Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models
Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models
This paper extends standard AR and HAR models for realised volatility (RV) forecasting to include nonlinearity through two broad regime-switching approaches, the smooth transition and Markov-switching methods. Using daily data for eight international stock markets over the period 2007–2021, a comprehensive comparison is provided using a range of forecast tests that includes statistical and economic (risk management) based metrics. The results show that regime-switching models provide a better in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting, although this latter result is less clear-cut at the daily horizon. In comparing the two nonlinear approaches, we find that the abrupt transition technique of the Markov-switching model is preferred to the smooth transition one. It is believed that our results will be of interest to those especially engaged in risk management practice as well as for those modelling market behaviour.
Expected shortfall, Non-linearity, Realised volatility, Regime switching, Value at risk
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David G.
a4948f53-2cec-4a06-9475-3c295dd0375a
16 May 2025
Ding, Yi
c2398405-127c-4dfc-a0d8-e4025d736610
Kambouroudis, Dimos
a1263623-1c79-48a4-b837-893bd31e6275
McMillan, David G.
a4948f53-2cec-4a06-9475-3c295dd0375a
Ding, Yi, Kambouroudis, Dimos and McMillan, David G.
(2025)
Forecasting realised volatility using regime-switching models.
International Review of Economics and Finance, 101, [104171].
(doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104171).
Abstract
This paper extends standard AR and HAR models for realised volatility (RV) forecasting to include nonlinearity through two broad regime-switching approaches, the smooth transition and Markov-switching methods. Using daily data for eight international stock markets over the period 2007–2021, a comprehensive comparison is provided using a range of forecast tests that includes statistical and economic (risk management) based metrics. The results show that regime-switching models provide a better in-sample fit and out-of-sample forecasting, although this latter result is less clear-cut at the daily horizon. In comparing the two nonlinear approaches, we find that the abrupt transition technique of the Markov-switching model is preferred to the smooth transition one. It is believed that our results will be of interest to those especially engaged in risk management practice as well as for those modelling market behaviour.
Text
1-s2.0-S105905602500334X-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 11 May 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 13 May 2025
Published date: 16 May 2025
Keywords:
Expected shortfall, Non-linearity, Realised volatility, Regime switching, Value at risk
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503587
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503587
ISSN: 1059-0560
PURE UUID: a7d38955-dfbe-4041-89da-22be025434fb
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Aug 2025 16:58
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Yi Ding
Author:
Dimos Kambouroudis
Author:
David G. McMillan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics