The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment

Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment
Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment
Basu and Bundick, 2017 showed an intertemporal preference volatility shock has meaningful effects on real activity in a New Keynesian model with Epstein and Zin, 1991 preferences. We show that when the distributional weights on current and future utility in the Epstein–Zin time aggregator do not sum to 1, there is an asymptote in the responses to such a shock with unit intertemporal elasticity of substitution. In the Basu–Bundick model, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution is set near unity and the preference shock only hits current utility, so the sum of the weights differs from 1. We show that when we restrict the weights to sum to 1, the asymptote disappears and preference volatility shocks no longer have large effects. We examine several different calibrations and preferences as potential resolutions with varying degrees of success.
0012-9682
1513-1526
de Groot, Oliver
0be49c71-aa34-43d6-80b7-89426334ecfc
Richter, Alexander W.
c8758e84-f899-4566-9608-66e44f9a247e
Throckmorton, Nathaniel A.
8e00f0fe-ee04-4165-b82b-51bed7077bfa
de Groot, Oliver
0be49c71-aa34-43d6-80b7-89426334ecfc
Richter, Alexander W.
c8758e84-f899-4566-9608-66e44f9a247e
Throckmorton, Nathaniel A.
8e00f0fe-ee04-4165-b82b-51bed7077bfa

de Groot, Oliver, Richter, Alexander W. and Throckmorton, Nathaniel A. (2018) Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment. Econometrica, 86 (4), 1513-1526, [103375]. (doi:10.3982/ECTA15405).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Basu and Bundick, 2017 showed an intertemporal preference volatility shock has meaningful effects on real activity in a New Keynesian model with Epstein and Zin, 1991 preferences. We show that when the distributional weights on current and future utility in the Epstein–Zin time aggregator do not sum to 1, there is an asymptote in the responses to such a shock with unit intertemporal elasticity of substitution. In the Basu–Bundick model, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution is set near unity and the preference shock only hits current utility, so the sum of the weights differs from 1. We show that when we restrict the weights to sum to 1, the asymptote disappears and preference volatility shocks no longer have large effects. We examine several different calibrations and preferences as potential resolutions with varying degrees of success.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: July 2018

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503877
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503877
ISSN: 0012-9682
PURE UUID: d5750d2d-5658-4df8-8483-a0232b8eaef8
ORCID for Oliver de Groot: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6853-1129

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Aug 2025 16:43
Last modified: 16 Aug 2025 02:17

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Oliver de Groot ORCID iD
Author: Alexander W. Richter
Author: Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×