What is NORML? Sedimented meanings in ambiguous organizational identities
What is NORML? Sedimented meanings in ambiguous organizational identities
Organizational identity scholarship has largely focused on the mutability of meanings ascribed to ambiguous identity labels. In contrast, we analyze a case study of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) to explore how leaders maintained a meaning ascribed to an ambiguous identity label amid successive identity threats. We found that heightened dissensus surrounding meanings attributed to the organization’s “reform group” label at three key points spurred theoretically similar manifestations of two processes. The first, meaning sedimentation, involved leaders invoking history to advocate for the importance of their preferred meaning while mulling the inclusion of others. The second, reconstructing the past, occurred as leaders and members alike offered narratives that obscured the history of disavowed meanings while sharing new memories of those they prioritized. Our work complements research on identity change by drawing attention to the processes by which meaning(s) underlying ambiguous identity labels might survive.
Lyle, M.C.B.
3eede67f-348b-4f77-bef2-d070655cde28
Walsh, I.J.
2889b861-b4db-4296-a947-d2595af3e9b3
Coraiola, D.M.
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Lyle, M.C.B.
3eede67f-348b-4f77-bef2-d070655cde28
Walsh, I.J.
2889b861-b4db-4296-a947-d2595af3e9b3
Coraiola, D.M.
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Lyle, M.C.B., Walsh, I.J. and Coraiola, D.M.
(2021)
What is NORML? Sedimented meanings in ambiguous organizational identities.
Organization Studies, 43 (12).
(doi:10.1177/01708406211057725).
Abstract
Organizational identity scholarship has largely focused on the mutability of meanings ascribed to ambiguous identity labels. In contrast, we analyze a case study of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) to explore how leaders maintained a meaning ascribed to an ambiguous identity label amid successive identity threats. We found that heightened dissensus surrounding meanings attributed to the organization’s “reform group” label at three key points spurred theoretically similar manifestations of two processes. The first, meaning sedimentation, involved leaders invoking history to advocate for the importance of their preferred meaning while mulling the inclusion of others. The second, reconstructing the past, occurred as leaders and members alike offered narratives that obscured the history of disavowed meanings while sharing new memories of those they prioritized. Our work complements research on identity change by drawing attention to the processes by which meaning(s) underlying ambiguous identity labels might survive.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 30 November 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504125
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504125
ISSN: 0170-8406
PURE UUID: 5b7c0fe3-3e3a-43de-90bc-91a15bc42a8d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 26 Aug 2025 16:52
Last modified: 27 Aug 2025 02:21
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
M.C.B. Lyle
Author:
I.J. Walsh
Author:
D.M. Coraiola
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics