The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The fishery for Antarctic krill – conflicts between industrial production, protection of biodiversity, and legal governance

The fishery for Antarctic krill – conflicts between industrial production, protection of biodiversity, and legal governance
The fishery for Antarctic krill – conflicts between industrial production, protection of biodiversity, and legal governance

The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) is responsible for conserving the Antarctic marine ecosystem, where conservation also includes the management of commercial fisheries. The largest fishery (by weight) in Antarctic waters is that for Antarctic krill, a species vital to biogeochemical cycles and carbon sequestration, and a critical dietary item for a broad guild of marine predators. Fishing interests grew from the 1960s onwards, but catches then declined following the breakup of the Soviet Union. Now catches are again increasing, CCAMLR has been developing a revised krill fishery management framework intended to reduce ecosystem risks to predators at critical times of year. At the CCAMLR meeting in 2024, ongoing development of the revised framework was considered, however no progress was made. Progress is urgent, since part of the existing management approach was not renewed. Consequently, by default, catches in the southwest Atlantic may now aggregate in space and time; the interim catch limit for krill (620,000 t) can now be taken from anywhere and at any time, including at times and in places critical to krill predators, possibly with unintended consequences. Allowing catches to aggregate in space and time is something CCAMLR has long sought to avoid. Existing voluntary measures implemented by the fishery will help distribute catches, but are no substitute for de jure management. In addition to risks to the ecosystem, the current situation also presents risks for fishing nations and for CCAMLR itself. Rapid progress with the revised management framework now depends upon rebuilding consensus.

CCAMLR, Conflicted views, Krill fishery, Precautionary management
0308-597X
Trathan, Philip
9a10e222-1041-446b-b796-0b65a815b69d
Friedlaender, Ari
bceec0b0-26aa-45be-91b9-a9e9c278494b
Johnson, Chris
943218a6-94b6-4e7c-bb44-158e76540b69
Reisinger, Ryan
4eaf9440-48e5-41fa-853f-d46457e5444e
Trathan, Philip
9a10e222-1041-446b-b796-0b65a815b69d
Friedlaender, Ari
bceec0b0-26aa-45be-91b9-a9e9c278494b
Johnson, Chris
943218a6-94b6-4e7c-bb44-158e76540b69
Reisinger, Ryan
4eaf9440-48e5-41fa-853f-d46457e5444e

Trathan, Philip, Friedlaender, Ari, Johnson, Chris and Reisinger, Ryan (2025) The fishery for Antarctic krill – conflicts between industrial production, protection of biodiversity, and legal governance. Marine Policy, 180, [106787]. (doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106787).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) is responsible for conserving the Antarctic marine ecosystem, where conservation also includes the management of commercial fisheries. The largest fishery (by weight) in Antarctic waters is that for Antarctic krill, a species vital to biogeochemical cycles and carbon sequestration, and a critical dietary item for a broad guild of marine predators. Fishing interests grew from the 1960s onwards, but catches then declined following the breakup of the Soviet Union. Now catches are again increasing, CCAMLR has been developing a revised krill fishery management framework intended to reduce ecosystem risks to predators at critical times of year. At the CCAMLR meeting in 2024, ongoing development of the revised framework was considered, however no progress was made. Progress is urgent, since part of the existing management approach was not renewed. Consequently, by default, catches in the southwest Atlantic may now aggregate in space and time; the interim catch limit for krill (620,000 t) can now be taken from anywhere and at any time, including at times and in places critical to krill predators, possibly with unintended consequences. Allowing catches to aggregate in space and time is something CCAMLR has long sought to avoid. Existing voluntary measures implemented by the fishery will help distribute catches, but are no substitute for de jure management. In addition to risks to the ecosystem, the current situation also presents risks for fishing nations and for CCAMLR itself. Rapid progress with the revised management framework now depends upon rebuilding consensus.

Text
1-s2.0-S0308597X25002027-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 29 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 June 2025
Published date: 3 June 2025
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2025
Keywords: CCAMLR, Conflicted views, Krill fishery, Precautionary management

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503547
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503547
ISSN: 0308-597X
PURE UUID: 07a07e9a-cefe-4c05-af38-b15293b4f565
ORCID for Ryan Reisinger: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-6875

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2025 16:36
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Philip Trathan
Author: Ari Friedlaender
Author: Chris Johnson
Author: Ryan Reisinger ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×