The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery

Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery
Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery

INTRODUCTION: Surgical procedures incorporating a cosmetic element such as septorhinoplasty and otoplasty are currently under threat in the National Health Service (NHS) as they are deemed to be procedures of 'limited clinical benefit' by many primary care providers. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), which assess the quality of care delivered from the patients' perspective, are becoming increasingly important in documenting the effectiveness of such procedures.

METHODS: The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, a validated PROM tool, was used to assess patient satisfaction in 141 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery over a 90-month period at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust.

RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients with a mean follow-up period of 36 months completed the study. The mean ROE score was 73.3%. In addition, 75% of patients questioned were happy with the final result of their operation and 83% would undergo the procedure again if required. These benefits occurred irrespective of age, sex and primary versus revision surgery, and were maintained for up to 71 months following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients are generally satisfied with their functional and cosmetic outcomes following septorhinoplasty surgery. These results help support the case for septorhinoplasty surgery to continue being funded as an NHS procedure.

Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data, Rhinoplasty, Self Concept, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom/epidemiology, Young Adult
0035-8843
63-5
Biggs, T C
887596b4-f2ad-4067-8f01-5f2cfe1ae394
Fraser, L R
4f65f0ff-2575-4ab3-accf-585723cc8f15
Ward, M J
6fa09ce7-bfcf-4c99-99cb-85188de27526
Sunkaraneni, V S
ad07934e-5265-45d7-ac9f-b3a5a0b08e10
Harries, P G
df33be64-b580-4fdf-ac4d-4c842b55d753
Salib, R J
d6fde1c1-5b5e-43f7-ae1c-42cce6a0c9fc
Biggs, T C
887596b4-f2ad-4067-8f01-5f2cfe1ae394
Fraser, L R
4f65f0ff-2575-4ab3-accf-585723cc8f15
Ward, M J
6fa09ce7-bfcf-4c99-99cb-85188de27526
Sunkaraneni, V S
ad07934e-5265-45d7-ac9f-b3a5a0b08e10
Harries, P G
df33be64-b580-4fdf-ac4d-4c842b55d753
Salib, R J
d6fde1c1-5b5e-43f7-ae1c-42cce6a0c9fc

Biggs, T C, Fraser, L R, Ward, M J, Sunkaraneni, V S, Harries, P G and Salib, R J (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97 (1), 63-5. (doi:10.1308/003588414X14055925059075).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgical procedures incorporating a cosmetic element such as septorhinoplasty and otoplasty are currently under threat in the National Health Service (NHS) as they are deemed to be procedures of 'limited clinical benefit' by many primary care providers. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), which assess the quality of care delivered from the patients' perspective, are becoming increasingly important in documenting the effectiveness of such procedures.

METHODS: The Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire, a validated PROM tool, was used to assess patient satisfaction in 141 patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery over a 90-month period at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust.

RESULTS: Overall, 100 patients with a mean follow-up period of 36 months completed the study. The mean ROE score was 73.3%. In addition, 75% of patients questioned were happy with the final result of their operation and 83% would undergo the procedure again if required. These benefits occurred irrespective of age, sex and primary versus revision surgery, and were maintained for up to 71 months following surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that patients are generally satisfied with their functional and cosmetic outcomes following septorhinoplasty surgery. These results help support the case for septorhinoplasty surgery to continue being funded as an NHS procedure.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: January 2015
Keywords: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data, Rhinoplasty, Self Concept, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom/epidemiology, Young Adult

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503752
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503752
ISSN: 0035-8843
PURE UUID: e8038c5f-d2ff-4456-a77c-058e5b87e827
ORCID for R J Salib: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6753-7844

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2025 16:59
Last modified: 13 Aug 2025 02:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: T C Biggs
Author: L R Fraser
Author: M J Ward
Author: V S Sunkaraneni
Author: P G Harries
Author: R J Salib ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×