The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models

Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models
Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models

This paper extends standard AR and HAR models for realised volatility (RV) forecasting to include nonlinearity through two broad regime-switching approaches, the smooth transition and Markov-switching methods. Using daily data for eight international stock markets over the period 2007–2021, a comprehensive comparison is provided using a range of forecast tests that includes statistical and economic (risk management) based metrics. The results show that regime-switching models provide a better in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting, although this latter result is less clear-cut at the daily horizon. In comparing the two nonlinear approaches, we find that the abrupt transition technique of the Markov-switching model is preferred to the smooth transition one. It is believed that our results will be of interest to those especially engaged in risk management practice as well as for those modelling market behaviour.

Expected shortfall, Non-linearity, Realised volatility, Regime switching, Value at risk
1059-0560
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David G.
a4948f53-2cec-4a06-9475-3c295dd0375a
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David G.
a4948f53-2cec-4a06-9475-3c295dd0375a

Ding, Yi, Kambouroudis, Dimos and McMillan, David G. (2025) Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models. International Review of Economics and Finance, 101, [104171]. (doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104171).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper extends standard AR and HAR models for realised volatility (RV) forecasting to include nonlinearity through two broad regime-switching approaches, the smooth transition and Markov-switching methods. Using daily data for eight international stock markets over the period 2007–2021, a comprehensive comparison is provided using a range of forecast tests that includes statistical and economic (risk management) based metrics. The results show that regime-switching models provide a better in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting, although this latter result is less clear-cut at the daily horizon. In comparing the two nonlinear approaches, we find that the abrupt transition technique of the Markov-switching model is preferred to the smooth transition one. It is believed that our results will be of interest to those especially engaged in risk management practice as well as for those modelling market behaviour.

Text
1-s2.0-S105905602500334X-main - Version of Record
Download (5MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 May 2025
Published date: 16 May 2025
Keywords: Expected shortfall, Non-linearity, Realised volatility, Regime switching, Value at risk

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503587
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503587
ISSN: 1059-0560
PURE UUID: a7d38955-dfbe-4041-89da-22be025434fb
ORCID for Yi Ding: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-3201

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2025 16:58
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:35

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Yi Ding ORCID iD
Author: Dimos Kambouroudis
Author: David G. McMillan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×