The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Measurable residual disease–guided therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Measurable residual disease–guided therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Measurable residual disease–guided therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Background: an interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib–venetoclax was superior to fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib–venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.

Methods: in this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib–venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival.

Results: a total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib–venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib–venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively.

Conclusions: with extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib–venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib–venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.)
0028-4793
Munir, Talha
bd63bc5f-9965-4be0-a6ec-167cccdeecd8
Girvan, Sean
6f56e791-cbe4-4867-871d-4c33fb0e4bf1
Cairns, David A.
8177d1d3-73de-44b2-a2f5-292eededa50d
Bloor, Adrian
9f3b1bbf-533f-400b-8d37-18a72e308806
Allsup, David
c1dc45b0-0e4b-4e84-83fa-8365707292f9
Varghese, Abraham M.
05cd5926-1630-44b4-8c0e-b87c7d43c903
Gohil, Satyen
79e2995a-4b9e-4d35-a8cd-e6efd5bf6e7c
Paneesha, Shankara
6e98cd97-56eb-40e9-b52a-8d70017d02e8
Pettitt, Andrew
fb9da802-0ff6-420d-8805-0efb461f823d
Eyre, Toby
b81fb7eb-7ebc-416f-a67e-e1fc2d11a54e
Fox, Christopher P.
9ddc7032-e310-491d-a1b9-85d724d0bb50
Forconi, Francesco
ce9ed873-58cf-4876-bf3a-9ba1d163edc8
Balotis, Constantine
f3ab35f1-eb07-437a-83bc-d2b83dc6a71e
Pemberton, Nicholas
1b158a48-934a-463e-86a7-4f9e40f02f0a
Sheehy, Oonagh
73a9d69a-d510-4d0f-a4e0-8d2f97a6fe14
Gribben, John
62dc9428-2e9d-4398-ac45-e8495884ec9c
Elmusharaf, Nagah
378ed555-39f4-40b5-aea7-c9ffc9b1b13e
Gatto, Simona
5bd368dd-fcc2-4c09-a46d-9ff11b0e0469
Preston, Gavin
2e05f669-2f77-4fdf-9e8b-11f8b494eed6
Schuh, Anna
fab77ad0-7ddd-48d4-bfc5-5db3d3a1c299
Walewska, Renata
326c1001-fcdb-452a-aa53-2c82a1ca39a5
Duley, Lelia
db76a61c-94d8-4ec8-82cd-d7baca16f665
Webster, Nichola
f800b66b-d198-4916-9a09-60c7bafd7b06
Dalal, Surita
bcecf39c-bbf3-4c1d-9d88-273456b0d902
Rawstron, Andrew
c9ead0d9-167f-4dcf-ab74-276e3c0dd9a5
Howard, Dena
dfc886d1-6e1b-4fd9-868d-c96040620849
Hockaday, Anna
11ba0865-e8c0-4419-9963-fed7a3c3c6ef
Jackson, Sharon
308c0d33-58fe-4a06-adaf-964bb13fc590
Greatorex, Natasha
4db6ed98-0d18-4fad-97ee-42843e2115eb
Bell, Sue
8626b8e9-43d9-4b9c-8e40-506767dfe28b
Stones, David
b6dcd128-e3a8-4f57-982c-089fd208834d
Brown, Julia M.
ae941016-e083-4425-bcc5-dc6ecfe82a8c
Patten, Piers E.M..
6e9d43f7-96ea-4d70-85c4-927f89b1a5aa
Hillmen, Peter
ab511e8c-32e6-44f3-9653-bea4e967de8d
the UK CLL Trials Group
et al.
Munir, Talha
bd63bc5f-9965-4be0-a6ec-167cccdeecd8
Girvan, Sean
6f56e791-cbe4-4867-871d-4c33fb0e4bf1
Cairns, David A.
8177d1d3-73de-44b2-a2f5-292eededa50d
Bloor, Adrian
9f3b1bbf-533f-400b-8d37-18a72e308806
Allsup, David
c1dc45b0-0e4b-4e84-83fa-8365707292f9
Varghese, Abraham M.
05cd5926-1630-44b4-8c0e-b87c7d43c903
Gohil, Satyen
79e2995a-4b9e-4d35-a8cd-e6efd5bf6e7c
Paneesha, Shankara
6e98cd97-56eb-40e9-b52a-8d70017d02e8
Pettitt, Andrew
fb9da802-0ff6-420d-8805-0efb461f823d
Eyre, Toby
b81fb7eb-7ebc-416f-a67e-e1fc2d11a54e
Fox, Christopher P.
9ddc7032-e310-491d-a1b9-85d724d0bb50
Forconi, Francesco
ce9ed873-58cf-4876-bf3a-9ba1d163edc8
Balotis, Constantine
f3ab35f1-eb07-437a-83bc-d2b83dc6a71e
Pemberton, Nicholas
1b158a48-934a-463e-86a7-4f9e40f02f0a
Sheehy, Oonagh
73a9d69a-d510-4d0f-a4e0-8d2f97a6fe14
Gribben, John
62dc9428-2e9d-4398-ac45-e8495884ec9c
Elmusharaf, Nagah
378ed555-39f4-40b5-aea7-c9ffc9b1b13e
Gatto, Simona
5bd368dd-fcc2-4c09-a46d-9ff11b0e0469
Preston, Gavin
2e05f669-2f77-4fdf-9e8b-11f8b494eed6
Schuh, Anna
fab77ad0-7ddd-48d4-bfc5-5db3d3a1c299
Walewska, Renata
326c1001-fcdb-452a-aa53-2c82a1ca39a5
Duley, Lelia
db76a61c-94d8-4ec8-82cd-d7baca16f665
Webster, Nichola
f800b66b-d198-4916-9a09-60c7bafd7b06
Dalal, Surita
bcecf39c-bbf3-4c1d-9d88-273456b0d902
Rawstron, Andrew
c9ead0d9-167f-4dcf-ab74-276e3c0dd9a5
Howard, Dena
dfc886d1-6e1b-4fd9-868d-c96040620849
Hockaday, Anna
11ba0865-e8c0-4419-9963-fed7a3c3c6ef
Jackson, Sharon
308c0d33-58fe-4a06-adaf-964bb13fc590
Greatorex, Natasha
4db6ed98-0d18-4fad-97ee-42843e2115eb
Bell, Sue
8626b8e9-43d9-4b9c-8e40-506767dfe28b
Stones, David
b6dcd128-e3a8-4f57-982c-089fd208834d
Brown, Julia M.
ae941016-e083-4425-bcc5-dc6ecfe82a8c
Patten, Piers E.M..
6e9d43f7-96ea-4d70-85c4-927f89b1a5aa
Hillmen, Peter
ab511e8c-32e6-44f3-9653-bea4e967de8d

