Why decentralize decision making? English local actors' viewpoints
Why decentralize decision making? English local actors' viewpoints
Decentralized decision making has created restructuring from larger to smaller administrative units, but in many places, strays little from existing arrangements. Moves toward decentralization from central government to city-regions, and in some areas, below city-region scale to neighborhoods, reflect a mandate for reform. What is the nature and extent of desired reforms? Using an institutionalist lens, homogeneity and heterogeneity in local narratives about possible future reform can be surfaced. This article emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of local actors' narratives in shaping decentralized institutions. This article uses the findings from a Q-methodology study to identify and interrogate distinctive local viewpoints on attempts to decentralize decision making in England. In a systematic empirical analysis, local actors' narratives were largely in favor of relatively minor modifications to the status quo. The findings question a conflation of decentralization with participation in decision making.
159-176
Richardson, Liz
c4e98c2a-9051-43f3-be61-542e4df98dc1
Durose, Catherine
9773692b-b486-404a-8c68-53652a252e31
Dean, Rikki J.
a830dbdb-7c38-41d3-9d18-02c335d645cb
Richardson, Liz
c4e98c2a-9051-43f3-be61-542e4df98dc1
Durose, Catherine
9773692b-b486-404a-8c68-53652a252e31
Dean, Rikki J.
a830dbdb-7c38-41d3-9d18-02c335d645cb
Richardson, Liz, Durose, Catherine and Dean, Rikki J.
(2018)
Why decentralize decision making? English local actors' viewpoints.
Governance, 32 (1), .
(doi:10.1111/gove.12365).
Abstract
Decentralized decision making has created restructuring from larger to smaller administrative units, but in many places, strays little from existing arrangements. Moves toward decentralization from central government to city-regions, and in some areas, below city-region scale to neighborhoods, reflect a mandate for reform. What is the nature and extent of desired reforms? Using an institutionalist lens, homogeneity and heterogeneity in local narratives about possible future reform can be surfaced. This article emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of local actors' narratives in shaping decentralized institutions. This article uses the findings from a Q-methodology study to identify and interrogate distinctive local viewpoints on attempts to decentralize decision making in England. In a systematic empirical analysis, local actors' narratives were largely in favor of relatively minor modifications to the status quo. The findings question a conflation of decentralization with participation in decision making.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 2 October 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503511
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503511
ISSN: 0952-1895
PURE UUID: 587e67ae-dc49-4625-9f25-ae4a7d8e86fd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Aug 2025 16:48
Last modified: 05 Aug 2025 02:11
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Liz Richardson
Author:
Catherine Durose
Author:
Rikki J. Dean
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics