The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Lady Justice: the impact of female judges on jury trial verdicts in North Carolina

Lady Justice: the impact of female judges on jury trial verdicts in North Carolina
Lady Justice: the impact of female judges on jury trial verdicts in North Carolina
This study evaluates the impact of judges’ gender on jury trial outcomes in the U.S. state of North Carolina. The identification strategy is based on conditional random assignment of judges to cases. Specifically, I take advantage of the compulsory judges’ rotation imposed by the North Carolina Constitution. The results indicate that the presence of a female judge increases of 9.64–13.50 percentage points the probability of having at least one guilty verdict from the jury and of 9.5%–13.45% increase in the proportion of guilty verdicts expressed by the jury. Additionally, I perform a series of robustness and heterogeneity checks. I also investigate the potential mechanisms driving the results, exploring the influence of the jury selection process and women’s attitudes toward the courts and sentencing.
Gender, Judge, Trials behaviours
1873-5703
Foresta, Alessandra
aaf8f667-e9bb-410d-bedc-da9bd6fff3bc
Foresta, Alessandra
aaf8f667-e9bb-410d-bedc-da9bd6fff3bc

Foresta, Alessandra (2025) Lady Justice: the impact of female judges on jury trial verdicts in North Carolina. European Journal of Political Economy, 88, [102678]. (doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102678).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of judges’ gender on jury trial outcomes in the U.S. state of North Carolina. The identification strategy is based on conditional random assignment of judges to cases. Specifically, I take advantage of the compulsory judges’ rotation imposed by the North Carolina Constitution. The results indicate that the presence of a female judge increases of 9.64–13.50 percentage points the probability of having at least one guilty verdict from the jury and of 9.5%–13.45% increase in the proportion of guilty verdicts expressed by the jury. Additionally, I perform a series of robustness and heterogeneity checks. I also investigate the potential mechanisms driving the results, exploring the influence of the jury selection process and women’s attitudes toward the courts and sentencing.

Text
1-s2.0-S0176268025000382-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 15 April 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 May 2025
Published date: 3 June 2025
Keywords: Gender, Judge, Trials behaviours

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503338
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503338
ISSN: 1873-5703
PURE UUID: 5a5a9292-358b-42df-a4fe-7915b31f384d
ORCID for Alessandra Foresta: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-2791

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2025 16:47
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alessandra Foresta ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×