Munir, Talha, Girvan, Sean and Cairns, David A. , the UK CLL Trials Group and et al. (2025) Measurable residual disease–guided therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. (doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2504341).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: an interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib–venetoclax was superior to fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib–venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.

Methods: in this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib–venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival.

Results: a total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib–venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib–venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively.

Conclusions: with extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib–venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib–venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.)

Text
NEJM_I_V_vs_I_vs_FCR_NEJM_publication_v4.0_clean (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (90kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 15 June 2025

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 504015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504015
ISSN: 0028-4793
PURE UUID: e8f57b3f-64cf-40a6-801a-cb7554c4e819
ORCID for Francesco Forconi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2211-1831

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Aug 2025 15:35
Last modified: 09 Sep 2025 01:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Talha Munir
Author: Sean Girvan
Author: David A. Cairns
Author: Adrian Bloor
Author: David Allsup
Author: Abraham M. Varghese
Author: Satyen Gohil
Author: Shankara Paneesha
Author: Andrew Pettitt
Author: Toby Eyre
Author: Christopher P. Fox
Author: Constantine Balotis
Author: Nicholas Pemberton
Author: Oonagh Sheehy
Author: John Gribben
Author: Nagah Elmusharaf
Author: Simona Gatto
Author: Gavin Preston
Author: Anna Schuh
Author: Renata Walewska
Author: Lelia Duley
Author: Nichola Webster
Author: Surita Dalal
Author: Andrew Rawstron
Author: Dena Howard
Author: Anna Hockaday
Author: Sharon Jackson
Author: Natasha Greatorex
Author: Sue Bell
Author: David Stones
Author: Julia M. Brown
Author: Piers E.M.. Patten
Author: Peter Hillmen
Corporate Author: the UK CLL Trials Group
Corporate Author: et al.

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×