The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion

Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion
Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion
We study auction design for bidders equipped with non-expected utility preferences that exhibit constant risk aversion (CRA). The CRA class is large and includes loss-averse, disappointment-averse, mean-dispersion, and Yaari’s dual preferences as well as coherent and convex risk measures. Any preference in this class displays first-order risk aversion, contrasting the standard expected utility case which displays second-order risk aversion. The optimal mechanism offers “ full-insurance” in the sense that each agent’s utility is independent of other agents’ reports. The seller excludes less types than under risk neutrality and awards the object randomly to intermediate types. Subjecting intermediate types to a risky allocation while compensating them when losing allows the seller to collect larger payments from higher types. Relatively high types are willing to pay more, and their allocation is efficient.
0034-6527
2630-2662
Gershkov, Alex
214a0b5e-c742-486d-b910-c8ec702c943a
Moldovanu, Benny
f84fdd42-3143-4219-be24-fb26385b106d
Strack, Philipp
35074b36-f2b6-439e-bc94-8f469f83d474
Zhang, Mengxi
862887d0-ad62-42e3-bf3d-6b82a872347c
Gershkov, Alex
214a0b5e-c742-486d-b910-c8ec702c943a
Moldovanu, Benny
f84fdd42-3143-4219-be24-fb26385b106d
Strack, Philipp
35074b36-f2b6-439e-bc94-8f469f83d474
Zhang, Mengxi
862887d0-ad62-42e3-bf3d-6b82a872347c

Gershkov, Alex, Moldovanu, Benny, Strack, Philipp and Zhang, Mengxi (2021) Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion. The Review of Economic Studies, 89 (5), 2630-2662. (doi:10.1093/restud/rdab096).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We study auction design for bidders equipped with non-expected utility preferences that exhibit constant risk aversion (CRA). The CRA class is large and includes loss-averse, disappointment-averse, mean-dispersion, and Yaari’s dual preferences as well as coherent and convex risk measures. Any preference in this class displays first-order risk aversion, contrasting the standard expected utility case which displays second-order risk aversion. The optimal mechanism offers “ full-insurance” in the sense that each agent’s utility is independent of other agents’ reports. The seller excludes less types than under risk neutrality and awards the object randomly to intermediate types. Subjecting intermediate types to a risky allocation while compensating them when losing allows the seller to collect larger payments from higher types. Relatively high types are willing to pay more, and their allocation is efficient.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 27 December 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503777
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503777
ISSN: 0034-6527
PURE UUID: 1e60069f-2eda-4663-8593-09a0d6c36936
ORCID for Alex Gershkov: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-8428

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2025 17:14
Last modified: 13 Aug 2025 03:04

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alex Gershkov ORCID iD
Author: Benny Moldovanu
Author: Philipp Strack
Author: Mengxi Zhang

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×