The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field

From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field
From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field
In this article, we advocate for a more balanced approach to the study of the past in management and organization studies. We define organizational mnemonics as a broader field of inquiry focused on theorizing the past as an integral part of organizational life, including three major epistemic communities—that is, functionalist, interpretive, and critical. We contend that much of organizational mnemonics research has been dominated by functionalism, at the expense of other approaches. To remediate this situation, we first characterize organizational mnemonics’ core epistemic communities. Second, we look at the boundary work at the interstices of these communities to explore possibilities of dialogue among them. We argue that the future of the study of the past in organizations should acknowledge different perspectives, the intersections among them, and make a conscientious effort to maintain diversity of scholarship in the field.
1350-5076
227-240
Coraiola, Diego M
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Murcia, Maria Jose
0e855730-962a-46ad-b4b2-6b0221e39d07
Coraiola, Diego M
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Murcia, Maria Jose
0e855730-962a-46ad-b4b2-6b0221e39d07

Coraiola, Diego M and Murcia, Maria Jose (2019) From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field. Management Learning, 51 (2), 227-240. (doi:10.1177/1350507619889737).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this article, we advocate for a more balanced approach to the study of the past in management and organization studies. We define organizational mnemonics as a broader field of inquiry focused on theorizing the past as an integral part of organizational life, including three major epistemic communities—that is, functionalist, interpretive, and critical. We contend that much of organizational mnemonics research has been dominated by functionalism, at the expense of other approaches. To remediate this situation, we first characterize organizational mnemonics’ core epistemic communities. Second, we look at the boundary work at the interstices of these communities to explore possibilities of dialogue among them. We argue that the future of the study of the past in organizations should acknowledge different perspectives, the intersections among them, and make a conscientious effort to maintain diversity of scholarship in the field.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 16 December 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503794
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503794
ISSN: 1350-5076
PURE UUID: 38e3c2d3-a071-4c1c-9d0a-0a8e685ee71b
ORCID for Diego M Coraiola: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-627X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Aug 2025 16:39
Last modified: 14 Aug 2025 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Diego M Coraiola ORCID iD
Author: Maria Jose Murcia

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×