The process of implementing programmes across the Scottish criminal justice system: lessons learned from the moving forward making changes programme
The process of implementing programmes across the Scottish criminal justice system: lessons learned from the moving forward making changes programme
Background. The successful translation of research into practice is a much debated topic across the criminal justice literature (Andrews & Bonta, 2010). Inherent to the FRAME policy, the Risk Management Authority (RMA) outline the need to implement correctional interventions with integrity and fidelity at organisational and individual levels to contribute to the reduction of reoffending. At a basic level, the term ‘implementation’ refers to the active and planned processes to mainstream an intervention such as a treatment programme within an organisation or system (Rabin, Haire-Joshu et al, 2008). Though frequently referred to in evaluations of treatment programmes or guidelines, a description of the implementation process, i.e. the ‘know how’, is rarely documented nor defined (e.g. McNair, Woodward & Mount, 2010). Aims. The present study aimed to document and evaluate the barriers and obstacles to the implementation of the Moving Forward Making Changes (MF:MC) programme across the criminal justice system in Scotland. Methods. Semi structured interviews were conducted with all key stakeholders (agencies) involved in the planning and the implementation of MF:MC. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. This is a qualitative method, which is typically used to assess and review policies and procedures across organisations. Main findings. A number of interrelated emergent themes were identified, which were labelled with reference to the implementation and project management literature. In particular, interviewees identified a prevailing lack of:- clear project management, leadership and support, communication and documentation as well as clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Main conclusions. The implementation of MF:MC appeared to have commenced with limited reference to the key factors evidenced as necessary in the success of implementations. This said, despite challenges and shortcomings, interviewees identified positive aspects, perhaps most importantly a clear desire to make MF:MC work.
Vojt, Gabriele
20a2722e-e8b5-49e9-9f9f-01cf4e1b1387
April 2016
Vojt, Gabriele
20a2722e-e8b5-49e9-9f9f-01cf4e1b1387
Vojt, Gabriele
(2016)
The process of implementing programmes across the Scottish criminal justice system: lessons learned from the moving forward making changes programme
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
Background. The successful translation of research into practice is a much debated topic across the criminal justice literature (Andrews & Bonta, 2010). Inherent to the FRAME policy, the Risk Management Authority (RMA) outline the need to implement correctional interventions with integrity and fidelity at organisational and individual levels to contribute to the reduction of reoffending. At a basic level, the term ‘implementation’ refers to the active and planned processes to mainstream an intervention such as a treatment programme within an organisation or system (Rabin, Haire-Joshu et al, 2008). Though frequently referred to in evaluations of treatment programmes or guidelines, a description of the implementation process, i.e. the ‘know how’, is rarely documented nor defined (e.g. McNair, Woodward & Mount, 2010). Aims. The present study aimed to document and evaluate the barriers and obstacles to the implementation of the Moving Forward Making Changes (MF:MC) programme across the criminal justice system in Scotland. Methods. Semi structured interviews were conducted with all key stakeholders (agencies) involved in the planning and the implementation of MF:MC. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. This is a qualitative method, which is typically used to assess and review policies and procedures across organisations. Main findings. A number of interrelated emergent themes were identified, which were labelled with reference to the implementation and project management literature. In particular, interviewees identified a prevailing lack of:- clear project management, leadership and support, communication and documentation as well as clearly defined roles and responsibilities. Main conclusions. The implementation of MF:MC appeared to have commenced with limited reference to the key factors evidenced as necessary in the success of implementations. This said, despite challenges and shortcomings, interviewees identified positive aspects, perhaps most importantly a clear desire to make MF:MC work.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: April 2016
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504184
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504184
PURE UUID: 316b82de-4d9c-41e4-a73e-d39ca2040948
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 28 Aug 2025 16:56
Last modified: 30 Aug 2025 02:21
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Gabriele Vojt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics