures. Considering the lack of experimental data and validated constitutive models capable of accurately simulating stainless steel rebars under various loading conditions, this thesis investigated the response of stainless steel rebars and reinforced concrete components subjected to static, cyclic and fatigue loading.

An extensive experimental programme was conducted to characterise the mechanical behaviour of stainless steel rebars under monotonic, cyclic and fatigue loading. A total of 10 tensile, 49 compressive, 25 cyclic and 125 low-cycle high-amplitude fatigue tests were performed. Three stainless steel rebar types were investigated: 12 mm diameter cold-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301, 12 mm diameter hot-rolled austenitic EN 1.4301 and 16 mm diameter hot-rolled lean-duplex EN 1.4482. B500C carbon steel rebars of the same diameters were also tested for comparison. The results demonstrated that stainless steel rebars exhibit superior strain hardening, more gradual post-peak softening and greater energy dissipation under cyclic loading. Fatigue tests revealed enhanced fatigue performance in hot-rolled stainless steel rebars, particularly at lower slenderness ratios, while cold-rolled stainless steel exhibited reduced fatigue life. Strain-life models were calibrated to predict the fatigue life. Uniaxial material models for use in a distributed plasticity approach via fibre sections, adopted in modelling software such as OpenSees, were developed for stainless steel rebars and calibrated using experimental results for application in reinforced concrete structural models.

At component level, the tension stiffening behaviour of stainless steel rebars was investigated, where it was shown that the response of stainless steel rebars differ from that of carbon steel rebars due to the differences in the material stress-strain responses. The codified tension stiffening models, including the crack width and crack spacing provisions, were assessed in detail and implications of the results were discussed. An improved modified tension stiffening model for stainless steel rebars is presented, incorporating the Ramberg–Osgood stress–strain relationship. Large-scale lateral cyclic tests on concrete columns reinforced with stainless steel and carbon steel rebars were carried out. The results demonstrated that stainless steel reinforced concrete columns had improved lateral load resistance, energy dissipation and drift capacity. In addition, numerical models of reinforced concrete columns were developed in OpenSees and validated against the experimentally measured load-drift responses, providing a validated modelling approach for simulation of these components.

The findings of this research highlight the need for revised design provisions that reflect the material properties of stainless steel rebars. The experimental and numerical results in this study provide a foundation for optimising stainless steel reinforced concrete design, contributing to more durable and resilient structures.

Text
HM_thesis_final (1) - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (110MB)
Text
Final-thesis-submission-Examination-Mr-Hamish-Moodley
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: July 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503282
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503282
PURE UUID: 62b5897f-33a8-4e0b-8d28-a4578b3cc553
ORCID for Sheida Afshan: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-2931
ORCID for John Preston: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6866-049X
ORCID for Simon Blainey: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4249-8110

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Jul 2025 16:39
Last modified: 26 Sep 2025 02:03

Export record

Contributors

Thesis advisor: Sheida Afshan ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: John Preston ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Simon Blainey ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×