Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion
Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion
We study auction design for bidders equipped with non-expected utility preferences that exhibit constant risk aversion (CRA). The CRA class is large and includes loss-averse, disappointment-averse, mean-dispersion, and Yaari’s dual preferences as well as coherent and convex risk measures. Any preference in this class displays first-order risk aversion, contrasting the standard expected utility case which displays second-order risk aversion. The optimal mechanism offers “ full-insurance” in the sense that each agent’s utility is independent of other agents’ reports. The seller excludes less types than under risk neutrality and awards the object randomly to intermediate types. Subjecting intermediate types to a risky allocation while compensating them when losing allows the seller to collect larger payments from higher types. Relatively high types are willing to pay more, and their allocation is efficient.
2630-2662
Gershkov, Alex
214a0b5e-c742-486d-b910-c8ec702c943a
Moldovanu, Benny
f84fdd42-3143-4219-be24-fb26385b106d
Strack, Philipp
35074b36-f2b6-439e-bc94-8f469f83d474
Zhang, Mengxi
862887d0-ad62-42e3-bf3d-6b82a872347c
27 December 2021
Gershkov, Alex
214a0b5e-c742-486d-b910-c8ec702c943a
Moldovanu, Benny
f84fdd42-3143-4219-be24-fb26385b106d
Strack, Philipp
35074b36-f2b6-439e-bc94-8f469f83d474
Zhang, Mengxi
862887d0-ad62-42e3-bf3d-6b82a872347c
Gershkov, Alex, Moldovanu, Benny, Strack, Philipp and Zhang, Mengxi
(2021)
Optimal auctions: non-expected utility and constant risk aversion.
The Review of Economic Studies, 89 (5), .
(doi:10.1093/restud/rdab096).
Abstract
We study auction design for bidders equipped with non-expected utility preferences that exhibit constant risk aversion (CRA). The CRA class is large and includes loss-averse, disappointment-averse, mean-dispersion, and Yaari’s dual preferences as well as coherent and convex risk measures. Any preference in this class displays first-order risk aversion, contrasting the standard expected utility case which displays second-order risk aversion. The optimal mechanism offers “ full-insurance” in the sense that each agent’s utility is independent of other agents’ reports. The seller excludes less types than under risk neutrality and awards the object randomly to intermediate types. Subjecting intermediate types to a risky allocation while compensating them when losing allows the seller to collect larger payments from higher types. Relatively high types are willing to pay more, and their allocation is efficient.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 27 December 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503777
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503777
ISSN: 0034-6527
PURE UUID: 1e60069f-2eda-4663-8593-09a0d6c36936
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2025 17:14
Last modified: 13 Aug 2025 03:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alex Gershkov
Author:
Benny Moldovanu
Author:
Philipp Strack
Author:
Mengxi Zhang
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics