Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment
Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment
Basu and Bundick, 2017 showed an intertemporal preference volatility shock has meaningful effects on real activity in a New Keynesian model with Epstein and Zin, 1991 preferences. We show that when the distributional weights on current and future utility in the Epstein–Zin time aggregator do not sum to 1, there is an asymptote in the responses to such a shock with unit intertemporal elasticity of substitution. In the Basu–Bundick model, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution is set near unity and the preference shock only hits current utility, so the sum of the weights differs from 1. We show that when we restrict the weights to sum to 1, the asymptote disappears and preference volatility shocks no longer have large effects. We examine several different calibrations and preferences as potential resolutions with varying degrees of success.
1513-1526
de Groot, Oliver
0be49c71-aa34-43d6-80b7-89426334ecfc
Richter, Alexander W.
c8758e84-f899-4566-9608-66e44f9a247e
Throckmorton, Nathaniel A.
8e00f0fe-ee04-4165-b82b-51bed7077bfa
July 2018
de Groot, Oliver
0be49c71-aa34-43d6-80b7-89426334ecfc
Richter, Alexander W.
c8758e84-f899-4566-9608-66e44f9a247e
Throckmorton, Nathaniel A.
8e00f0fe-ee04-4165-b82b-51bed7077bfa
de Groot, Oliver, Richter, Alexander W. and Throckmorton, Nathaniel A.
(2018)
Uncertainty shocks in a model of effective demand: comment.
Econometrica, 86 (4), , [103375].
(doi:10.3982/ECTA15405).
Abstract
Basu and Bundick, 2017 showed an intertemporal preference volatility shock has meaningful effects on real activity in a New Keynesian model with Epstein and Zin, 1991 preferences. We show that when the distributional weights on current and future utility in the Epstein–Zin time aggregator do not sum to 1, there is an asymptote in the responses to such a shock with unit intertemporal elasticity of substitution. In the Basu–Bundick model, the intertemporal elasticity of substitution is set near unity and the preference shock only hits current utility, so the sum of the weights differs from 1. We show that when we restrict the weights to sum to 1, the asymptote disappears and preference volatility shocks no longer have large effects. We examine several different calibrations and preferences as potential resolutions with varying degrees of success.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: July 2018
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 503877
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503877
ISSN: 0012-9682
PURE UUID: d5750d2d-5658-4df8-8483-a0232b8eaef8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Aug 2025 16:43
Last modified: 16 Aug 2025 02:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Oliver de Groot
Author:
Alexander W. Richter
Author:
Nathaniel A. Throckmorton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics