Organizational fields as mnemonic communities
Organizational fields as mnemonic communities
The organizational field has become an influential construct in management theory. Despite its prominence, the construct has defied precise definition. Most definitions emphasize either structural elements of fields (fields as place) or their ideational elements (fields as meaning systems). Missing from this analysis is an appreciation of how meaning is given to structural relations. The authors’ core thesis is that memory is a critically important bridging construct through which meaning is given to place. They demonstrate that organizational fields are historical accretions of shared memories that are reproduced and become objectified over time until they acquire the status of ontological reality. The term mnemonic fields is introduced to capture the understanding that fields are cognitions of network relations that are created, maintained and changed through processes of collective remembering.
collective memory, mnemonic communities, Mnemonic fields, organizational fields, organizational remembering
45-68
Coraiola, Diego
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Suddaby, Roy
2a408b51-416b-4206-932b-543cd9b3f6e6
Foster, William Milton
8259ead1-7693-45f4-b5f9-5a0428bcebe1
2018
Coraiola, Diego
31e45891-a0a2-4f0d-8625-977336c832b9
Suddaby, Roy
2a408b51-416b-4206-932b-543cd9b3f6e6
Foster, William Milton
8259ead1-7693-45f4-b5f9-5a0428bcebe1
Coraiola, Diego, Suddaby, Roy and Foster, William Milton
(2018)
Organizational fields as mnemonic communities.
In,
Knowledge and Space.
(Knowledge and Space, 13)
Springer Nature, .
(doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_3).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
The organizational field has become an influential construct in management theory. Despite its prominence, the construct has defied precise definition. Most definitions emphasize either structural elements of fields (fields as place) or their ideational elements (fields as meaning systems). Missing from this analysis is an appreciation of how meaning is given to structural relations. The authors’ core thesis is that memory is a critically important bridging construct through which meaning is given to place. They demonstrate that organizational fields are historical accretions of shared memories that are reproduced and become objectified over time until they acquire the status of ontological reality. The term mnemonic fields is introduced to capture the understanding that fields are cognitions of network relations that are created, maintained and changed through processes of collective remembering.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2018
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
Keywords:
collective memory, mnemonic communities, Mnemonic fields, organizational fields, organizational remembering
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 504314
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/504314
ISSN: 1877-9220
PURE UUID: 8e27800f-170d-48bd-9a74-ee913f034c3b
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 04 Sep 2025 16:38
Last modified: 20 Sep 2025 02:29
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Diego Coraiola
Author:
Roy Suddaby
Author:
William Milton Foster
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics