Strategies for developing interactional expertise: how non-autistic communication partners enable or block the effective contributions to significant conversations by autistic people

Abstract

Purpose: decades of communication research have focused on the so-called ‘deficits’ of autistic people and on interventions to remediate these. This study takes a different perspective in line with the neurodiversity paradigm to examine what non-autistic communication partners do to enable or undermine the ability of autistic people to think and to contribute their own knowledge and ideas to the conversation.

Materials and methods: in-depth, longitudinal case studies of the communication exchanges between three autistic women and two autistic men and their chosen, non-autistic communication partners (one man and six women) were undertaken over 4-12 months via semi-structured interviews, observation, reflective conversations, and diary records.

Results: conversation transcripts were analysed thematically to identify the communication of the non-autistic participants as broadly helpful (‘grease’ or ‘flow’) or unhelpful (‘blocks’). Sub-themes included how to optimise engagement, respond to disengagement, build shared understanding, and provide prompts at the right time. Interrupting, giving ideas and asking unhelpful questions often functioned as a block to thinking and contribution to the conversation.

Conclusion: the ‘grease’ and ‘blocks’ identified could provide a powerful and timely reframing for the focus of autism communication training towards promoting interactional expertise, especially for anyone involved in important consultation with autistic people.

More information

Identifiers

ORCID for Sarah Parsons: orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-4745

Catalogue record

Export record

Altmetrics