From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field
From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field
In this article, we advocate for a more balanced approach to the study of the past in management and organization studies. We define organizational mnemonics as a broader field of inquiry focused on theorizing the past as an integral part of organizational life, including three major epistemic communities—that is, functionalist, interpretive, and critical. We contend that much of organizational mnemonics research has been dominated by functionalism, at the expense of other approaches. To remediate this situation, we first characterize organizational mnemonics’ core epistemic communities. Second, we look at the boundary work at the interstices of these communities to explore possibilities of dialogue among them. We argue that the future of the study of the past in organizations should acknowledge different perspectives, the intersections among them, and make a conscientious effort to maintain diversity of scholarship in the field.
227-240
Coraiola, Diego M
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Murcia, Maria Jose
0e855730-962a-46ad-b4b2-6b0221e39d07
16 December 2019
Coraiola, Diego M
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Murcia, Maria Jose
0e855730-962a-46ad-b4b2-6b0221e39d07
Coraiola, Diego M and Murcia, Maria Jose
(2019)
From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field.
Management Learning, 51 (2), .
(doi:10.1177/1350507619889737).
Abstract
In this article, we advocate for a more balanced approach to the study of the past in management and organization studies. We define organizational mnemonics as a broader field of inquiry focused on theorizing the past as an integral part of organizational life, including three major epistemic communities—that is, functionalist, interpretive, and critical. We contend that much of organizational mnemonics research has been dominated by functionalism, at the expense of other approaches. To remediate this situation, we first characterize organizational mnemonics’ core epistemic communities. Second, we look at the boundary work at the interstices of these communities to explore possibilities of dialogue among them. We argue that the future of the study of the past in organizations should acknowledge different perspectives, the intersections among them, and make a conscientious effort to maintain diversity of scholarship in the field.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 16 December 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503794
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503794
ISSN: 1350-5076
PURE UUID: 38e3c2d3-a071-4c1c-9d0a-0a8e685ee71b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 13 Aug 2025 16:39
Last modified: 14 Aug 2025 02:14
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Diego M Coraiola
Author:
Maria Jose Murcia
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics