Urbanisation, democracy, and political regime transformations
Urbanisation, democracy, and political regime transformations
Cities, and the process of urbanisation more broadly, have long been associated with political change – and democratisation in particular. However, there is little cross-country empirical research on the relationship between urbanisation and political change, and a tendency to conflate urbanisation with industrialisation and economic development. This gap is significant for two reasons. First, many of the hypothesised mechanisms linking urbanisation to political change are associated with socioeconomic changes driven by industrialisation and economic development. Second, many low- and middle-income countries have undergone rapid “urbanisation without industrialisation”. What then are the political consequences of urbanisation without industrialisation?
To answer this, we draw a key conceptual distinction between urbanisation – the increase in the relative share of a country's population living in urban areas – and urban population scale – the absolute size of urban populations. While much of the literature focuses upon the political implications of urbanisation, we argue that the sheer scale of urban populations may be more consequential for political change. Specifically, we suggest that although the hypothesised associations between urban living and democratic preferences among citizens are weak, urban living facilitates political engagement, and hence large urban populations may stimulate political change.
We test this hypothesis with cross-national regressions analysing the determinants of levels of democracy and episodes of political regime transformation since 1960 in 161 countries. We find no association between levels of urbanisation or urban population size and levels of democracy. By contrast, we find a positive and significant association between urban population size and political regime transformations, with a bias towards democratic change. Our study offers important insights into the relationship between urbanisation and political change and the political implications of rapid urbanisation without industrialisation unfolding in many parts of the world today.
Autocracy, Democracy, Modernisation, Regime transformation, Urbanisation
Dorward, Nick
a6c40613-4337-44f8-83e8-eb3730a7094d
Fox, Sean
b969f434-93b0-47c7-bf3c-ae9b88244545
Hoelscher, Kristian
db0857af-ed5b-446a-9402-65b9832e72cf
3 July 2025
Dorward, Nick
a6c40613-4337-44f8-83e8-eb3730a7094d
Fox, Sean
b969f434-93b0-47c7-bf3c-ae9b88244545
Hoelscher, Kristian
db0857af-ed5b-446a-9402-65b9832e72cf
Dorward, Nick, Fox, Sean and Hoelscher, Kristian
(2025)
Urbanisation, democracy, and political regime transformations.
Political Geography, 122, [103382].
(doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103382).
Abstract
Cities, and the process of urbanisation more broadly, have long been associated with political change – and democratisation in particular. However, there is little cross-country empirical research on the relationship between urbanisation and political change, and a tendency to conflate urbanisation with industrialisation and economic development. This gap is significant for two reasons. First, many of the hypothesised mechanisms linking urbanisation to political change are associated with socioeconomic changes driven by industrialisation and economic development. Second, many low- and middle-income countries have undergone rapid “urbanisation without industrialisation”. What then are the political consequences of urbanisation without industrialisation?
To answer this, we draw a key conceptual distinction between urbanisation – the increase in the relative share of a country's population living in urban areas – and urban population scale – the absolute size of urban populations. While much of the literature focuses upon the political implications of urbanisation, we argue that the sheer scale of urban populations may be more consequential for political change. Specifically, we suggest that although the hypothesised associations between urban living and democratic preferences among citizens are weak, urban living facilitates political engagement, and hence large urban populations may stimulate political change.
We test this hypothesis with cross-national regressions analysing the determinants of levels of democracy and episodes of political regime transformation since 1960 in 161 countries. We find no association between levels of urbanisation or urban population size and levels of democracy. By contrast, we find a positive and significant association between urban population size and political regime transformations, with a bias towards democratic change. Our study offers important insights into the relationship between urbanisation and political change and the political implications of rapid urbanisation without industrialisation unfolding in many parts of the world today.
Text
1-s2.0-S0962629825001143-main
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 16 June 2025
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 July 2025
Published date: 3 July 2025
Keywords:
Autocracy, Democracy, Modernisation, Regime transformation, Urbanisation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504102
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504102
ISSN: 0962-6298
PURE UUID: 6f3d4525-527c-4ab8-92fc-ee31f762584a
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Aug 2025 16:41
Last modified: 27 Aug 2025 02:17
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Nick Dorward
Author:
Sean Fox
Author:
Kristian Hoelscher
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics