The asymmetric influence of event-based news on cryptocurrency volatility: a survival analysis study of jump and co-jump behaviour in cryptocurrency markets
The asymmetric influence of event-based news on cryptocurrency volatility: a survival analysis study of jump and co-jump behaviour in cryptocurrency markets
This paper examines how cryptocurrency-specific news sentiment influences the timing and occurrence of volatility jumps in cryptocurrency returns, offering a behavioural framework that distinguishes between polarity-driven and state-contingent effects. Using ten years of hourly Event Sentiment Scores (ESS) from RavenPack, we analyse a panel of 87 cryptocurrencies and detect idiosyncratic and systemic jumps in volatility returns using the Bipower Variation method. These discontinuities are modelled using Cox Proportional Hazards estimation to assess how sentiment affects the hazard rate of both jump types.
Our results uncover a clear polarity-based asymmetry under calm conditions: mildly positive and negative sentiment both accelerate jump risk, but optimism exerts a stronger effect—consistent with behavioural theories of speculative momentum. However, this asymmetry disappears under systemic stress. During co-jump periods, sentiment effects are symmetrically amplified, suggesting that market synchronisation lowers behavioural thresholds and increases the volatility hazard irrespective of sentiment direction. At the systemic level, both positive and negative sentiment significantly raise the hazard of co-jumps, but without statistically significant asymmetry in polarity.
These findings introduce the concept of contagion asymmetry, where the amplification of sentiment-induced risk is not driven by emotional valence but by the system’s vulnerability to synchronised behaviour. Robustness checks across thresholds, coin tiers, time periods, and systemic conditions confirm that the strength and shape of sentiment effects are highly conditional. Methodologically, our use of survival analysis allows for more precise behavioural interpretation by capturing not only whether sentiment matters, but when. This study extends the sentiment-volatility literature by reframing co-jumps as state-contingent contagion events and highlights the importance of timing in modelling crypto-market instability.
Tembo, Thokozile Mirriam
9eaeb1bd-bf0c-4945-a254-49840a284e56
Ma, Tiejun
1f591849-f17c-4209-9f42-e6587b499bae
McGroarty, Frank
693a5396-8e01-4d68-8973-d74184c03072
He, He
73b8c9fb-95c7-4aa9-911f-188b0b0f6032
31 July 2025
Tembo, Thokozile Mirriam
9eaeb1bd-bf0c-4945-a254-49840a284e56
Ma, Tiejun
1f591849-f17c-4209-9f42-e6587b499bae
McGroarty, Frank
693a5396-8e01-4d68-8973-d74184c03072
He, He
73b8c9fb-95c7-4aa9-911f-188b0b0f6032
Tembo, Thokozile Mirriam, Ma, Tiejun, McGroarty, Frank and He, He
(2025)
The asymmetric influence of event-based news on cryptocurrency volatility: a survival analysis study of jump and co-jump behaviour in cryptocurrency markets.
World Finance Conference, University of Malta, Valetta, Malta.
28 - 31 Jul 2025.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
This paper examines how cryptocurrency-specific news sentiment influences the timing and occurrence of volatility jumps in cryptocurrency returns, offering a behavioural framework that distinguishes between polarity-driven and state-contingent effects. Using ten years of hourly Event Sentiment Scores (ESS) from RavenPack, we analyse a panel of 87 cryptocurrencies and detect idiosyncratic and systemic jumps in volatility returns using the Bipower Variation method. These discontinuities are modelled using Cox Proportional Hazards estimation to assess how sentiment affects the hazard rate of both jump types.
Our results uncover a clear polarity-based asymmetry under calm conditions: mildly positive and negative sentiment both accelerate jump risk, but optimism exerts a stronger effect—consistent with behavioural theories of speculative momentum. However, this asymmetry disappears under systemic stress. During co-jump periods, sentiment effects are symmetrically amplified, suggesting that market synchronisation lowers behavioural thresholds and increases the volatility hazard irrespective of sentiment direction. At the systemic level, both positive and negative sentiment significantly raise the hazard of co-jumps, but without statistically significant asymmetry in polarity.
These findings introduce the concept of contagion asymmetry, where the amplification of sentiment-induced risk is not driven by emotional valence but by the system’s vulnerability to synchronised behaviour. Robustness checks across thresholds, coin tiers, time periods, and systemic conditions confirm that the strength and shape of sentiment effects are highly conditional. Methodologically, our use of survival analysis allows for more precise behavioural interpretation by capturing not only whether sentiment matters, but when. This study extends the sentiment-volatility literature by reframing co-jumps as state-contingent contagion events and highlights the importance of timing in modelling crypto-market instability.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 31 July 2025
Venue - Dates:
World Finance Conference, University of Malta, Valetta, Malta, 2025-07-28 - 2025-07-31
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503521
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503521
PURE UUID: df207952-a875-48af-a411-3c1e0d624858
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Aug 2025 16:53
Last modified: 05 Aug 2025 02:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Thokozile Mirriam Tembo
Author:
Frank McGroarty
Author:
He He
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics