The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Symptom appraisal and help-seeking for complications of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis

Symptom appraisal and help-seeking for complications of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis
Symptom appraisal and help-seeking for complications of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis
Background: complications of cancer and its treatment can be life-threatening, disrupt cancer treatment and negatively impact health-related quality of life. While we understand how people appraise symptoms prior to a cancer diagnosis, little is known about how people decide to seek help for complications during cancer treatment.

Aim: characterise how patients and informal caregivers appraise symptoms suggestive of, and decide whether to seek help from urgent and emergency care (or not) for, complications of cancer and its treatment.

Methods: systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Six electronic databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo and Web of Science) were searched for papers using qualitative methods published since 2000 (last search performed on 11 October 2024). Supplementary and cluster searches were performed. 7120 records were identified and 22 papers (representing accounts of over 300 people with cancer) were included following the application of the ‘appraisal prompts’ criteria. Data were synthesised using abductive analysis.

Findings: a conceptual map was developed to articulate how five analytic constructs interact and influence the ‘patient work’ of detecting, interpreting and responding to complications. Findings show that appraising symptoms is iterative and informed by knowledge, skills and perceptions developed prior to treatment through experiences of complications, and following contact with urgent and emergency care.

Conclusion: this is the first review to characterise how patients and informal caregivers make decisions about cancer-related complications. Findings show preparation for complications should be treated as a process (rather than an event), and poor experiences of services contribute to delayed help-seeking and risk avoidable harm.
2045-435X
Defty, John
6442778f-83b3-4d10-be87-e541865770b5
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7
Defty, John
6442778f-83b3-4d10-be87-e541865770b5
Wagland, Richard
16a44dcc-29cd-4797-9af2-41ef87f64d08
Turnbull, Joanne
cd1f8462-d698-4a90-af82-46c39536694b
Richardson, Alison
3db30680-aa47-43a5-b54d-62d10ece17b7

Defty, John, Wagland, Richard, Turnbull, Joanne and Richardson, Alison (2025) Symptom appraisal and help-seeking for complications of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. (doi:10.1136/spcare-2025-005477).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: complications of cancer and its treatment can be life-threatening, disrupt cancer treatment and negatively impact health-related quality of life. While we understand how people appraise symptoms prior to a cancer diagnosis, little is known about how people decide to seek help for complications during cancer treatment.

Aim: characterise how patients and informal caregivers appraise symptoms suggestive of, and decide whether to seek help from urgent and emergency care (or not) for, complications of cancer and its treatment.

Methods: systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Six electronic databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo and Web of Science) were searched for papers using qualitative methods published since 2000 (last search performed on 11 October 2024). Supplementary and cluster searches were performed. 7120 records were identified and 22 papers (representing accounts of over 300 people with cancer) were included following the application of the ‘appraisal prompts’ criteria. Data were synthesised using abductive analysis.

Findings: a conceptual map was developed to articulate how five analytic constructs interact and influence the ‘patient work’ of detecting, interpreting and responding to complications. Findings show that appraising symptoms is iterative and informed by knowledge, skills and perceptions developed prior to treatment through experiences of complications, and following contact with urgent and emergency care.

Conclusion: this is the first review to characterise how patients and informal caregivers make decisions about cancer-related complications. Findings show preparation for complications should be treated as a process (rather than an event), and poor experiences of services contribute to delayed help-seeking and risk avoidable harm.

Text
spcare-2025-005477.full - Version of Record
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 June 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 7 July 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 503979
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/503979
ISSN: 2045-435X
PURE UUID: c28d3869-b315-4687-bfba-cb7972d9c1d5
ORCID for Richard Wagland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-7587
ORCID for Joanne Turnbull: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5006-4438
ORCID for Alison Richardson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-5755

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2025 17:06
Last modified: 22 Aug 2025 02:02

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: John Defty
Author: Richard Wagland ORCID iD
Author: Joanne Turnbull ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×